Re: Packaging new version of ZODB (Zope Object Database)

2016-11-01 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Julien Muchembled wrote: > Bug#842870: ITP: zodbpickle -- Fork of pickle module, for ZODB Please ensure the security team are informed about this fork, via their embedded-code-copies file: https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies -- bye, pabs

Python 4 and ‘python3’ (was: /usr/bin/python2 shebangs)

2016-11-01 Thread Ben Finney
Donald Stufft writes: > /usr/bin/python3 being Python 4.x is a bit weird though Seriously? Who is proposing that? > and it’s likely that Python 4.x is not going to be another break the > world release. Certainly the command ‘python3’ should only ever point to the Python 3

Re: Packaging new version of ZODB (Zope Object Database)

2016-11-01 Thread Arnaud Fontaine
Hi, > I write to debian-python, because some of the involved packages are > not specific to Zope. Actually, I even think that ZODB itself is not > specific to Zope, but well, changing section of existing packages can > be another topic. This has already been discussed but all the

Re: /usr/bin/python2 shebangs

2016-11-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On November 1, 2016 8:43:50 PM EDT, Donald Stufft wrote: > >> On Nov 1, 2016, at 6:03 PM, Scott Kitterman >wrote: >> >> Even after python2.7 is removed from Debian, there will still be >users who >> keep a local copy because they couldn't migrate

Re: Packaging new version of ZODB (Zope Object Database)

2016-11-01 Thread Julien Muchembled
Le 11/01/16 à 20:10, Julien Muchembled a écrit : > * python-btrees & python-zodbpickle (done) > https://github.com/zopefoundation/BTrees > https://github.com/zopefoundation/zodbpickle > > - new packages > - Debian Python Modules Team > > [...] > > * python-zeo (not started) >

Re: /usr/bin/python2 shebangs

2016-11-01 Thread Donald Stufft
> On Nov 1, 2016, at 6:03 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > Even after python2.7 is removed from Debian, there will still be users who > keep a local copy because they couldn't migrate things due to $REASONS. Re- > using /usr/bin/python for a python3 version won't

Re: /usr/bin/python2 shebangs

2016-11-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, November 01, 2016 05:14:21 PM Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Nov 01, 2016, at 11:34 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >I don't think /usr/bin/python should ever point to a python3 version. It > >should be dropped when python2.7 is removed. I think the existence of > >/usr/bin/python2 is a

Re: /usr/bin/python2 shebangs

2016-11-01 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Nov 01, 2016, at 11:34 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >I don't think /usr/bin/python should ever point to a python3 version. It >should be dropped when python2.7 is removed. I think the existence of >/usr/bin/python2 is a limited to a work around for a specific distros >insanity. There's no

Packaging new version of ZODB (Zope Object Database)

2016-11-01 Thread Julien Muchembled
Hello, I am co-maintaining the 'zodb' package and I am also an upstream developer. http://www.zodb.org/ - a native object database for Python Debian currently packages branch 3.x of ZODB, which is getting quite old, with only support for Python 2. It's been a while that I am working locally

Re: /usr/bin/python2 shebangs

2016-11-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On November 1, 2016 10:28:01 AM EDT, Barry Warsaw wrote: >Over in #834193, a user is asking for a /usr/bin/pip2 to mirror >/usr/bin/pip >because some uses cases apparently prefer pip2 over pip. That seems >like a >reasonable request on the face of it, and easy to support. >

/usr/bin/python2 shebangs

2016-11-01 Thread Barry Warsaw
Over in #834193, a user is asking for a /usr/bin/pip2 to mirror /usr/bin/pip because some uses cases apparently prefer pip2 over pip. That seems like a reasonable request on the face of it, and easy to support. However, I thought, well why not shebang pip2 to /usr/bin/python2 because 1) it would