Package: developers-reference
X-Debbugs-CC: lea...@debian.org
Please mention that DDs can get official certification of their Debian
project membership from the DPL. Some details are available here:
http://wiki.debian.org/DDCertificate
http://lists.debian.org/20100401011741.gp10...@einval.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100617160314.ga28...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100617160318.ga28...@debian.org
Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be writes:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:07:33AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
p
Normally a ttBreaks/tt entry will have an earlier than
version clause; such a ttBreaks/tt is introduced in the
- version of an (implicit or explicit) dependency which
-
Stuart Prescott stuart+deb...@nanonanonano.net writes:
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 19:07:33 Russ Allbery wrote:
+Normally, ttBreaks/tt should be used in conjunction
+with ttReplaces/tt.footnote
+ To see why ttBreaks/tt is required in addition
+ to
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes:
* Russ Allbery r...@debian.org, 2010-06-16, 11:07:
+ continue to do so (but be aware that this is often an error
+ that should be fixed rather than using ttConflicts/tt --
+ see, for example, ref id=binaries),/item
I find the
Here is updated proposed wording incorporating fixes for the various
issues raised on the list since yesterday.
diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
index 32eb5c2..f2d81e8 100644
--- a/policy.sgml
+++ b/policy.sgml
@@ -4641,17 +4641,29 @@ Build-Depends: foo [linux-any], bar [any-i386], baz
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes:
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes:
I would prefer to see that jargon neologism removed everywhere, and
replaced with the more direct “packaged for Debian”.
Here is my attempt at a patch to replace the jargon term with terms in
common
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
Setting user to debian-pol...@packages.debian.org (was r...@debian.org).
limit package debian-policy
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'debian-policy'
Limit currently set to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 586163 debian-policy: Replace jargon term Debianise with terms in
common usage
Bug #586163 [debian-policy] debian-policy: Typo, please use Debianised the
same way everywhere
Changed Bug title to 'debian-policy: Replace jargon term
10 matches
Mail list logo
