sy to deal with. Those in which harm may or may not have been
intended but in which harm may be perceived are more challenging.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 12:51:19AM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Hello Roberto.
>
> Roberto C. Sánchez - 29.12.18, 18:12:
> > Suppose for a moment that a project member [… hypothetical case …]
> […]
> > The reason I use the above example is because it is a diff
On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 05:50:03PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 15271 March 1977, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> > > And I sometimes remove blogs for them just going 5xx. A commit msg
> > > is fine.
> > I still think an email to the author would be a good thin
corruption. A slur, on the other hand,
might attack someone's race, ethnicity, gender, etc.
"Disparaging statement" might work better, as it would cover both.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
I have built up quite a backlog of email, so I did not see that the
discussion had effectively concluded when I wrote my message.
On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 04:25:14PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 15271 March 1977, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> > Probably better to say something
allows the author something perhaps more
complete than a short sentence fragment in a commit message upon which
to base a decision on how to proceed.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
ocess, fact, or pressure of boycotting; a combining to
withhold or prevent dealing or social intercourse with a
tradesman, employer, etc.; social and business interdiction
for the purpose of coercion.
[1913 Webster]
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 10:47:05AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez writes:
> > On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 10:17:56AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >> Scott Kitterman writes:
>
> >>> If censorship isn't the right word (and at best, it's not id
y from me.
The actions of another only take away what you allow them to take away.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
;Is there a firewall solution at the software level? what is it ?
>Is there a solution using permissions?
>Thank you
To do what you describe requires a mandatory access control system
(SELinux and AppArmor are two popular choices).
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 02:34:30PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez writes ("Re: permissions"):
> > On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 01:40:49PM +0200, nourdebian2...@tutanota.com wrote:
> > >Hi
> > >We thank you very much for your efforts an
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 10:18:18AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Jul 2019, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 05:33:25PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> > > Being german, I think that Debian should honor discriminated minorities,
> >
> >
s as uncomplicated as the suggestions I made above for
Debian to show solidarity with similarly affected groups. I hope that
we can do that with the same enthusiasm as in this instance. There are
sure to be other groups which I have overlooked and hope that additional
suggestions are forthcoming from others.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
ractically invisible (especially for someone monitoring many
Debian-related mailing lists). I would be surprised if more than a very
small handful people even knew such a change was in the works.
Perhaps there should be an effort to better highlight such highly
visible things before they take effect?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
ed minorities,
Being a discriminated against minority, I think Debian should *not*.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 11:59:36AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez writes:
>
> > Hispanic Heritage Month is coming in a few months (at least in the US,
> > not sure about international observances). Perhaps Debian could make a
> > public show of suppo
to be worse now than it was before.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
at a time when it did
not even have national-level anti-discrimination protection for LGBT
people[*] was done in good taste and was a victory for diversity? Sure.
Regards,
-Roberto
[*] Such protections have since been enacted.
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
and clearly stated that there would be no escalation if the Montreal
event team decided to ignore his request?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
preferences of the poll respondents. That seems less
inclusive rather than more inclusive.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 06:01:40PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Roberto C. Sánchez (2019-12-26 17:29:52)
> > On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 04:30:58PM +0100, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> > > On Thu, 26 Dec 2019, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > > >So, what does
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 08:53:43AM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> So, what can we, as the wider community of Debian Developers, do to
> help?
Replying to myself.
I recognize that this thread contains varying suggestions as to how to
improve the situation. My question should hav
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 04:30:58PM +0100, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2019, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> >So, what does the FTP team consider that we, as the wider community
> >of Debian Developers, can do to help?
>
> What about being
), the second of the above scenarios seems to be
by far the more sustainable and productive approach from the long-term
perspective.
So, what can we, as the wider community of Debian Developers, do to
help?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
T-like licenses which mention the copyright holder usually as the
first thing in the in license text. Could those be combined into a
single stanza in the way you describe?
Also, I assume that it is good practice to verify actual license texts
included by upstream against known good sources since that seems like
something FTP masters would have to do as well. Is that correct?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
minimize them would
go a long way to reducing the likelihood of flame responses to rejection
mails.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
ng passed through the various qualifications
to be a DD and be accepted by the project.
In any event, it is just a random idea that I had. It is not clear if
such an approach is even feasible or desirable.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
gh, that OpenJDK 7 is end of life at this point that
that using it for public Internet-facing services or other untrusted
environments will become increasingly less safe as new vulnerabilities
are discovered.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
cts
> OUTSIDE of Debian. The Debian project is not your echo chamber for
> your activism.
>
Thank you for posting this. I did not respond to the initial message
because it was difficult for me to do so constructively. You have
captured the essence of how I feel about this. Let's remain focused
t the existence of the
Code of Conduct would eventually lead to its abuse and weaponization
may have in fact been well founded.
Regards,
-Roberto
[0] https://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 02:35:18PM -0400, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 2:29 PM Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > The reasons why the FTP masters might reject a package from the archive
> > are public [0]. Nowhere on the list is there an entry that says
> &
values. However, I am not arguing for continued
inclusion of these packages based on values. Rather, I am arguing
against setting (continuing?) a precedent of improper removal of
packages.
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
Hi Wouter,
I think that you and I are actually in agreement.
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 06:06:34PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 02:28:22PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 07:11:11PM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> > > >
other violence toward
individuals and groups, supported those who have engaged in such
activities, or been otherwise complicit in such.
So, let's at least be consistent.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
tially #2. See the wiki [0] for details. Note that
your query is more appropriate for a user-focused list, rather than this
list which is about non-technical project matters.
Regards,
-Roberto
[0] https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
s". I don't think we'd be
able to conjure up a better double entendre. Of course, if anyone has
other suggestions, let's hear them.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
e high for
> rejecting software from Debian based on the ideas it expresses.
>
I wholeheartedly agree with this and I would like to express my support
for it.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
is superior to whatever it must displace in your own worldview
because (insert reasons)", then I would find that much more forthright
than what we go around doing now.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
ebian
does not mean that Debian as an organization supports all of the various
ideologies entailed therein.
Neither does the presence of the anarchism and fortune-anarchism
packages mean that the Debian project supports anarchy.
In other words, lets at least be consistent.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
to analyze all the data and
the comments to see how fellow developers and contributors felt about
verious things.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
ities search tool at
>[3]https://apps.irs.gov/app/eos/
>Lex Romanczuk
>[4]lex355...@gmail.com
>
You will want to send your donation through Software in the Public
Interest (which is a 501(c)(3) organization), as detailed here:
https://www.debian.org/donations
Regards,
r survey able to help you gain context about how the
Debian Project functions. This, by extension, impacts a number of the
factors which are within your research interest.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/04/msg1.html
Best wishes on your research efforts.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
, not a personal attack).
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 04:40:34PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Roberto C. Sánchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg, as a piece of friendly advice, I think it would be wise to drop
it. You continue to do your reputation harm by going around making this
claim. Does Debian's fork somehow
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 06:53:43PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Roberto C. Sánchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- the fact that other Debian maintainers does not try to
find a workaround for the problems caused by some outcasts
causes damage to the reputation of the Debian project
be
subscribed to the list.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 09:00:20PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Roberto C. Sánchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess you missed Aurelien's mail [0]? What about the other distros?
Mail not addressed to me is send py people who are not interested
in an answer from me
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 10:51:04PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Roberto C. Sánchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not have the unlimited time to waste with useless speudo
discussions. I am sorry, but this will be the last response to you
unless you start to open your mind to the reality
argument of some sort, the response is go find it yourself or go
figure it out yourself (or words to that effect).
You should not be surprised.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello,
I notice that Debian Weekly News is still called Debian Weekly News,
even though it is not published weekly. Perhaps we should consider
changing the name to something like the Debian Newsletter?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http
3) The date my key was added to the keyring
I guess that depends on what you consider joined. You might also
consider your first posting to a Debian mailing list. Or possible, your
first contribution (e.g., bug submission or patch submission).
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http
would be an appropriate way?
By spending the day arguing about whether users or free software are the
more important priority? ;)
If we lived in the matrix, the users could *be* free software. That
would simplify things a bit. :-)
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http
particular reason why it must be gender neutral?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
of the plan are not hidden to you. They are stated
and/or derived from the original post to d-d-a. What is hidden (and
what you are apparently seeking) is the motivations.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
less time to process, which usually works pretty well.
I am wondering if this code change resulted in the random requeuing of
libtzinfo-ruby after it had already spent 2 weeks in NEW. I uploaded it
and libmemcache-client-ruby at the same time.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http
a new binary component.
Both were brand new source packages.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
/releases/sarge/
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
57 matches
Mail list logo
