Re: APT 0.6: let's get started

2005-02-19 Thread Michael Banck
everybody would expect as location for this discussion. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Official Swedish Debian Website

2005-02-25 Thread Michael Banck
is available in Swedish, right? See: http://www.nl.debian.org/index.sv.html incidentely loosing th .nl in the above urls works also (and is probably a lot easier to remembe :) I'm glad it's not only me who gets those .nl. all the time. It's the dutch conspiracy! Michael -- Michael Banck Debian

Re: Debian release strategy

2005-03-03 Thread Michael Banck
-meetings between the release managers, ftp-masters and QA people to discuss release matters. It seems to work pretty well for other projects, and might improve the communication and information both between the groups but also towards the bigger developer body. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian

Re: Question for Andreas Schuldei and Branden Robinson

2005-03-07 Thread Michael Banck
[Moving over to -project] On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 08:39:22PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: You forgot myself: Enrico Zini as well, employed part-time by Canonical[1] until the end of February, possibly more if I find the time. No, it was not intentional. I didn't know the job of Steve

Re: thank you for your support

2005-04-11 Thread Michael Banck
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:43:37PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:13:55AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: To those who ranked me poorly in this year's election, I hope to gain your confidence. If you'd like to mail me privately (or otherwise) to let me know how I

Re: non-free but distributable packages and kernel firmware

2005-04-13 Thread Michael Banck
. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: non-free but distributable packages and kernel firmware

2005-04-14 Thread Michael Banck
the scope and be more suggestive. What does GFDL-free mean, anyway? Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GFDL freedoms

2005-04-14 Thread Michael Banck
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 10:19:56AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: What does this cross-posting between debian-project and debian-private mean? It means follow-ups to Matthew's orginal post should have gone to debian-project only, but not everybody seemed to honor that. Michael -- Michael

Re: Wirelles nicht gefunden

2005-04-18 Thread Michael Banck
'Custom Debian Distribution'. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: disbursement approvals and email privacy

2005-05-19 Thread Michael Banck
* Elaborate on -private on [...]? Otherwise, I don't think CCing private will add anything or help. cheers, Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Re: Hurd drivers (was Re: Driver Authoring????)

2005-06-05 Thread Michael Banck
or pop up on IRC (#hug or #hurd-l4 on irc.debian.org) and (with some patience, there are only very few people working on the Hurd and most of them are very busy as well) you will get integrated into this nice community :) cheers, Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: sarge and the Wall Street Journal

2005-06-09 Thread Michael Banck
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 03:47:47PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: Peter Vandenabeele wrote: Well, Sarge == stable _did_ make it to the news now, but probably not as we have hoped ... My ZDnet news agent mailed me this item this morning: Debian drops ball on security updates There was a

Sarge review on Newsforge

2005-06-11 Thread Michael Banck
of use, security-consciousness, and a strict adherence to principle with a mostly current selection of well-tested software, in many ways Debian 3.1 is free software at its best. cheers, Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck

Re: Branden's mail policies

2005-06-19 Thread Michael Banck
other opinions on email transports than he has? Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Branden's mail policies

2005-06-22 Thread Michael Banck
that this might be well out of the hands of those people, their ISP might act like this. Some might even refuse to change their ISP on these terms. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Bug of the month, or how to get people fixing bugs

2002-08-31 Thread Michael Banck
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 06:48:39PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Do you have a log of this discussion ? I'd be interested in the details... I've got a log of the discussion at http://people.debian.org/~mbanck/debbugs-log sorry for the misleading name... HTH, Michael -- Oskuro Overfiend:

Re: Small distribution

2003-01-10 Thread Michael Banck
Hi Sergey, On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:37:02AM -0800, sergey dyshel wrote: I'm want would download your distribution but it contains more than 10 CD's. Do you have a distribution of 1 or 2 CD's which contains only basic set of packages (like compiler, shell, XFree86)? My internet

Re: New project proposal: debian-lex

2003-04-19 Thread Michael Banck
On Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 05:57:42PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: On 19 Apr 2003, Jeremy Malcolm wrote: I am interested in coordinating a new sub-project called Debian-Lex, Could you please explain the naming lex for non English speakers? s/English/Latin/ cheers, Michael

Re: Why free shouldn't have to mean complicated

2003-05-04 Thread Michael Banck
On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 01:24:18AM +0200, Benoit Peccatte wrote: Le lun 05/05/2003 à 00:55, Matt Zimmerman a écrit : On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 12:54:07AM +0200, Felix Steiner wrote: 3. Debian: Took the whole lot of installation-steps but didn't arrive at an end. However -- it crashed

Re: A short survey, really short

2003-05-20 Thread Michael Banck
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 11:42:55AM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: On Monday 19 May 2003 09:42, Biella Coleman wrote: IANADD but I can't let this pass... 9. Which is better?: [ ] Millenium Edition [ ] XP [ ] 2000 [ ] 2000 Pro [ ] 98

Re: Debian CDs

2003-07-05 Thread Michael Banck
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 01:03:09PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do I need all Debian CDs to install Debiuan/GNU Linux. Or will the first one do? Only the first CD is required to install Debian GNU/Linux. You can install the rest of the packages you like via the internet. You can also

Re: [Spi-private] [leader@debian.org: Re: The name of a foundation for Skolelinux/Debian]

2003-09-16 Thread Michael Banck
Uh, this is a bit off-topic, sorry: On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 01:50:18AM +1000, the DPL wrote [This is from Petter Reinholdtsen:] Martin was skeptical I wanted to explain what this statement means in more detail; [...] However, I don't think that Debian should pay programmers. seconded.

Re: About new release

2003-12-15 Thread Michael Banck
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:29:14PM +0100, Jesús Delicado Martínez wrote: The last release of Debian is 3.0r1 in the Fist Feet, but in last news, on 21th November, there is another release stable, the release 3.0r2. So, what is the last stable release? The latest release is indeed 3.0r2. Due to

Re: New FTP-master needed, or other fix.

2003-12-15 Thread Michael Banck
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 04:25:55PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote: On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 07:44:52PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote: On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 05:20, Nathanael Nerode wrote: There have been repeated complaints that new packages sit in the NEW queue for inordinate amounts of

Re: Bug#219545: Proposed packages to remove from testing

2003-12-16 Thread Michael Banck
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 10:01:17AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: See previous complaints. Debian clearly has some serious problems; I personally credited some of them to James Troup once. The surprising part about that was that I was then told by several other people, Well, you've prevented

Re: Older version of linux available?

2003-12-17 Thread Michael Banck
Hi Colin, On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 12:15:59PM -, Colin Gibson (MB Faber) wrote: I would like to try a version of Linux on my computer at home, however, the latest one (9.1) does not work owing to the xfree86 code not supporting the graphics card on my old computer (all else works ok).

Re: Reviews from PI Giessen, LIT Dresden, LWE Frankfurt (Sorry, I'm late)

2003-12-18 Thread Michael Banck
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 03:04:15PM +0100, Alexander Schmehl wrote: [review from Linux World Expo Frankfurt, late October] An other interesting visitor asked for a company, who could provide support for Debian. They were using Debian in some parts of their company, and are quite sufficient. Now

Re: Various ideas for improving the debian project as a whole

2003-12-31 Thread Michael Banck
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 09:46:16AM +0200, Gerber G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) To measure is to know: Is it possible to provide a web page showing more statistical plots about various aspects of the project? (e.g. A bar plot of Number of RC-bugs vs Age of RC-bugs; Another page could even group

Re: Strawpoll on proper usage of @debian.org email address

2004-01-08 Thread Michael Banck
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 07:58:11PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. Using @d.o for dealing with FLOSS with a loose debian-relationship (e.g. reporting a bug/patch in the upstream bug tracker of an unrelated package, posting on mailing lists of projects

Re: Strawpoll on proper usage of @debian.org email address

2004-01-23 Thread Michael Banck
Hello again, On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:19:55PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: Could everbody interested please fill out that small query below and send the answers to me? Thanks a lot to everybody who participated. I recieved around a hundred submission, which is a significant part of the Debian

Results of strawpoll on proper @d.o usage

2004-01-24 Thread Michael Banck
(Resending this with a subject on its own to get it noticed. See the original mail for the GPG signature, I'm AFK right now) On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:19:55PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: Could everbody interested please fill out that small query below and send the answers to me? Thanks a lot

Re: Strawpoll on proper usage of @debian.org email address

2004-01-26 Thread Michael Banck
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 03:10:06PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: I further caution that it is dangerous to draw conclusions on the feelings of the project based on the unauthenticated responses of only a small minority of developers. More than 10% responded. AFAIK, that's way more than in any

Re: Strawpoll on proper usage of @debian.org email address

2004-01-26 Thread Michael Banck
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 03:00:23PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 10:55:30AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: I further caution that it is dangerous to draw conclusions on the feelings of the project based on the unauthenticated responses of only a small minority

Re: unauthorized upload of xfree86 4.3.0-1 to unstable

2004-01-29 Thread Michael Banck
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:17:29AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote: On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 08:59:51PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: Am Mi, den 28.01.2004 schrieb Branden Robinson um 19:04: whether any sort of sanction should take place as a result of these actions, and what standards of

Re: security.debian.org down?

2004-02-03 Thread Michael Banck
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 12:05:32PM +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote: On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 11:49:30AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: It would be very nice if people would actually READ the announcement. Why? Because then they would learn that we cannot update the website without

Re: Change www.debian.org (Was: Re: security.debian.org down?)

2004-02-03 Thread Michael Banck
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 01:29:35PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] host www.debian.org www.debian.org has address 192.25.206.10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] host 192.25.206.10 10.206.25.192.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer gluck.debian.org. [EMAIL PROTECTED] I guess most people

Re: 2nd CFP: FOSDEM DevRoom

2004-02-03 Thread Michael Banck
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:40:43PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: Hi all, Any feedback so far? Due to organizational issues, the Debian DevRoom will be shared with the people from the Free Java community. We agreed on a schedule that gives both groups three hours to talk about subjects

Re: your logo

2004-02-16 Thread Michael Banck
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 11:06:38PM +0100, Gürkan Sengün wrote: On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:34:33 +0100 Christine Hinrichsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello - I have got a very general question: where did you find the white-grey surface of your logo on the desktop - is it a real stone or wall

Re: debian

2004-02-16 Thread Michael Banck
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 04:29:34PM -0800, Carol Badger wrote: We are in need of a PDF viewer which supports the Linux operating system for viewing Microstation CAD converted to PDFs vector files. Our main concern is that the viewer can easily handle large vector format PDFs of 170kb, for

Re: www.Reitturnierplaner.de

2004-02-18 Thread Michael Banck
, sondern der Fehler liegt bei Ihrem Hoster bzw. Webauthor. mfG, Michael Banck -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html

Re: Spam on lists? [was: Re: serious problems with Mr. Troup]

2004-02-23 Thread Michael Banck
post and whether he knew Ingo is going to mail d-d-a? The right place for this discussion would be of course -project, not -devel, so I've Cc'd -project and hopefully set the M-F-T properly. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck

Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates

2004-03-05 Thread Michael Banck
of all proportion. Try talking to the people involved. Huh? She modified the web archives? Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html

Re: Linux ins Rathaus - Linux for german city administration

2004-03-05 Thread Michael Banck
on Debian? (Guadalinux). That's about 80.000 desktops IIRC. Indeed. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html

Proposed transition plan for non-free and call for help

2004-03-09 Thread Michael Banck
[-devel and -vote CCed. Please respect the Mail-Followup-To -project. You should really subscribe to -project, it's not that big. In any case, I will try read and reply to any comment] This document describes a proposal for a transition plan for non-free. Note that I thought about this for quite

Re: Proposed transition plan for non-free and call for help

2004-03-09 Thread Michael Banck
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 02:36:49PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: [-devel and -vote CCed. Please respect the Mail-Followup-To -project. You should really subscribe to -project, it's not that big. In any case, I will try read and reply to any comment] Sorry about the M-F-T. Mutt seems to have

Re: Proposed transition plan for non-free and call for help

2004-03-09 Thread Michael Banck
be felt later on. We're desperatly trying to get real figures here. I'll post them once they are available. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html

Re: Proposed transition plan for non-free and call for help

2004-03-09 Thread Michael Banck
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 07:29:58AM -0700, Kevin Rosenberg wrote: Michael Banck wrote: once non-free is removed from debian.org. In fact, we might try to get non-free.org running even no matter what the outcome of the general resolution will be, provided maintainers are interested in moving

Re: Proposed transition plan for non-free and call for help

2004-03-09 Thread Michael Banck
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 07:48:20PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: What about recomends and suggests of contrib or non-free packages from debian/main ? How should it handle it? How will this separate setup handle this ? What about conflicts ? What do you propose? Michael -- Michael Banck

Re: Proposed transition plan for non-free and call for help

2004-03-10 Thread Michael Banck
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:25:32AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:15:42PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 07:48:20PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: What about recomends and suggests of contrib or non-free packages from debian/main ? How should

Re: Proposed transition plan for non-free and call for help

2004-03-11 Thread Michael Banck
policies for granting uploading access to non-free.org, and what should be the requirements? I'd honestly value your input here. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html

Re: Section gnustep, was: http://packages.debian.org/unstable/

2004-03-17 Thread Michael Banck
in the near future. There's no use in fixing them, as long as they are not *too* broken (cf. gnome/kde/x11). Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html

Re: ????? non-free.

2004-03-19 Thread Michael Banck
-- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html

Re: Section gnustep, was: http://packages.debian.org/unstable/

2004-03-20 Thread Michael Banck
others think about it. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html

Re: Section gnustep, was: http://packages.debian.org/unstable/

2004-03-24 Thread Michael Banck
to have a 'chemistry' section for all of my chemistry-related packages, but right now I'm satisfied with having them in 'science', as I know package tags will solve this eventually. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html

Re: Do we need a debian-infrastructure list?

2004-03-28 Thread Michael Banck
that I'm not subscribed to -devel right now). More general infrastructural messages with permanent or critical impact should still be CC'd to -devel-announce, regardless of -infrastructure, IMHO. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck

Re: Do we need a debian-infrastructure list?

2004-03-28 Thread Michael Banck
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 06:23:58PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: Hi, Am So, den 28.03.2004 schrieb Michael Banck um 16:41: On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 04:06:21PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: I dunno. We *want* -devel-announce to be read be every DD, even the ones which are almost-MIA

Re: Kill the DPL! (Elections are almost over)

2004-04-07 Thread Michael Banck
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 01:15:02AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Debian Project Leader should be changed from an elected position to a yearly award for the most helpfully active Debianer. At the end of the year we will conduct an online vote and give recognition to the one Debianer who

Re: Debian Weekly News - April 27th, 2004

2004-04-28 Thread Michael Banck
is accessable via anonymouse CVS, you should have complained *before* it got published and not whine about the editorials afterwards. scnr (I'm still quite serious though), Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html

Re: ftp2.de.debian.org stable/main Packages

2004-05-14 Thread Michael Banck
einen anderen Mirror nehmen. Einfach /etc/apt/sources.list entsprechend anpassen und apt-get update aufrufen. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html

Re: os debian

2004-05-28 Thread Michael Banck
@lists.debian.org Thanks, Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html

Re: Atualizaçã o de bugs / Update to correct the bugs

2004-06-04 Thread Michael Banck
appropriate than here. Thanks, Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html

RfC: Updated Debian Flyer

2004-06-11 Thread Michael Banck
/flyers/general/?cvsroot=debian -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html

Re: RfC: Updated Debian Flyer

2004-06-11 Thread Michael Banck
. Explaining the situation in the flyer would take too much space and would probably look unfavourable (Uhm, we argued about technical details for a long time, and then it was too late). Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html

Re: RfC: Updated Debian Flyer

2004-06-11 Thread Michael Banck
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 05:30:35PM +0200, Tobias Toedter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 11 June 2004 17:11, Michael Banck wrote: I'm terribly sorry, it seems GMX believes you're a SPAM relay. This is the first time I've had a problem with it. Now

Re: critics on the proposed new flyer

2004-06-16 Thread Michael Banck
controls the +hardware and distributes the system resources to the applications. On top +of the kernel the GNU tools provide applications with a powerful +environment to perform all the basic tasks one expects from an operating +system, hence the name GNU/Linux. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian

Re: Debian, lists and discrimination

2004-08-07 Thread Michael Banck
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 09:38:53AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: The free software world has always benefited from selection pressure and competition between opposing solutions; when some thing does not work as you like, you are encouraged to change it to your liking, and if there

Re: Debian, lists and discrimination

2004-08-07 Thread Michael Banck
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 04:26:01PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Far as I can see, the mailing list has been created by a bunch of volunteers who have an itch to scratch; and while I may not always agree with the decisions taken, or the scoping of the effort, as always people who do the work

Re: Debian t-shirts not kosher!

2004-08-10 Thread Michael Banck
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 06:19:41PM -0700, Jonathan Walther wrote: Who is in charge of Debian t-shirts which we sell at various expositions, fairs, and events? Whoever steps forward for that particular event, there is no central organization, AFAIK. Michael

Re: Debian Hardened project (question about use of the Debian trademark)

2004-09-18 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 01:51:53PM +0200, Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote: Yes, it will take long time to complete ALL the tree, but i have this idea: - We put first the patched GCC Glibc packages (Steve, your 2 cents :D) - We send an advice to the mailing-lists, we write a little

Re: Debian Hardened project (question about use of the Debian trademark)

2004-09-19 Thread Michael Banck
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 09:33:44PM +0200, Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote: The idea (i repeat) is now that the packages should be recompiled, passed to a temporal pool, tested, and then moved to the 'main' pool, without creating branches/sub-trees/brands/etc, and just making all the

Re: Re: wrong meaning of GNU/Linux on Debian Project mainpage

2005-01-05 Thread Michael Banck
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 08:04:24PM -0500, Brian Masinick wrote: Think about it, just as there is Debian GNU/HURD It's the Hurd, not the HURD. cheers, Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html

Re: A new banner for Sarge

2005-07-15 Thread Michael Banck
, but not on -project. thanks, Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: debconf5 - videos of the talks and BOFs available

2005-07-19 Thread Michael Banck
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 12:07:09AM +0300, Holger Levsen wrote: Well, 'nuff said for the moment, dudette, the videos are and will be here: http://dc5video.debian.net Awesome work! Just one question though: Is it planned to provide the videos as OGG/Theora as well? I believe we should (as

Re: dual boot on mac osx and 2wire internet support

2005-11-20 Thread Michael Banck
redirect your question to the debian-user mailing list. The debina-project list is restricted to non-technical topics, sorry. cheers, Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Complaint about #debian operator

2005-12-10 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 02:49:35AM -0800, Josh Rehman wrote: My apologies for sending this message here, but I wasn't sure where to complain. I've been an off-and-on debian user over the years. Lately I've used RedHat at work. I was thinking of trying Debian again, and heard about Ubuntu.

Re: Complaint about #debian operator

2005-12-10 Thread Michael Banck
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 03:00:02AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: On Sat, 10 Dec 2005, Michael Banck wrote: Looking at the log, your question was being addressed for 10 minutes before you were silenced (definetely more than a word or two), and dondelecaro gave you useful input as well. When

Re: Complaint about #debian operator

2005-12-10 Thread Michael Banck
, but me should be very sensitive to this in order to avoid alienating the helpful and good regulars in #debian. cheers, Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Re: Complaint about #debian operator

2005-12-11 Thread Michael Banck
different channels already and even then, they appear rude to bystanders. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Complaint about #debian operator

2005-12-11 Thread Michael Banck
-- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Complaint about #debian operator

2005-12-11 Thread Michael Banck
. This is a Debian mailing list. Please stay courteous or refrain from posting here. Thanks, Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Re: Complaint about #debian operator

2005-12-14 Thread Michael Banck
, this is all their free time and decision. We need to concentrate more on the Utnubu project I guess. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble

Re: Ubuntu/Debian cooperation [was: Complaint about #debian operator]

2005-12-14 Thread Michael Banck
sympathies for the two-dozen-odd MOTUs which are supposed to maintain the 1-odd packages in universe without much help in order to make the whole distribution shine - we should cut them some slack, IMHO. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person

Re: Ubuntu/Debian cooperation [was: Complaint about #debian operator]

2005-12-15 Thread Michael Banck
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 02:12:35PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: That said, it may be different for ubuntu employees and random maintainers. Ubuntu does not have any employees. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Re: Status of mirror split and AMD64

2006-01-06 Thread Michael Banck
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 11:40:23AM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: could the FTP-Team please clairify what the current status of the mirror split and the inclusion of AMD64 is? It has been said this will happen directly after the release of sarge. Sarge is now 7 month out and (to the enduser

Re: Information abount packages.d.o and experimental

2006-01-07 Thread Michael Banck
, Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: For those who care about debian-devel-announce

2006-01-18 Thread Michael Banck
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:44:32PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: Sorry to feed again the troll, but I would like to know what is the rationale behind removing the permissions for Andrew and not for Raphaël. This has nothing to do with the technical aspects of Debian development (too bad the

Re: For those who care about debian-devel-announce

2006-01-18 Thread Michael Banck
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:25:07PM +, Dave Holland wrote: On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:44:32PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: Raphaël has also harmed the project by implicitly linking it to Ubuntu. Don't be ridiculous. Ubuntu explicitly acknowledge that they build on Debian - see

Re: Linux Forums

2006-01-22 Thread Michael Banck
trouble. It is a bit like #debian really, where at some place most DDs had left the channel to itself, which resulted in a bad reputation both for the channel and the project. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html

Re: Linux Forums

2006-01-24 Thread Michael Banck
and participate if we had our own. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Help

2006-01-24 Thread Michael Banck
to post their question. thanks, Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: uol.com.br and petsupermarket

2006-03-14 Thread Michael Banck
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 06:06:59AM -0300, Guilherme de S. Pastore wrote: It only affects the contributors, which might not be a problem, though, as they may quite possibly turn into ex-contributors soon... Which exactly makes it a problem. I hope we lose no valued contributors (including you)

Re: bet there are no senior citizen developers

2006-03-22 Thread Michael Banck
. Please post non-development issues to debian-project next time. Or rethink whether your issue needs posting at all. thanks, Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Keysignings and other meetups (Was: etch before vista)

2006-03-25 Thread Michael Banck
of discussions to debian-project to enhance debian-devel's signal-to-noise ratio with respect to development. thanks, Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe

Re: Reforming the NM process

2006-04-11 Thread Michael Banck
contributions is really necessary, I think several months or sustained contributions are alright, where both measures are up for interpretation depending on the type, quality and quantity of the contributions. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person

Re: Reforming the NM process

2006-04-12 Thread Michael Banck
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:25:28AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Could you report such sponsors, so we may take their sponsorship privileges away? There's no technical way to do this (yet), as far as I can see. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: Reforming the NM process

2006-04-12 Thread Michael Banck
. Also you can probably check the continous contribution through that wiki page's history quite conveniently (though other means make this possible as well of course) Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: Reforming the NM process

2006-04-12 Thread Michael Banck
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 12:43:22PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: * Michael Banck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060412 12:11]: On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:25:28AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Could you report such sponsors, so we may take their sponsorship privileges away? There's

Re: gibc

2006-04-18 Thread Michael Banck
_dl_catch_error, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file ld-linux.so.2 with link time reference in what a problem and how it{her} to correct? Debian-project is not the appropriate place for technical issues like these. Please ask debian-user or file a bug. thanks, Michael -- Michael Banck Debian

Re: irc.debian.org

2006-04-30 Thread Michael Banck
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 04:55:38PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote: If the move is done, the FN channels should be kept open and the topic should redirect users to OFTC. It could just live on like it does now. Then any packages that reference the FN channel should be updated. Packages should mention

Re: irc.debian.org

2006-04-30 Thread Michael Banck
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 07:25:50PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote: On 04/30/2006 05:46 PM, Frans Pop wrote: Just to prove you wrong: what the hell is Jabber? It is an Instant Messaging Client. It is not IRC though, so this point is moot. This thread is about IRC,

  1   2   >