Package: openoffice.org-writer
Version: 1:2.4.1-13
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Hello,
sadly we found a IMHO bigger problem for the 2.x users which will be in lenny.
OOo 2.x implemented the ODF standard wrong which is fixed in OOo 3.0:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 507865 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96878
Bug#507865: openoffice.org-writer: OOo 2.4.x openinig OOo 3 files doesn't show
text (2.x implements standard wrong)
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
forwarded 507865 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96878
tag 507865 + upstream
thanks
Noel Köthe wrote:
sadly we found a IMHO bigger problem for the 2.x users which will be in lenny.
OOo 2.x implemented the ODF standard wrong which is fixed in OOo 3.0:
[ oops, I noticed I did forget to Cc -release ]
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Now the problem is that data exchange from 3.0 to 2.x results in documents
with blanked text so the user will not see the data of the text.
But only when the text was formatted as hidden if I read the issue right?
Hello together,
Am Freitag, den 05.12.2008, 09:40 +0100 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Now the problem is that data exchange from 3.0 to 2.x results in documents
with blanked text so the user will not see the data of the text.
But only when the text was formatted as
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 09:40 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
But only when the text was formatted as hidden if I read the issue right?
Not only then.
Conforming documents (e.g. documents produced by Abiword are known to
sometimes have this) might have text:display=true explicitly set,
which is then
Hi,
Tim Retout wrote:
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 09:40 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
But only when the text was formatted as hidden if I read the issue right?
Not only then.
Conforming documents (e.g. documents produced by Abiword are known to
sometimes have this) might have text:display=true
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 10:16 +0100, Noèl Köthe wrote:
I prefer to put OOo 3.x into lenny because this is IMHO the major
desktop application for alot of users.
I am not so keen on this idea.
We can fix OO.o 2.x for lenny users by backporting half of a relatively
small patch; Chris Halls and I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
forwarded 434510 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84584
Bug#434510: flashplugin-nonfree: please add support for openoffice.org
Noted your statement that Bug has been
revno: 1334
committer: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
branch nick: experimental
timestamp: Fri 2008-12-05 12:55:03 +0100
message:
close #434510
modified:
changelog
=== modified file 'changelog'
--- a/changelog 2008-12-04 17:03:32
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
retitle 434510 [fixed for 3.0.1, cws swffixes] lash v9 does not work
Bug#434510: ~[fixed for 3.0.1, cws swffixes] flash v9 does not work
Changed Bug title to `[fixed for 3.0.1, cws
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# GAH!
retitle 434510 [fixed for 3.0.1, cws swffixes] lash v9 does not work
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# GAH! 2
retitle 434510 [fixed for 3.0.1, cws swffixes] flash v9 does not work
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# GAH!
retitle 434510 [fixed for 3.0.1, cws swffixes] lash v9 does not work
Bug#434510: [fixed for 3.0.1, cws swffixes] lash v9 does not work
Changed Bug title to `[fixed for 3.0.1,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# GAH! 2
retitle 434510 [fixed for 3.0.1, cws swffixes] flash v9 does not work
Bug#434510: [fixed for 3.0.1, cws swffixes] lash v9 does not work
Changed Bug title to `[fixed for
Your message dated Fri, 5 Dec 2008 18:47:50 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug close
has caused the Debian Bug report #386936,
regarding openoffice.org-core: Depends on libgstreamer0.10-0... why?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
16 matches
Mail list logo
