On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:38:23AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
First, let me thank the DPL Stefano Zacchiroli for coming to UDS-M and
representing the Debian community. It was really great meeting and having a
chance to talk with him. He's encouraged me to apply for DD status and I
think I'll
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 02:42:37AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Python 2.7 is faster than 2.6 (in my limited tests from a few
percents to more than 7 times faster, the latter with a small
CPU-intensive math program), it has a few cool new toys, for many
years in the future it will be THE
Dear Jonathan,
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 10:57:01PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:34:42PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
it is fixed upstream in automake 1.11 (and in Debian), so you could
use this version; I doubt that it will allow more binNMUs, as
autoconf
Dear Richard,
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 12:33:25PM -0500, Richard Darst wrote:
Hello,
I would like to request a review of my new packages python-ctypeslib:
http://hcoop.net/~rkd/debian/python-ctypeslib_0.0.0+svn20100125-1.dsc
or via PMPT:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:15:43AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
I was under the impression that the ‘#debian-python’ channel was a
resource for use equally by anyone for discussion of maintaining Python
packages in Debian. When did it become an in-group-versus-out-group club
house, with
Dear David,
(Others: please verify that all I've said below is correct).
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:56:22PM +, David D Lowe wrote:
Epidermis is programmed in Python 2.6. I was surprised to find that
Python 2.6 is not included in Debian unstable, but only in the
experimental repositories.
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:24:05PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
To resurrect the Python Policy as a document reflecting required and
recommended Python packaging practices, we prepared a set of patches.
We started in private to provide a complete set of changes and avoid
flames as much as
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:43:59AM -0500, Richard Darst wrote:
I removed the extra non-DEP5 stuff at the top, and tried to tighten it
up to strictly match what it says. There were some quirks, such as
the required Format-Specification field not being present in any
examples... I think that
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:52:19AM -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Other than that, I don't really think there's much to add; I'm just
hoping someone else might suggest what to do about the
${python:Depends} expanding to python (= 2.6) issue; if people can
suggest a workaround, then we can upload
Dear Richard,
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:26:00AM -0500, Richard Darst wrote:
I worked with kmap last night to get my package of python-lzma (in
DPMT svn) in shape. We think it's good, and he suggested I email here
for further review and possibly sponsorship (to experimental since it
depends
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 03:22:09PM -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
With the last upload of python-central, only a few issues with
python-central remain, before python 2.6 can be uploaded to unstable,
as has been outlined by Piotr here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2009/11/msg00014.html
Hi! This is an English list, so please frame your queries in
English. But since I could translate your query, I'll try to answer
below, please translate if needed.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 05:43:09PM +0100, Frederic Baldit wrote:
je travaille sous lenny et gnome avec python 2.5.2 et IDLE, que
travel and a presentation coming up.
I have sent a patch, which should work. I've tested it in my chroot,
and it does seem to work; others can verify and let you know.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
. Many thanks!
Sounds perfect. Thanks!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Dear Piotr,
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 01:29:56AM +0100, Piotr Ozarowski wrote:
[Kumar Appaiah, 2009-11-08]
http://tiny.pl/hqwjz
After rebuilding most packages that build depend on
python-all{,-dev,-dbg}[0], I reported few more bugs. Packages that
didn't FTBFS but ship files in /usr/local
applications and
modules, and handle bug reports and troubles with a lot of time to
spare. I fear that delaying the upload to close to the freeze might
not provide sufficient time for testing.
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
mentioned above
and proceed to fix the remaining issues.
So, Debian Python, could you please upload python2.6 to unstable?
Thanks!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 09:31:30PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:01:05PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Thanks for starting the roll. Imho numpy/scipy and then any other
python- with binary modules and not absent rdepends should be indeed
rebuilt with 2.6
=547821#20
--
Kumar Appaiah
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
?) python-numpy to fix further bugs?
If my assessment is incorrect, please do point out what I have
misunderstood. Otherwise, please advise me on a suitable approach.
Thanks!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
to get around this problem, which I haven't been able to figure
out.
Thanks.
Kumar
[0]. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=543538
[1]. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=544291
--
Kumar Appaiah
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 03:00:15PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
I've looked at a few packages in the repositories for these teams, but I'm
reluctant to start making changes without making sure it's not going to
upset anybody :)
If I am the sole maintainer/uploader, feel free to make
() also seemed OK.
I guess this can be uploaded to experimental with the new Sphinx
documentation, as Piotr says.
Thanks again.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
it earlier.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a workaround. Add this to the top of the code, you
can add the following to force TeX use:
rc('text', usetex=True)
Please tell me if this helps. I shall probe further then.
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
can't really spot the change which could have
caused this. I can have a closer look later, unless someone else
comes in before me.
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
is, though it seems to work for me...
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 08:33:28AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 01:46:49PM +0200, Eike Nicklas wrote:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 12:08:46 +0200 Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
[oc-spam66, 2008-10-08 11:55]
I went back to the former python-matplotlib package (0.98.1-1
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 08:39:15AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
I was responsible for the upload of 0.98.1-1+lenny1.1 , and I'll see
what the problem is, though it seems to work for me...
Confirmed. I have no idea what causes this, but I am sure I shouldn't
be mucking around with g
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 06:18:08PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Dear Debian Python,
I just discovered (the hard way) that the recent change in Python[1] to
display sys.platform on mips, mipsel, alpha, sparc, powerpc and hppa
as linux2-mips, linux2-mips, linux2-alpha, linux2-sparc,
linux2
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] (18/09/2008):
Now, this shouldn't really happen, since g++ is supposed to be present
during the build, right? Also, note that the g++ package is being
installed on arm and ia64, but not on mips and powerpc
it if someone could please help me understand this
problem.
Thanks in advance.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
Thanks!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 10:31:16PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
Sponsored.
Thanks a lot, Christoph!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
://kumar.travisbsd.org/debpackages/harvestman_1.4.6-4.dsc
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
462, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Piotr Ozarowski ozarow at gmail.com writes:
dh_fixperms will do the job
Removed.
Hmm... I pasted one line too much - config.xml file is installed with
dh_installexamples and thus permissions are not changed, please change
them manually as you did before (I hope you're not mad at me
Piotr Ozarowski ozarow at gmail.com writes:
Looks very good to me. As I said before, I'm not a DD so I can't
sponsor it.
Debian developers, please chip in!
If you want, you can also add these 2 lines to long description:
.
Homepage: http://harvestman.freezope.org/
^- don't miss this
Piotr Ozarowski ozarow at gmail.com writes:
$ lintian --version
Lintian v1.23.22
$ lintian ../harvestman_1.4.6-3.dsc
E: harvestman source: debian-rules-missing-required-target binary-arch
I have added it.
These lines are not needed:
find ./doc |xargs chmod 644
find -name 'config.xml'
know, so that I can correct
them as necessary.
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
462, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to be converted, and it
isn't that important either. So, if someone thinks it's worthwhile,
please do an NMU.
Thank you very much!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
462, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
462, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to function with performance improvement. Do
I need to take this into account? Advice the user?
Also, I do not think it would be correct to add them as
Conflicts, as both can peacefully coexist. Comments on this?
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
462, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 02:00:40PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 07 f?vrier 2006 ? 18:31 +0530, Kumar Appaiah a ?crit :
1.The install script provided in the package adds a symbolic link to
the executable script present in
/usr/lib/python2.x/site-packages/HarvestMan
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 02:24:48PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 07 f?vrier 2006 ? 19:03 +0530, Kumar Appaiah a ?crit :
Maybe you can simply ship this symbolic link in the python-harvestman
package.
Thanks for the suggestion, but how do I do this? Do I do this from
44 matches
Mail list logo