modutils?
Thanks, found!
There was a file + symlink without package...
The 'purge' option of dpkg is your friend here (admittedly, packages
superseding older packages could be smarter about this - file a bug
against module-init-tools please)
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Am 2008-02-12 17:35:43, schrieb Bastian Blank:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 06:43:08PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
This has changed between Sarge and Etch?
Yes. It was changed in 3.2.2-5.
Perfect.
It seems, that my Etch-Office-Workstation (2.6.18) is doing dependencie
checking at each
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 06:43:08PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
This has changed between Sarge and Etch?
Yes. It was changed in 3.2.2-5.
It seems, that my Etch-Office-Workstation (2.6.18) is doing dependencie
checking at each bootup. Maybe this is a forgotten old piece of script
from
Am 2008-02-08 10:08:53, schrieb Bastian Blank:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 03:22:54PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2008-01-31 23:35:31, schrieb Gaudenz Steinlin:
Do you have any numbers that kernel with unneeded hardware options not
compiled in actually run faster? I would be very
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 03:22:54PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2008-01-31 23:35:31, schrieb Gaudenz Steinlin:
Do you have any numbers that kernel with unneeded hardware options not
compiled in actually run faster? I would be very suprised by this as the
additional code just never
Am 2008-01-31 23:35:31, schrieb Gaudenz Steinlin:
Do you have any numbers that kernel with unneeded hardware options not
compiled in actually run faster? I would be very suprised by this as the
additional code just never runs. AFAIK all applicable processor
optimizations for powerpc are
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 06:30:37PM -0800, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
Actually one more thing, any benefits to doing this? Besides the geek
satisfaction that all of us get from compiling a new kernel.
I think self-compiling kernels is generally overrated. I'd suggest
trying pre-packaged
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 22:43 -0800, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
As I understand, the new kernel has a new scheduler (CFS). Haven't
seen much benchmarks but the early ones I have seen showed some fairly
decent performance gains.
CFS was in 2.6.23 already and actually has some issues in 2.6.24,
On Jan 31, 2008 10:59 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 22:43 -0800, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
Actually one more thing, any benefits to doing this? Besides the geek
satisfaction that all of us get from compiling a new kernel.
I think self-compiling kernels is generally
On Jan 31, 2008 7:43 AM, Amit Uttamchandani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys,
I apologize for the fairly primitive question. But I have been fairly curious
as to the advantages of compiling the most recent kernels.
As I understand, the new kernel has a new scheduler (CFS). Haven't seen
Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
Hey guys,
I apologize for the fairly primitive question. But I have been fairly curious
as to the advantages of compiling the most recent kernels.
As I understand, the new kernel has a new scheduler (CFS). Haven't seen much
benchmarks but the early ones I have seen
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 12:50:23PM -0800, Bob McGowan wrote:
Well, the primary advantage to rolling your own is that you can customize the
kernel for your
hardware.
Generic kernels include drivers for all sorts of things, most of which you
don't have.
This can reduce the size of the
Bob McGowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Generic kernels include drivers for all sorts of things, most of which
you don't have.
This can reduce the size of the kernel, which can translate into
faster operations, as well as reduced space needed to hold it (and the
modules you build, if any).
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 12:50:23PM -0800, Bob McGowan wrote:
Well, the primary advantage to rolling your own is that you can customize the kernel for your
hardware.
Generic kernels include drivers for all sorts of things, most of which you
don't have.
This can
Actually one more thing, any benefits to doing this? Besides the geek
satisfaction that all of us get from compiling a new kernel.
I think self-compiling kernels is generally overrated. I'd suggest
trying pre-packaged kernels from sid first.
Pre-packaged kernels from sid. Will they work
Hey guys,
I apologize for the fairly primitive question. But I have been fairly curious
as to the advantages of compiling the most recent kernels.
As I understand, the new kernel has a new scheduler (CFS). Haven't seen much
benchmarks but the early ones I have seen showed some fairly decent
16 matches
Mail list logo
