(Trimming To/Cc list to debian-python and the maintainers involved)
Ileana - this email relates to python-limits, for which you made the
last change
Sandro - this email relates to your package prettytable
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 08:47:24AM +0200, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
> [...]
> I made a
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 06:55:50AM +0200, Antonio Valentino wrote:
> Dear Alexandre
> [...]
> >
> > I made a mistake in my attempt too..., here's the real list:
> >
> > Maintainer: Sandro Tosi
> > Package: prettytable
> >
> > Maintainer: Debian GIS Project
> > -> CC'ing Antonio
> > Package:
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 11:07:54PM +0200, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
> Le lun. 13 mai 2024 à 22:59, Scott Kitterman a écrit :
> > >I suggest that we soon ask ftpmaster to drop pytest-lazy-fixture from
> > >Debian unstable.
> >
> > Please transition all the rdepends first. Asking before that's
Hi!
Background:
debugpy vendors pydevd (which in turn vendors an old version of
bytecode).
Until version 1.8.0 of debugpy (currently in testing), the vendored
copy of pydevd was (almost) identical to the separately published
pydevd, so I had replaced the vendored version of pydevd with the
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 03:58:21PM -0400, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> I noticed one package affected by this issue, prettytable, has
> switched to a fork, pytest-lazy-fixtures (note the s at the end of the
> name).
>
> Would someone like to package this for Debian to fix several packages
> failing to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Gilbey
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org,
1063...@bugs.debian.org
* Package name: pytest-lazy-fixtures
Version : 1.0.7
Upstream Contact: Petrov Anton
* URL : https://github.com
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Gilbey
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org
* Package name: sphinxcontrib-openapi
Version : 0.8.4
Upstream Author : Ihor Kalnytskyi
* URL : https://github.com/sphinx-contrib/openapi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Gilbey
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org
* Package name: sphinxcontrib-emojicodes
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : Copyright: The Sphinx Emoji Codes contributors
* URL : https
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Gilbey
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org
* Package name: rfc3986-validator
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Nicolas Aimetti
* URL : https://github.com/naimetti/rfc3986-validator
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Gilbey
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org
* Package name: rfc3339-validator
Version : 0.1.4
Upstream Author : Nicolas Aimetti
* URL : https://github.com/naimetti/rfc3339-validator
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Gilbey
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-overrides
Version : 7.7.0
Upstream Author : Copyright: Mikko Korpela
* URL : https://github.com/mkorpela/overrides
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Gilbey
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-isoduration
Version : 20.11.0+git20211126.ae0bd61
Upstream Author : Víctor Muñoz
* URL : https://github.com
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Gilbey
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org
* Package name: pytest-mypy-testing
Version : 0.1.3
Upstream Author : Copyright: David Fritzsche
* URL : https://github.com/davidfritzsche
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Gilbey
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-fqdn
Version : 1.5.1
Upstream Author : ypcrts
* URL : https://github.com/ypcrts/fqdn
* License : MPL-2.0
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Gilbey
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org
* Package name: pytest-console-scripts
Version : 1.4.1
Upstream Author : Vasily Kuznetsov
* URL : https://github.com/kvas-it/pytest
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Gilbey
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org
* Package name: jupyter-server-terminals
Version : 0.5.3
Upstream Author : Jupyter Development Team
* URL : https://github.com/jupyter
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Gilbey
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org
* Package name: picobox
Version : 4.0.0
Upstream Author : Ihor Kalnytskyi
* URL : https://github.com/ikalnytskyi/picobox
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Gilbey
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org
* Package name: async-asgi-testclient
Version : 1.4.11
Upstream Author : Jordi Masip
* URL : https://github.com/vinissimus/async-asgi
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 02:16:39PM +0200, tho...@goirand.fr wrote:
> The bug is about the --pristine-tar option of bgp...
>> It turns out that doing pristine-tar by hand often gives different
>> results, as I discovered:
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065445
Yes,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 10:21:06PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> [...]
> > [0]: https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging#Creating_a_new_package
> > [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging#New_upstream_release
> I would not do this way, but use gbp import-orig instead. I'm not sure why
Hi Diane,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 08:59:39PM -0700, Diane Trout wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> On Sat, 2024-03-30 at 20:22 +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Lovely to hear from you, and oh wow, that's amazing, thank you!
> >
> > I can't speak for anyone else, but I suggest th
Hi Diane,
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 11:49:07AM -0700, Diane Trout wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-03-25 at 18:17 +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> >
> >
> > So this is a plea for anyone looking for something really helpful to
> > do: it would be great to have a group of
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 11:36:55AM +0100, Timo Röhling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 27. März 2024 10:59:46 MEZ schrieb Julian Gilbey :
> >I'm stymied by a pytest-related bug. I thought it was a bug in a
> >particular pytest plugin (pytest-order), but it's now shown up in
> >an
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 11:36:55AM +0100, Timo Röhling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 27. März 2024 10:59:46 MEZ schrieb Julian Gilbey :
> >I'm stymied by a pytest-related bug. I thought it was a bug in a
> >particular pytest plugin (pytest-order), but it's now shown up in
> >an
I'm stymied by a pytest-related bug. I thought it was a bug in a
particular pytest plugin (pytest-order), but it's now shown up in
another pytest plugin as well, so I wonder if either there's a bug in
pytest 8.x or something subtle has changed that requires a
modification to the plugins. I
Hi all,
[NB: sent to d-science, d-python, d-devel and the RFP bug; reply-to
set to d-science and the RFP bug only]
An update on Apache Arrow, and in particular the Python library
PyArrow. For those who don't know:
Apache Arrow is a development platform for in-memory analytics. It
contains
I'm trying to package jupyter-server-terminals, and have hit a snag.
The pyproject.toml file includes the lines:
[tool.hatch.build.targets.wheel.shared-data]
"jupyter-config" = "etc/jupyter/jupyter_server_config.d"
but the resulting file is installed at
/usr/etc/jupyter/jupyter_server_config.d
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Gilbey
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org
* Package name: pytest-jupyter
Version : 0.9.1
* URL : https://github.com/jupyter-server/pytest-jupyter
* License : BSD-3-clause
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org
cython-legacy was introduced as a transitional measure until cython
version 3.x was supported by all source packages using cython.
There are now no
Hi Christian,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 01:29:55PM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> Thanks for working on the documentation!
>
> Op Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 10:54:43AM + schreef c.bu...@posteo.jp:
> > Hello,
> > [...]
>
> I can answer some of your questions, but not all of
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 10:04:42AM +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 06:20:11AM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > [...]
> Thanks for collecting the list of packages. I'm planning to adopt these:
>
> > #1065327 O: python-levenshtein -- extension
Dear all (and Bcc-ing the RM bugs),
For information, here is a list of packages that morph has either
requested removal of or orphaned. If you are interested in taking one
or more of them on, that would be great!
Removal requested:
#1066146 RM: flask-basicauth -- ROM; RC buggy, dead
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 07:55:55AM +0100, Roland Mas wrote:
> Hi Julian, Ghislain, list,
>
> I'm working on various Qt-related Python packages, and I'm seeing strange
> errors when building in cowbuilder chroots (with git-buildpackage). They
> don't seem to happen when building out-of-chroot. So
On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 06:46:52PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Same for me. Thanks for proposal. +1
> Anton
> Am Sa., 9. März 2024 um 17:51 Uhr schrieb Nilesh Patra :
>
> I am late to the party but I agree with the policy change.
Following on from some earlier discussions, I've been thinking
Hello,
Please could someone with the required permissions delete the
following two empty salsa repositories; due to an upstream
reorganisation of the package, they will no longer be needed, and will
instead be part of the rapidfuzz package:
Hi Jeroen,
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 08:48:33PM +0100, Jeroen Ploemen wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 18:32:54 +
> Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> > While I do take advantage of this for a few packages, I don't
> > personally care much either way. I suspect that packages will be
> > removed from
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 09:05:44AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [...]
+1 from me, too. I had completely forgotten this paragraph in the
Python policy and it doesn't make that much sense. I personally
generally do send an email to anyone in the "Maintainers" field or the
last uploader
Hi Timo,
And the transition is now complete :-)
Best wishes,
Julian
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 05:45:04PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Hi Timo,
>
> Please can we hold back on uploading pytest 8 to unstable until the
> current Python 3.12 transition is complete? It is entir
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 08:43:03AM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 at 14:38, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > We're nearly there (the transition page says it's 99% done), and when
> > this transition is complete, then python3-defaults 3.11.6+ will b
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 08:50:55PM +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> On 22/01/2024 11:51, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Please could we wait until the "Python 3.12 is a supported version"
> > transition is completed?
>
> How are you defining that? python3-d
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 03:29:21PM +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> Control: severity 1053943 1053939 1053942 1044053 1044056 serious
> Control: severity 1044074 1053946 1044078 1044079 1044077 serious
> Control: severity 1044071 1044067 1044068 1044055 1044060 serious
> Control: severity 1044072
Hi Timo,
Please can we hold back on uploading pytest 8 to unstable until the
current Python 3.12 transition is complete? It is entirely possible
that several of the packages that currently break with pytest 8
already have newer upstream versions that address these issues, but
it's probably not
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 01:22:54PM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm stuck at this odd behavior:
> when I build a package in my current environment (debian/testing),
> sphinx-build ... works correctly.
> when building in sbuild, sphinx-build doesn't find current module:
> ModuleNotFoundError:
FYI: I'm most of the way through updating dask and dask.distributed to
fix their FTBFS bug reports. I hope to upload either tomorrow or
Wednesday. I haven't pushed anything to salsa yet.
Happy new year!
Julian
On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 04:23:46PM +, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> As part of preparing for Python 3.12 in Debian, I've uploaded cython 3
> to experimental.
> [...]
>
> So, that's 71 regressions with cython3. dd-list below. Please help us
> port to cython 3. If this isn't possible, Graham is
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 08:06:41PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > [...]
> > Excellent - I didn't know about that. Are you OK for me to upload
> > versions of cython and cython-legacy which depend on this to fix the
> > Python 3.12 breakage?
>
> not for cython, which won't need that soonish for
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 04:34:17PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 11.12.23 16:19, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 08:09:31AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > You could package a non-conflicting cython-legacy, however that would
> >
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 08:09:31AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> [...]
> You could package a non-conflicting cython-legacy, however that would
> require more changes, also how to build it.
Hi Matthias,
Unfortunately, at least some of cython3-legacy doesn't currently work
with Python 3.12, and
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 08:09:31AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> [...]
> > > > I find that there's also a significant issue with relying on
> > > > cython3-legacy: it conflicts with cython3, meaning that it will be
> > > > impossible to simultaneously install packages depending on cython3 and
> >
Hi Kingsley,
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 12:55:43PM -0800, Kingsley G. Morse Jr. wrote:
> Hi Rebecca, Julian and all science minded pythonistas of debian, great and
> small!
>
> I like your correspondence about upgrading from
> version 1.5 of pandas to 2.1.
>
> It's open, scientific and explores
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 01:06:01PM +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> I'd like to move forward with the pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 transition reasonably
> soon.
>
> Given that pandas 2.x is *not* required for Python 3.12 (but is required for
> Cython 3.0), should we wait for the Python 3.12 transition to
On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 04:23:46PM +, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> As part of preparing for Python 3.12 in Debian, I've uploaded cython 3
> to experimental.
> [...]
>
> So, that's 71 regressions with cython3. dd-list below. Please help us
> port to cython 3. If this isn't possible, Graham is
On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 04:23:46PM +, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> [...]
> So, that's 71 regressions with cython3. dd-list below. Please help us
> port to cython 3. If this isn't possible, Graham is preparing a
> cython-legacy package, to help the stragglers. But we're expecting that
> this won't
On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 08:05:45AM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> As a followup question, I have noticed that a lot of packages (including
> electrum, which I have recently started maintaining) ship the egg-info
> directory. Looking through /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/, this is common
> but
>
Hi Agathe,
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 09:46:00AM +0200, Agathe Porte wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> 2023-07-28 10:59 CEST, Julian Gilbey:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Julian Gilbey
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, Debian Python
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 09:23:17AM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Aug 2023, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > Am Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 01:42:53PM +0100 schrieb Julian Gilbey:
> > > I'm sure I'm not the only one who received a whole bunch of bugs
> > > entitle
I'm sure I'm not the only one who received a whole bunch of bugs
entitled "Fails to build source after successful build" last weekend.
There was one theme common to most of them: the presence of a
*.egg-info directory which was not cleaned by debian/rules clean.
I know the bug report said that
Hi Diane,
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 10:05:53AM -0700, Diane Trout wrote:
> > >
> >
> > Thanks so much! I see you've already started on dask :)
> >
> > I took at quick look at arrow - yikes! There is potentially work
> > afoot on this though:
> >
Hi Diane (and cc'ing the correct mailing list - oops!),
On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 09:37:48AM -0700, Diane Trout wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 14:02 +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Hi Diane,
> >
> > I just got emails telling me that some of my packages would be
> > remov
On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 04:22:11PM -0500, Jorge Moraleda wrote:
> Jeremy, Thank you for your quick reply!
>
> I did not know about `sudo pip install --break-system-packages foo` or `sudo
> rm
> /usr/lib/python3.11/EXTERNALLY-MANAGED` (Frankly I only knew about this issue
> what I have read on
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 12:31:23PM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> Op Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 05:52:21AM + schreef Danial Behzadi دانیال بهزادی:
> > Does it worth trying to package pyenv for Debian? Ain't it against any
> > rules?
>
> See "ITP pyenv" @ http://bugs.debian.org/978149 .
Oh,
Hi Andrey,
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 11:53:33AM +0100, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 01:50:34PM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Our social contract #4 says "Our priorities are our users and free
> > software". What benefits would having the
Hi Michael,
On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 02:29:10PM +0100, Michael Kesper wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> Am 05.02.23 um 11:38 schrieb Julian Gilbey:
> > Why is the current intention not to ship the python3.10 package in
> > bookworm?
>
> Because it would amount to about do
On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 02:41:08PM +, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Julian (2023.02.05_10:38:23_+)
>
> > Why is the current intention not to ship the python3.10 package in
> > bookworm?
>
> Because we aim to have a single Python release supported in every stable
> release.
I am not
How about using Buster and
> 3.9 if 3.11 doesn't work (yet) for you ?
>
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)
> On Feb 5, 2023 11:38, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> >
> > Why is the current intention not to ship the python3.10 package in
> > bookworm?
> >
> > I was trying to
Why is the current intention not to ship the python3.10 package in
bookworm?
I was trying to run some experiments in a virtual environment a few
days ago, and it turns out that several of the Python packages I
needed do not yet run on Python 3.11. I was saved by being able to
run in a Python
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 09:08:01AM +0100, Tomasz Rybak wrote:
> Hello.
> After fixing #1016031 "psycopg3: binary package name should be python3-
> psycopg"
> (I renamed package names, full changes:
> * python3-psycopg3 -> python3-psycopg
> * python3-psycopg3-pool -> python3-psycopg-pool
> *
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 05:05:39PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to create a multi-source tarball for scipy in its experimental
> branch[1]. Upstream includes a set of git submodules in its build
> process. I intended to merge all these submodules in a single
>
On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 07:34:59PM +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Typically though doesn't the python interpreter package provide modules that
> are now incorporated? If python3.11 provides python3-tomli, won't that mess
> this up?
In this case, it doesn't; the Python 3.11 standard library
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 07:14:40PM +, Guðjón Guðjónsson wrote:
> Hi list
> I am working on eric and I do have a problem with the lintian requirement to
> replace the jquery.js file with the debian provided jquery.js file.
> The upstream author pointed out that it doesn't work as well and I
Hi Jochen,
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 04:53:58PM +0100, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> * Julian Gilbey [2022-12-19 09:41]:
> > Quick update: with the updating of python3-bytecode from 0.13 to 0.14
> > in unstable/testing, which allows it to handle Python 3.11, some
On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 06:02:58PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 04:10:05PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > On 12/13/22 13:34, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > If Python 3.11 is the default, then it is highly likely that Spyder
> > > will not
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 04:10:05PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 12/13/22 13:34, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > If Python 3.11 is the default, then it is highly likely that Spyder
> > will not be included: debugpy, which is a dependency of Spyder and
> > python3-ipykerne
Hi Graham,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 11:51:11PM +, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Dear Python Team
>
> Looking at the current state of the 'adding Python 3.11 as a supported
> version' transition [1], the tracker [2] shows only 12 red packages
> (excluding unknowns and packages not in testing)
On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 06:24:48AM +, Guðjón Guðjónsson wrote:
> Hi list
> I am working on eric and I made a mistake while updating the git repository.
> Some paths have changed so files were not excluded correctly and now upstream
> and pristine-tar contain jquery*.js files.
> How can I
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 12:21:38AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 11/22/22 17:59, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > > Or should we mark them as X-Python3-Version: << 3.11 so they can stay in
> > > > testing as long as Python 3.10 is the default?
> > >
> &g
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 05:01:03PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > If there are people with the expertise to help upstream update
> > bytecode and parso (and probably several other low-level packages) for
> > 3.11 so that the software that depends on them works with 3.11, then
> > fine. (And it
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 09:22:05AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > this, 100 times
>
> I very much don't agree. I think it's going pretty well, and the number of
> breakage isn't high. We just need a little bit of effort to make it in good
> enough shape.
> [...]
> Now, out of *many* of my
Dear all,
A strange one. I've uploaded pydevd version 2.9.2+ds-4 to unstable.
It turned out that many of the package tests fail on s390x with Python
3.11 but pass on all of the other architectures. I really don't
understand the internals of the package (it's pretty low-level stuff)
and I have
I've been having a somewhat interesting time with the python3.11-add
transition. Python 3.11 has made some significant changes to its
bytecode representation, and also changed some of it's internal data
structures related to frames quite significantly.
In my corner of the Python world, several
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Gilbey
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org
* Package name: pylint-venv
Version : 2.3.0
Upstream Author : Jan Gosmann , Federico Jaramillo
* URL : https://github.com/jgosmann
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 01:52:09PM +0200, Iñaki Malerba wrote:
> [...]
> > Perhaps there's an opportunity to automate and getting wider CI usage.
>
> One of the biggest issues we had when a team adopted the pipeline was
> DDOSing of the instance because of the multiple pipelines generated when
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Gilbey
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org
* Package name: jarowinkler
Version : 1.2.1
Upstream Author : Max Bachmann
* URL : https://github.com/maxbachmann/JaroWinkler
* License
On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 10:00:49AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Julian Gilbey
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-de...@lists.debian.org,
> debian-python@lists.debian.org
>
> * Package name: rapidfuzz
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Gilbey
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-de...@lists.debian.org,
debian-python@lists.debian.org
* Package name: rapidfuzz
Version : 2.6.1
Upstream Author : Max Bachmann
* URL : https://github.com
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Gilbey
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org
* Package name: rapidfuzz-capi
Version : 1.0.5
Upstream Author : Max Bachmann
* URL : https://github.com/maxbachmann/rapidfuzz_capi
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 07:33:07PM +0200, Gregor Riepl wrote:
> > I: python3-pyxdameraulevenshtein: hardening-no-bindnow
> > [usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pyxdameraulevenshtein.cpython-310-x86_64-linux-gnu.so]
> >
> > and there is nothing about CFLAGS or the like in the setup.py file.
> > So if
Hi!
A package I maintain within the team (python3-pyxdameraulevenshtein)
gives the following lintian message:
I: python3-pyxdameraulevenshtein: hardening-no-bindnow
[usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pyxdameraulevenshtein.cpython-310-x86_64-linux-gnu.so]
The debian/rules file is very bland,
On Sun, Aug 14, 2022 at 11:38:10AM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > It's a salsa webhook:
> > https://wiki.debian.org/Salsa/Doc#Dealing_with_Debian_BTS_from_commit_messages
> >
> > We don't have tooling that automatically configures all the repos, but
> > when we migrated to salsa, we set them all up
On Sun, Aug 14, 2022 at 08:49:06AM +, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Julian (2022.08.14_07:41:26_+)
> > I don't know how many packages in Debian would be broken by the move
> > to 3.0.0; that may be something worth exploring. It may well be that
> > approach (2) makes most sense for the short
On Sun, Aug 14, 2022 at 08:45:32AM +, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Julian (2022.08.14_07:18:49_+)
> > A question of curiosity: when I push a commit to salsa with a "Closes:
> > #n" in the changelog, the BTS gets a "tag: pending" notification.
> > I looked and looked, and could not find
Dear all,
I am intending to package a new dependency of textdistance called
rapizfuzz (along with its dependencies jarowinkler and rapizfuzz-capi,
and including rapizfuzz-cpp and jarowinkler-cpp within the packages).
It's relatively low priority though (and I haven't filed ITPs yet).
But it needs
A question of curiosity: when I push a commit to salsa with a "Closes:
#n" in the changelog, the BTS gets a "tag: pending" notification.
I looked and looked, and could not find out how salsa does this?
Could anyone enlighten me? (The standard debian-ci scripts, which the
repositories use for
On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 09:32:19PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > I'd be wary about 2.2 and 2.3. I have several packages where I know
> > that an automated test will fail; there are all sorts of weird cases
> > [...]
>
> I'd be wary about add
On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 07:45:12PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 10:26:33AM -0400, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> > The way I see it:
> >
> > 1. We should have a Lintian tag for packages not using the new
> > pybuild-autodep8 autopkgte
On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 10:26:33AM -0400, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> The way I see it:
>
> 1. We should have a Lintian tag for packages not using the new
> pybuild-autodep8 autopkgtest. It would be even better if this tag would be a
> pointed hint that identified 'manually' written unit
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 11:50:19AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> I think the notes did not capture the consensus correctly. The point was
> that it should be possible to automate updating the `Testsuite:` field
> to run tests with pybuild-autopkgtest, and that we should probably do
> that
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 07:52:19PM +0200, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> == pybuild improvements ==
>
> getting the autopkgtest MR in would be great
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/dh-python/-/merge_requests/27
>
> We need people to test this MR some more, although it seems
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 07:52:19PM +0200, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> We had a Python Team BoF at DC22 earlier today and I thought relaying the
> notes we took in gobby here would be a good idea.
Thanks for the notes, Louis-Philippe, and sorry I couldn't join you!
A few
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 12:41:16AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 08:30:42PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> [...]
> > > > are they all effectively Multi-Arch: no? Is this worth thinking about
> > > > in the longer term?
> > >
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
