Le mardi 18 octobre 2005 à 02:57 +0200, Martin v. Löwis a écrit :
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Apart from a typo and the FSF address, the changes are about which
packaging variants are mandated, recommending to provide only one
python-foo package for each module, except when depending
To what cost? How many gigabytes of mirror space and bandwidth are we
wasting with python2.X-libprout stuff nobody ever uses?
I don't know. What is the answer to this question? I wouldn't expect
it to be more than 1GiB per mirror, though, likely much less. On
i386, for example, the useless
Le mardi 18 octobre 2005 à 10:24 +0200, Martin v. Löwis a écrit :
Even in a situation like the current one, when we're stuck with 2.3 as
the default when there's 2.4 available, there are only a few python
packages which actually need the 2.4 version.
What do you mean, actually need?
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 08:23, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 18 octobre 2005 à 02:57 +0200, Martin v. Löwis a écrit :
Josselin Mouette wrote:
[...]
But I'm not talking about python-gtk here, I'm talking about those
hundreds of modules actually used by zero or one binary packages. Do we
need
4 matches
Mail list logo
