./packages/openofficeorg/3.1.1/unstable r1866: merge 1:3.1.1-15+squeeze1

2010-02-12 Thread Rene Engelhard
revno: 1866 [merge] committer: Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org branch nick: unstable timestamp: Fri 2010-02-12 12:44:46 +0100 message: merge 1:3.1.1-15+squeeze1 modified: changelog === modified file 'changelog' --- a/changelog

./packages/openofficeorg/3.2/experimental r1810: mention security fixes

2010-02-12 Thread Rene Engelhard
revno: 1810 committer: Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org branch nick: debian timestamp: Fri 2010-02-12 01:55:00 +0100 message: mention security fixes modified: changelog === modified file 'changelog' --- a/changelog 2010-02-11 17:39:54

./packages/openofficeorg/3.2/experimental r1811: merge

2010-02-12 Thread Rene Engelhard
revno: 1811 [merge] committer: Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org branch nick: debian timestamp: Fri 2010-02-12 02:00:40 +0100 message: merge modified: changelog rules === modified file 'changelog' --- a/changelog 2010-02-12 00:55:00

Bug#569124: marked as done (openoffice.org-common: Debian menu xpm icons look broken)

2010-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:22:40 +0100 with message-id 20100212122239.gc28...@rene-engelhard.de and subject line [r...@debian.org: Re: Broken xpm icons] has caused the Debian Bug report #569124, regarding openoffice.org-common: Debian menu xpm icons look broken to be marked as done.

Processed: notfound 569124 in 1.3.8-1

2010-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 notfound 569124 1.3.8-1 Bug #569124 {Done: Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org} [openoffice.org-common] openoffice.org-common: Debian menu xpm icons look broken There is no

Bug#569124: Bug#569167: [r...@debian.org: Re: Broken xpm icons]

2010-02-12 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi! On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org wrote: Oops, closed the wrong bug. (569167 should have been closed anyway, though, if the bug is a graphicsmagick bug what Nelsons mail says ] Yep for closing #569167 :-) And the graphicsmagick bug is #560232 Best regards,