Bug#915583: debian sphinx styling: second attempt

2023-09-14 Thread Stéphane Blondon
Hello, I've done a new version. It's based on 'sphinx_rtd_theme' theme. So, to build the site, the package 'python3-sphinx-rtd-theme' requires to be added to dependencies. A new file 'debian.css' is specific to set some colors and renderings. Reusing 'Read the docs' theme allows to have a

Re: Does iproute2 moving config files to /usr/lib violate section 10.7.2?

2023-09-14 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 04:01:05PM +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote: > Hello debian-policy, > > iproute2 has moved it's config files that were traditionally at > /etc/iproute2 to /usr/lib/iproute2 due to an upstream change. I've tried to > convince the maintainer(s) that this is a bad idea in

Re: Does iproute2 moving config files to /usr/lib violate section 10.7.2?

2023-09-14 Thread Russ Allbery
Daniel Gröber writes: >> Any configuration files created or used by your package must reside >> in /etc. > Pretty clear cut in my reading, however this was promptly shot down by > Bastian with the justification: Configuration file has a very specific meaning in Policy: it's a file that the

Re: Does iproute2 moving config files to /usr/lib violate section 10.7.2?

2023-09-14 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Daniel" == Daniel Gröber writes: >> Any configuration files created or used by your package must >> reside in /etc. It's fine for packages to store defaults outside of /etc. But that 's only true if you can override those defaults by placing a file in /etc.

Does iproute2 moving config files to /usr/lib violate section 10.7.2?

2023-09-14 Thread Daniel Gröber
Hello debian-policy, iproute2 has moved it's config files that were traditionally at /etc/iproute2 to /usr/lib/iproute2 due to an upstream change. I've tried to convince the maintainer(s) that this is a bad idea in Bug#1051577, when this was shot down I filed Bug#1051847 as severity:serious on