Re: Bug#1060735: glib2.0/experimental: FTBFS on s390x and other 64-bit BE: gdatetime test fails or crashes

2024-01-13 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/3225 Control: tags -1 + help On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 at 16:21:46 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 at 15:21:02 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > > I recently uploaded a snapshot of GLib 2.79.x to experimental (in > >

Re: Bug#1060735: glib2.0/experimental: FTBFS on s390x and other 64-bit BE: gdatetime test fails or crashes

2024-01-13 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 at 15:21:02 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > I recently uploaded a snapshot of GLib 2.79.x to experimental (in > preparation for NEW processing) and it failed tests on s390x and on > the 64-bit, big-endian ports ppc64 and sparc64. I suspect this means > it's a general problem

Bug#1060735: glib2.0/experimental: FTBFS on s390x and other 64-bit BE: gdatetime test fails or crashes

2024-01-13 Thread Simon McVittie
Source: glib2.0 Version: 2.79.0+git20240110~g38f5ba3c-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs experimental X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-s...@lists.debian.org, debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org User: debian-s...@lists.debian.org Usertags: s390x I recently uploaded a snapshot of GLib 2.79.x to experimental (in

Re: cmake ftbfs on ppc64el (and ppc64)

2024-01-13 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Control: tags -1 +patch On Fri, 2024-01-12 at 01:31 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > This has now been tracked down to the libuv upstream change that introduced > support > for io_uring [1]. This regression is tracked now in a new issue for libuv [2]. The attached patch disables