Jan,
Since the debian gcc maintainers are in the process of removing
gcc 3.1 from sid, I decided to purge it manually off of my machine
and was shocked to see the following...
bogus:/home# apt-get remove cpp-3.1 cpp-3.1-doc g77-3.1-doc gcc-3.1-base
gcc-3.1-doc gij-3.1 gnat-3.1-doc
Jan,
Looking at the binaries again, they all appear to be properly
linked to libstdc++.so.5 so it must be a stale Depends in the
debian/control file. We should do a 1.0.1-6 rebuild with this fixed
though so folks can gracefully remove gcc 3.1.x from their machines.
Jack
Hi,
Jack Howarth wrote:
Since the debian gcc maintainers are in the process of removing
gcc 3.1 from sid, I decided to purge it manually off of my machine
and was shocked to see the following...
bogus:/home# apt-get remove cpp-3.1 cpp-3.1-doc g77-3.1-doc gcc-3.1-base
gcc-3.1-doc
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.0.1-5
It appears that openoffice.org has an incorrect Depends on
libstdc++.so.4 when in fact it is linked to libstdc++.so.5
now. This shows up when one tries to purge off all of gcc 3.1.1
from a debian ppc sid machine with openoffice.org installed.
Apt-get
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 162240 + pending
Bug#162240: incorrect Depends in openoffice.org 1.0.1-5
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
tag 162240 + pending
thanks
Hi,
Jack Howarth wrote:
It appears that openoffice.org has an incorrect Depends on
libstdc++.so.4 when in fact it is linked to libstdc++.so.5
now. This shows up when one tries to purge off all of gcc 3.1.1
from a debian ppc sid machine with openoffice.org
Hi Jack
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 12:35:45AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
Since the debian gcc maintainers are in the process of removing
gcc 3.1 from sid, I decided to purge it manually off of my machine
and was shocked to see the following...
[apt-get Error]
Yes .. your are right. We have the
I have set up a chroot environment where I want to build OpenOffice.org for
Woody. When building, the configuration process says configure: error:
STLport4 libraries not found and stops.
In addition to the base system, I have installed build-essential. Then I did
apt-get build-dep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 13:44, Gaute Hvoslef Kvalnes wrote:
In particular, libstlport4.5gcc3.0 and libstlport4.5-common (both
4.5.3-3+woody) were installed, so configure should have found it, right?
When building with dpkg-buildpackage,
Onsdag 25. september 2002 15:16 skreiv Paul Cupis:
I think you will need the corresponding -dev packages (eg
libstlport4.5gcc3.0-dev)
libstlport4.5gcc3.0-dev is installed, so that's not the problem. (It just
appeared a couple of lines further down in the installation log, so I missed
it last
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:22:58PM +0200, Gaute Hvoslef Kvalnes wrote:
libstlport4.5gcc3.0-dev is installed, so that's not the problem. (It just
appeared a couple of lines further down in the installation log, so I missed
it last time ;-)
Heh, someone finally noticed I cheated ;)
The patch
Hello,
Subject says it all: I'm search openoffice deb for woody
(without deps on libc6, gcc 3.2 etc from sid).
I've just subscribed because all I found in the d-ooo mailing list archive
was that some had plans to do it at the end of August.
Thx, for any pointer and sorry if I missed to RTFM
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 04:27:04PM +0200, Achim Bohnet wrote:
Subject says it all: I'm search openoffice deb for woody
(without deps on libc6, gcc 3.2 etc from sid).
Pick a source from:
http://www.linux-debian.de/openoffice/mirrors.html
Replace 'testing' or 'unstable' with 'woody'.
Jan: Will
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 17:11, Chris Halls wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 04:27:04PM +0200, Achim Bohnet wrote:
Subject says it all: I'm search openoffice deb for woody
(without deps on libc6, gcc 3.2 etc from sid).
Pick a source from:
Hi, for the openoffice script, you should add and make icons for
the HTML editor (which I use quite a bit actually) and the Master
Document. You can get support by applying the attached diff to the
script.
--
Matt Behrens [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL:http://zigg.com/
--- /usr/bin/openoffice 2002-08-19
Hi poeple!!
I have the 1.0 version...should I update to the 1.0.1 version???
Thanks a lot
--
Alejandro Matos
Perumanta Austriapi
...tupac manchis kama
--
16 matches
Mail list logo