G'day,
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 10:34:05PM +0100, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
Hi,
I have now finished Debianizing eGenix mx BASE (based on patch done by
Federico Di Gregorio, see bug#56):
http://www.lemburg.com/files/python/eGenix-mx-Extensions.html
The upstream maintainer of the mx
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 01:27:22PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 08:32:33AM -0700, Neil Schemenauer wrote:
Anthony Towns wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 10:13:17AM +0200, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
Say, you would install 2.1.2 in /usr/local.
How about we just say
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 02:42:42PM +0200, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
* Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au [011023 09:07]:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 01:31:50AM -0400, David M. Cooke wrote:
At some point, Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
[...]
Just to make the discussion a little bit
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 01:42:12AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 10:59:45PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
[...]
Uh, how many scripts rely on python 1.5? If Debian's main python is 2.1,
why should a python 1.5 script remain available? I can't see any reason
for this, and I
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 10:27:54AM +1300, Carey Evans wrote:
Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
exactly. But you see that these packages will break when you try to
upgrade. We can't make 2.1 the default right now, because we will
_silently_ break packages. Before python can
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for more info, including pgp key
--
#! /bin/sh -e
#
# postinst script for the Debian python2.1-base package.
# Written 1998 by Gregor Hoffleit [EMAIL PROTECTED].
# Modified 2001 by Donovan Baarda [EMAIL PROTECTED
Quoting Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
With the last python-1.5.2-18.2 NMU we have non-conflicting python1.5,
2.0 and 2.1 packages in unstable, not more not less.
Here two proposals, how to go further on. The first proposal is a
safer proposal (but needs more uploads and needs loong).
Quoting Bruce Sass [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
On 16 Oct 2001, Jérôme Marant wrote:
...
I installed both python1.5 and python2.1. And installing both on the
same
system broke _all_ my python 1.5 packages: this is the alternative
issue
Perl people have warned us about.
I didn't
Quoting Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Anthony Towns writes:
] python-2.1_2.1.1
] python_2.1.1 (depends on python-2.1) (does ln
/usr/bin/python{2.1,})
] python-2.1-module_version (depends on python-2.1)
] python-module_version (depends on python and
python-2.1-module)
Hrm.
Quoting Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Donovan Baarda writes:
Some other questions;
what happens with other packages that might/might not have installed
stuff into /usr/lib/python1.5? Will they break?
No. However the priority of the python alternative from 1.5 should
greater than
G'day,
Hope you don't mind me Cc'ing to you guys. Let me know if you don't like it and
I'll stop.
Quoting Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
Open issue(s):
- didn't handle the conversion/recompilation of /usr/local python
packages.
Some other questions;
what happens with other
Quoting Neil Schemenauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jim Penny wrote:
[...]
The python is a small package to create a link from /usr/bin/python2.2
to /usr/bin/python. python-eggs is a dummy package for dependencies
(similar to what is done for GCC). When we upgrade Python to 2.2 we
have:
Quoting Neil Schemenauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Donovan Baarda wrote:
Packages like extension modules _are_ tied to a particular version and
hence
should be in a python-X.Y-foo package that installs into
/usr/lib/pythonX.Y.
There would also be an empty package python-foo that simply
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 11:10:43PM -0700, Neil Schemenauer wrote:
Carey Evans wrote:
By way of example, suppose I have a package spam that embeds Python
2.1, and therefore depends on python-2.1. spam also uses the eggs
module, and therefore depends on python-eggs, which depends on
G'day debian-python,
Just read the DWN, saw mention of the Python policy, read it, and subscribed to
this list to throw in some comments. I note that the policy was posted some
time ago, so these comments might be too late.
First off, you need to clarify what you are attempting to achieve.
101 - 115 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
