Re: Why is isal limited to just three archs?

Hi Nilesh, so 16. 10. 2021 v 9:09 odesílatel Nilesh Patra napsal: > I see that isal package is limited to amd64, arm64 and kfreebsd-amd64. > Is there a particular reason for this? -- Is it possible to extend support > to other archs? > When I packed libisal, only "customer" was liberasurecode.

Re: Joining the Debian Python Team: @hlobit's request

Hi, sorry for waiting and welcome :) st 24. 2. 2021 v 23:39 odesílatel dev.hubert@lobit.family napsal: > Hey Debian Python Team, > here's my request to join the team on salsa, to help maintain python > packages. > > On a daily basis, I am using python-redmine package and I saw the package > is

Re: Joining DPT

Hi, sorry for waiting and welcome :) st 3. 2. 2021 v 17:55 odesílatel Henry-Nicolas Tourneur napsal: > Hello everyone, > > I would like to join DPT, I already maintain several packages under the DPT > umbrella and I would like to expand that, helping with Lollypop > maintenance (cf > the RFA

Re: Joining DPT

Hi, sorry for waiting. To join the team please follow the procedure here: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/-/blob/master/policy.rst so 6. 2. 2021 v 12:06 odesílatel Patrick Vavrina napsal: > Hello, > > I would like join your team and learn to develop applications for

Re: Request to Join DPT

Hi, sorry for waiting and welcome :) ne 21. 2. 2021 v 12:57 odesílatel Lorenz Schori napsal: > Hi, > > I am the author of Prometheus PVE Exporter[1]. I recently discovered > that there is only one somewhat exotic dependency left (proxmoxer[2]) > which needs some love before Prometheus PVE

Re: Joining DPT

Hi, sorry for waiting. sergiosacj-guest account doesn't exists in Salsa. Is sergiosacj correct? čt 25. 2. 2021 v 19:08 odesílatel Sérgio Cipriano napsal: > Hello everyone, > > I would like to remind you about my request. > If anyone could consider it, I would be grateful. > > The package I was

Re: Access request Salsa python-team unkn0wn-user

Hi, pá 19. 3. 2021 v 16:24 odesílatel Janis Gross napsal: > Hello python-team, > > I am the one of the upstream maintainers of NESi [1] and would like to join > the debian-python-team > to package the project under the umbrella of the team. > > please follow

Re: Joining DPT

Hi, út 2. 3. 2021 v 11:21 odesílatel Philippe Coval napsal: > > Dear Python team > > I'd like to join the team to work on TUF package: > welcome :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: request to join the team

Hi, út 16. 3. 2021 v 20:00 odesílatel Hanno 'Rince' Wagner napsal: > Hi, > > since I want to make more for Debian than "only" being listmaster, I > started with packaging again. I'd like to contribute by packaging some > applications and/or modules, to learn (again) how to package; my last >

Re: joining the team

Hi, st 3. 3. 2021 v 21:28 odesílatel Daniel Milde napsal: > I would like to join the Python team. > welcome :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Joining the team, ITP and RFS

Hi Juhani, pá 27. 11. 2020 v 17:55 odesílatel Juhani Numminen < juhaninummin...@gmail.com> napsal: > Hi! > > I'd like to join the Debian Python Team welcome :) > Also, I would like to ask for a new git repository for the package. > Would you mind creating one in the standard location >

Re: Joining the team

Hi nicoo, po 23. 11. 2020 v 14:15 odesílatel nicoo napsal: > First, an apology: it seems I misremembered being in the team, and > uploaded to > NEW a bunch of packages with the team in `Uploaders`. While I guess that's > technically valid (I'm fine with the Python team uploading to them), I am

Re: python-team/packages repo move request

Hi, po 26. 10. 2020 v 9:45 odesílatel Gordon Ball napsal: > 1. Archive python-team/packages/ipython > + rename to python-team/packages/ipython-OLD > 2. Rename python-team/packages/ipython4 -> python-team/packages/ipython > done. -- S pozdravem/Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Joining the DPT

Hi, pá 23. 10. 2020 v 21:03 odesílatel Baptiste Beauplat napsal: > would like to join the Debian Python Team welcome :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Joining DPT

Hi, pá 16. 10. 2020 v 20:25 odesílatel Birger Schacht napsal: > I would like to join the Debian Python Team. welcome :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Joining the team

Hi, st 30. 9. 2020 v 14:25 odesílatel Chris MacNaughton < chris.macnaugh...@canonical.com> napsal: > - I want to join the python-modules team so that I can help improve both > Debian and Ubuntu's stance with python dependencies for OpenStack! > welcome :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Transfer cherrytree from DPT to Debian group

Hi, pá 16. 10. 2020 v 17:32 odesílatel Andrius Merkys napsal: > Hello, > > Recently cherrytree [1] has been rewritten from Python to C++, thus it > no longer belongs in DPT. Could someone with adequate permissions > transfer it from DPT to generic Debian group on salsa.d.o? > done:

Re: delete new/empty octave_kernel salsa repo

Hi Joe, čt 1. 10. 2020 v 5:55 odesílatel Joe Nahmias napsal: > Would someone with owner access for the DPT group on salsa please delete > the new/blank octave_kernel repo [Project ID: 54132] it's done. -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Policy proposal: Consistent use of UNRELEASED in debian/changelog

Hi, po 28. 9. 2020 v 2:08 odesílatel Louis-Philippe Véronneau napsal: > Hi! > > I am proposing a minor addition to the DPT policy to try to make the use > of UNRELEASED in debian/changelog more consistent. The full diff can be > found here [1]. > I agree with this proposal but please change

Re: Joining the team

Hi, po 14. 9. 2020 v 8:11 odesílatel Chris MacNaughton < chris.macnaugh...@canonical.com> napsal: > Hey team, > > I'm Chris MacNaughton (icey) and I've been working on packaging for > OpenStack in Ubuntu for about six months now and would love to help > contribute upstream a bit. I'm working on

Re: PAPT: join request

Hi, pá 11. 9. 2020 v 17:25 odesílatel Fred Le Meur < frederic.le-m...@ac-versailles.fr> napsal: > Hello, > > * I want to join Debian Python Team welcome :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Merging the PAPT and the DMPT

Hi, po 21. 9. 2020 v 13:04 odesílatel Ondrej Novy napsal: > Todo: > >- send debian-devel-announce (i will) >- mass-commit vcs+maintainer change > > done. Thanks to all who helped me with these. -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: [DRAFT] DPMT and PAPT is DPT now

Hi, thanks a lot for this. Second version: --- cut --- PAPT and DPMT become DPT Historically, the Debian Python ecosystem was maintained by two separate teams: the Debian Python Applications Packaging Team (PAPT) for applications, and the Debian Python Modules Team

Re: Merging the PAPT and the DMPT

Hi, po 14. 9. 2020 v 9:59 odesílatel Ondrej Novy napsal: > I prepared scripts for: > >- cloning ACLs from modules+applications subgroups to newly created >packages subgroup >- transferring all project from modules+applications to packages >subgroup >-

Re: Merging the PAPT and the DMPT

Hi, út 15. 9. 2020 v 0:12 odesílatel Christian Kastner napsal: > Has getting rid of the subgroups entirely been considered, IOW: moving > the packages directory to python-team/? > > The only remaining subgroup seems to be "tooling", and that could live > on as a subgroup unless I'm

Re: Merging the PAPT and the DMPT

Hi, po 14. 9. 2020 v 14:39 odesílatel Dmitry Shachnev napsal: > I think it's better to update Vcs fields in all packages to point to the > new location, not one that redirects. > > Probably also update Maintainer/Uploader fields with the new team > name/email. > yep. But updating these is a

Re: Merging the PAPT and the DMPT

Hi, po 14. 9. 2020 v 14:26 odesílatel Emmanuel Arias napsal: > So, we shouldn't be worried about changing the VCS-* path during the > migration process, isn't it? > right, we should update them in d/control, but it will work with old one too, which simplifies that process. -- Best regards

[DRAFT] DPMT and PAPT is DPT now

Hi, I would like to send information to debian-devel-announce after the team merge as suggested by Christian Kastner. Draft follows. Suggestions welcome. --- Hi, for simplification we merged two subteams - Debian Python Modules Team and Python Applications Packaging Team into just one: Debian

Re: PAPT: join request

Hi, ne 6. 9. 2020 v 19:03 odesílatel Fred Le Meur < frederic.le-m...@ac-versailles.fr> napsal: > Hello, > > I would be please to join PAPT. > cool! But please follow procedure in our team policy to join the team: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/blob/master/policy.rst

Re: request to join the debian-python team

Hi, ne 6. 9. 2020 v 5:33 odesílatel Joe Nahmias napsal: > I am a retired DD that is planning to rejoin welcome to the team :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: What is the new maintainer address for Python team?

Hi Otto, sorry for the long delay. We were in the process of changing this email address. New/correct address is: Maintainer: Debian Python Team po 31. 8. 2020 v 19:19 odesílatel Otto Kekäläinen napsal: > Hello! > > I've been using the address python-apps-t...@lists.alioth.debian.net > as

Re: Merging the PAPT and the DMPT

Hi, pá 28. 8. 2020 v 15:04 odesílatel Ondrej Novy napsal: > But because it's really huge change I want ack from at least one another > admin. > ~10 days without reply, merged. Thanks for working on this! -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Merging the PAPT and the DMPT

Hi, pá 28. 8. 2020 v 15:27 odesílatel Louis-Philippe Véronneau napsal: > I think changing the path would be a good idea, as I don't see the point > between the libraries and applications divide. +1. GitLab will take care with redirects. It's a mess now :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Merging the PAPT and the DMPT

Hi, čt 27. 8. 2020 v 22:22 odesílatel Louis-Philippe Véronneau napsal: > In October 2019, following a short discussion on the ML [1], I opened a > merge request on the policy [2] for this. Most if not all issues in that > MR have since been resolved and the only blocker is getting the admins >

Re: Request to join the DPMT

Hi, ne 23. 8. 2020 v 8:24 odesílatel Antonio Valentino < antonio.valent...@tiscali.it> napsal: > Hello, > I would like to prepare and maintain the python package for resampy [1, > 2] within the Debian Python Modules Team. > welcome :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm

Hi, po 17. 8. 2020 v 21:15 odesílatel Sandro Tosi napsal: > To these days, this is still happening! can we finally get rid of > this? Piotr, it looks like you're the admin of the mailing list, can > you take care of it please? thanks! > yes, please, please, please, please. -- Best regards

Re: PAPT team access request

H čt 23. 7. 2020 v 13:24 odesílatel Aloïs Micard napsal: > I do you agree with the Python Applications Packaging Team - Policy. > welcome :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: PAPT team access request

Hi, do you agree to our policy [1]? [1] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-apps/-/blob/master/policy.rst po 20. 7. 2020 v 17:03 odesílatel Aloïs Micard napsal: > Sorry, forgot to send my login: `creekorful` > > Thanks in advance. > > -- > Aloïs Micard > > GPG: DA4A A436 9BFA

Re: joining team / salsa access

Hi, čt 16. 7. 2020 v 15:30 odesílatel Jojo napsal: > I'd like to join the debian python modules and application teams welcome :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Request to join python-team

Hi, pá 17. 7. 2020 v 4:01 odesílatel Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro < francisco.ruvi...@riseup.net> napsal: > My name is Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro, I would like to be part of the > team welcome :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Request to join python-team on salsa

Hi Shayan, po 13. 7. 2020 v 15:41 odesílatel Shayan Doust napsal: > ... I would like to join the team > welcome to the team. -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: request to join the team

Hi Sudip, ne 12. 7. 2020 v 0:31 odesílatel Sudip Mukherjee napsal: > Hi, > > I am maintaining a python package and have few in NEW also intend to > package #962239. I think its best to maintain them as part of the > team. > My salsa id is 'sudip'. > I have read the policies at > >

Re: Request to join Python Modules Team

Hi, út 14. 7. 2020 v 23:18 odesílatel Geert Stappers napsal: > And please enlighten me (and us (through the mailinglist)) > what is holding back > https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2020/07/msg00057.html huh, this is a bit rude. This is volunteering project and you are trying to give me

Re: The python command in Debian

Hi, po 13. 7. 2020 v 19:21 odesílatel Matthias Klose napsal: > On 7/13/20 6:23 PM, Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Another solution would be to simply use the update-alternatives system > > to manage /usr/bin/python. python3 would have a higher priority than > > python2. Users

Re: Is it time to remove python-numpy from testing?

Hi, čt 9. 7. 2020 v 21:25 odesílatel peter green napsal: > python-numpy* is no longer buildable in testing due to the removal of the > "cython" binary package. > The maintainer has requested removal of python-numpy from unstable but the > ftpmasters have not yet > actioned it, presumably

Re: The python command in Debian

Hi, čt 9. 7. 2020 v 15:27 odesílatel Matthias Klose napsal: > Describing here a solution which is implemented for Ubuntu focal (20.04 > LTS). A > new source package what-is-python (-perl-dont-hurt-me) ships binary > packages > python-is-python2, python-dev-is-python2, python-is-python3 and >

Re: pybuild vs os-pkg-tools [was: Maintaining all of the testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack team]

Hi, st 8. 7. 2020 v 12:14 odesílatel Thomas Goirand napsal: > There would be no point doing that, as all what pybuild would be doing > (ie: setup.py install and unit testing), I'd be overriding it. it's doing much more, but nevermind. > The other > (IMO preferred) way would be to contribute

Re: Request to join Python Modules Team

Hi, ne 5. 7. 2020 v 18:46 odesílatel Geert Stappers napsal: > Whenever things get stalled it is good to ask: > >Who is waiting on who? > We have a rule between admins we are processing join request after few days to give everyone chance to give their opinions. In this particular case it

Re: Request to join Python Modules Team

Hi, so 4. 7. 2020 v 9:17 odesílatel Sao I Kuan napsal: > Ping o/ Or am I missing any necessary information? > I'm sorry, I overlooked your request. Added to team, welcome. -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Timing of Python upstream and Debian releases

Hi, po 6. 7. 2020 v 21:04 odesílatel Matthias Klose napsal: > So what I'm proposing here is to aim to support 3.9 as early as possible > as a > supported Python3 version, starting with the 3.9 upstream release, and > fixing > stuff on the go. Then decide in November, if we can do the defaults

Re: pybuild vs os-pkg-tools [was: Maintaining all of the testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack team]

Hi, po 6. 7. 2020 v 11:09 odesílatel Thomas Goirand napsal: > This isn't about hating or loving pybuild. This is all about being able > to control how this set of packages are build globally (the whole set of > packages. so you could wrap these global things around pybuild, right? -- Best

Re: py2removal - make all leaf applications RC

Hi, ne 5. 7. 2020 v 7:38 odesílatel Sandro Tosi napsal: > I propose to raise the severity of all leaf applications in 3 days > +1 Thanks! -- S pozdravem/Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Request for joining DPMT

Hi, so 13. 6. 2020 v 12:18 odesílatel Nilesh Patra napsal: > Hi, > I'm interested in joining DPMT > welcome :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Request to join DPMT

Hi, st 24. 6. 2020 v 11:27 odesílatel Michael Hanke napsal: > Hi, > > I would like to join DPMT, welcome :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Request to join

Hi, so 27. 6. 2020 v 15:30 odesílatel Jerome Charaoui napsal: > Hello, > > I would like to request to join the Python Applications team. > welcome :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Maintaining all of the testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack team

Hi, ne 28. 6. 2020 v 16:48 odesílatel Thomas Goirand napsal: > Hi, > > Under a single Github account, the below packages are maintained: > - mock > - subunit > - testtools > - fixtures > - funcsigs (deprecated, py2 backport) > - testresources > - traceback2 > - testscenarios > - testrepository

Re: SETUPTOOLS_SCM_PRETEND_VERSION trick : how to use it in autopkgtest?

H, po 8. 6. 2020 v 17:22 odesílatel Julien Puydt napsal: > Hi, > > I know about the SETUPTOOLS_SCM_PRETEND_VERSION trick when it is used > in d/rules : > > include /usr/share/dpkg/pkg-info.mk > export SETUPTOOLS_SCM_PRETEND_VERSION=$(DEB_VERSION_UPSTREAM) > dh-python do this automatically when

Re: Access to python-team/modules (was RFS: ruamel.yaml.clib)

Hi, ne 7. 6. 2020 v 11:26 odesílatel Michael R. Crusoe napsal: > Pardon me, I left out a component of my application for team membership: > > I have read > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/blob/master/policy.rst > and I accept the policy. > > On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at

Re: Please transfer package presto from DPMT to med-team

Hi, pá 29. 5. 2020 v 14:09 odesílatel Andreas Tille napsal: > we would like to maintain presto in Debian Med. Unfortunately I do not > have permissions to transfer the repository. Please either give me > permissions or some kind soul could do the transfer to move the repository > smoothly. >

Re: Bug#952130: Bug#937769: getting python-linecache2/python-traceback2 fixes into testing (FAO traceback2, funcsigs nipype and numba maintainers).

Hi, út 21. 4. 2020 v 23:24 odesílatel Thomas Goirand napsal: > > But that still leaves the question of what to do about the dependency of > > pytest on pypy-funcsigs ? should pypy modules be removed from pytest and > > it's reverse-dependencies in the same way that regular python2 modules > >

Re: request to join the team, again

Hi, done, welcome :) ne 29. 3. 2020 v 6:08 odesílatel Antoine Beaupré napsal: > Same, with PAPT, please. > > Thanks. > > A. > > On 2017-12-30 09:46:28, Antoine Beaupre wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been packaging stuff in Debian for a while and I'm often packaging > > dependencies that would

Re: Joining the PAPT team

Hi, po 9. 3. 2020 v 18:19 odesílatel Berthold Gehrke napsal: > Hello dear PAPT, > > I would like to join this team to maintain (for now together with a > sposor) 'my' package asciidoc3 see https://asciidoc3.org. > welcome :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: non-python packages in PAPT?

Hi, so 15. 2. 2020 v 22:17 odesílatel Philipp Huebner napsal: > Is it okay to also transfer that non-python package into PAPT? > my two cents: It's not. Why not use "debian" group for this? -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Request to join PAPT

Hi, st 5. 2. 2020 v 1:07 odesílatel Bastian Germann napsal: > ... and would like to join PAPT > welcome :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: I'd like to Join the DPMT

Hi, út 11. 2. 2020 v 14:52 odesílatel Sam Hartman napsal: > > Hi. > I've read the DPMT policy and accept it. > welcome :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: How to find DD member to perform reviews and uploads

Hi, ne 9. 2. 2020 v 15:13 odesílatel Adam Cecile napsal: > I have a couple of package ready on Salsa but my RFS sent here remained > unanswered. > best way how to get help is to join IRC and add that packages to channel topic. Thanks for your work for Debian and DPMT team. -- Best regards

Re: Separate lib and executable packages?

Hi, so 8. 2. 2020 v 20:51 odesílatel Gordon Ball napsal: > Perhaps this is worth making an explicit recommendation for new packages > of this type, given that anything new _should_ be python3-only and we > and what about pypy- prefix? -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Separate lib and executable packages?

Hi, so 8. 2. 2020 v 4:11 odesílatel Scott Kitterman napsal: > Except: Every time we add a binary to Debian it impacts everyone. The > packages file gets bigger and so updates get slower. Although there's no > firm rule, the FTP Masters discourage addition of trivially small packages > and so

Re: Separate lib and executable packages?

Hi, it depends :). My two cents: If you are packaging application (PAPT team): * user is using it in CLI / Xorg * user don't need to know it's written in Python * Python modules are typically private, not usable by other applications/libraries -> one binary package: foo If you are packaging

Re: Bug#938819: wheel: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

Hi Dmitry, čt 30. 1. 2020 v 22:38 odesílatel Dmitry Shachnev napsal: > However upstream python-keyring has dropped Python 2 support, and I want > to upgrade to a newer release, so Python 2 support will be dropped sooner > or later. > upstream drop of Python 2 support doesn't mean you need to

Re: Joining the DPMT Team

Hi, st 4. 12. 2019 v 17:07 odesílatel Boyuan Yang napsal: > ... Can > anyone add me into the DPMT Team? My Salsa account is @byang. > done. -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Severity bump script

Hi, po 2. 12. 2019 v 20:36 odesílatel Paul Gevers napsal: > #942999 and #936537 > ah right. I think this is correct. There is nothing else "in Python 2 removal process" to do on "someone else" packages. Work needs to be done in these packages so raise severity here to unblock other bugs and

Re: Severity bump script

Hi, po 2. 12. 2019 v 20:28 odesílatel Paul Gevers napsal: > I understand the drive to push for Python 2 removal and sympathize with > it. The issue I had yesterday with the process is that "leaf" was > wrongly defined, it was looking at Depends, instead of also including > Build-Depends. >

Re: Severity bump script

Hi, čt 28. 11. 2019 v 19:07 odesílatel Sandro Tosi napsal: > this is live now, with the following header: > cool, thanks again! -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: autopkgtest-pkg-python fails if package name is python-pyMODULENAME (Was: Bug#945768: python-pypubsub: autopkgtest failure: No module named 'pypubsub')

Hi, čt 28. 11. 2019 v 17:11 odesílatel Andreas Tille napsal: > Hmmm, what are the chances to get this applied? I've added > tbh dunno :) > in Git - but this will not reall fix the test. The only solution I'd see > otherwise is to deactivate the test. > you have two options: 1. deactivate

Re: autopkgtest-pkg-python fails if package name is python-pyMODULENAME (Was: Bug#945768: python-pypubsub: autopkgtest failure: No module named 'pypubsub')

Hi, čt 28. 11. 2019 v 16:04 odesílatel Andreas Tille napsal: > Is there any trick to enable autopkgtest-pkg-python detecting the correct > module name? > no (not yet? See: https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autodep8/merge_requests/6 ) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Severity bump script

Hi, čt 28. 11. 2019 v 4:12 odesílatel Sandro Tosi napsal: > i'm not sure we can: in > https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/10/msg00096.html you say > "We need to prepare draft of RC-bumper email", is this draft ready? > ah, you are right. > add the description to the header (as

Re: Severity bump script

Hi, pá 22. 11. 2019 v 22:22 odesílatel Sandro Tosi napsal: > I've removed bugs that are marked as blocked by; we're now down to 487 > unique severity raies > cool. Checked and imho it works fine now. So I guess we can run it. Thanks. -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Severity bump script

Hi Sandro, thanks for first version. I randomly checked few lines and found this: # libufo0 is an application and has low popcon (25 < 300) severity 938743 serious # libufo-bin is an application and has low popcon (4 < 300) severity 938743 serious # libufo-dev is an application and has low

Re: getmail: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

Hi, út 12. 11. 2019 v 16:37 odesílatel Osamu Aoki napsal: > Upstream is active and prides to keep python 2.5 compatibility code in > it ... (Not just 2.7). I (Osamu Aoki ) and dkg even > made some effort to support both 2 and 3 but the idea was rejected by > upstream in 2018. that's odd :/

Re: Python 2 removal in sid/bullseye: Progress and next steps

Hi, po 11. 11. 2019 v 12:07 odesílatel Yves-Alexis Perez napsal: > generic question about the interaction between the python transition and > current situation with NEW processing. > I think it's unrelated. State of NEW processing is stable for long time. But if you need to accept NEW

Severity bump script

Hi Sandro, -- Forwarded message - > We are going to raise the severity of the py2removal bugs to "serious" in several steps. In the > first phase we are going to raise severity of the py2removal bugs for > all leaf module packages and low popcon (< 300) application packages. >

Re: python-urllib3 1.25.6 uploaded to experimental (closes CVE-2019-11236) but fails build tests

Hi, út 29. 10. 2019 v 13:29 odesílatel Michael Kesper napsal: > > I see. Still an odd kind of protection though. The attacker can just > downgrade themselves. > > No. A sensible server will not talk to you if your requested SSL version > is too low. > pub.orcid.org seems to use absolutely

Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal

Hi, po 28. 10. 2019 v 10:56 odesílatel Simon McVittie napsal: > The maintainer of a leaf package can do this in a few minutes at any > time, but library packages with many reverse-dependencies (for example > dbus-python) don't really have that option, so I hope using autorm for > library

Re: Request to join DPMT

Hi, so 26. 10. 2019 v 21:33 odesílatel Jeremy Bicha napsal: > Please add me to https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules > done, welcome. :) > I expect to help out a bit with the Python2 removals thanks a lot! -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal

Hi, pá 25. 10. 2019 v 9:09 odesílatel Rebecca N. Palmer napsal: > Not the whole source package, but we do want to remove the py2 binary. > Maybe there should be two versions of the email, with the one for py2/3 > packages saying 'NMU' instead of 'removal'? > this is not how autorm works. You

Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal

Hi, pá 25. 10. 2019 v 3:30 odesílatel Sandro Tosi napsal: > do we really want to remove from testing (and subsequently from > debian, as mentioned below) if it both has a py2 and a py3k package? > should we limit this to py2-ONLY packages? > yes and no. If maintainer wants to keep package in

Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal

Hi, notes from this meeting ( https://gobby.debian.org/export/Teams/Python/Py2Removal): We want to bump all bugs to RC bugs, if they are: * leaf package * with py2 binary * bug is not marked as py2keep * all modules and low popcon apps (< 300) If package will be removed from testing (auto-rm),

Re: [Request]

Hi, út 22. 10. 2019 v 14:26 odesílatel MARIE Alexandre < alexandre.ma...@synchrotron-soleil.fr> napsal: > I woud like to join debian-python team in order to maintain and package a > bunch of modules : > welcome :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Request to Join PAPT

Hi, st 9. 10. 2019 v 19:07 odesílatel Gabe Livengood napsal: > I am interested in joining the PAPT team. welcome :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Joining DPMT

Hi, pá 18. 10. 2019 v 23:30 odesílatel Fabrice Bauzac-Stehly napsal: > May I join the DPMT, pretty please? > welcome :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Request join to PAPT

Hi, čt 17. 10. 2019 v 4:36 odesílatel Emmanuel Arias napsal: > I would like join to PAPT. welcome :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Request to join PAPT

Hi, čt 17. 10. 2019 v 15:23 odesílatel Dr. Tobias Quathamer napsal: > I'd like join PAPT. welcome :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Joining the Debian Python Modules Team

Hi, po 21. 10. 2019 v 20:40 odesílatel Adam Cecile napsal: > I would like to join Debian-Python modules team welcome :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: [Python-apps-team] pylint3 reverse dependencies.

Hi, čt 17. 10. 2019 v 14:46 odesílatel Emmanuel Arias napsal: > A team Upload is accepted, isn't? :-) > dh-python package is not team maintained. -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Raising severity to serious for some Python 2 leaf packages with no Python 3 support upstream

Hi, po 14. 10. 2019 v 4:52 odesílatel Thomas Goirand napsal: > But in both cases, it's going to take a very long time. Do we really > want to get stuck on these packages for like forever, or would it feel > ok to raise the severity to serious, so that the package gets > auto-removed and then we

Re: request to join DPMT

Hi, st 18. 9. 2019 v 12:30 odesílatel napsal: > I'd like to join the DPMT! > welcome :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: Bug#940811: ITP: python-simplenote -- Python3 API wrapper for the Simplenote web service

Hi, so 21. 9. 2019 v 8:32 odesílatel Geert Stappers napsal: > i'm not sure if the 3 should/must goto into package name. > src: python-foo binary-python3: python3-foo binary-doc: python-foo-doc Thanks. :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Re: What is the process to update the DPMT and PAPT policies?

Hi, po 16. 9. 2019 v 9:55 odesílatel Mattia Rizzolo napsal: > I wonder, I think the historical reasons for papt and dpmt to be separated > don't quite stand anymore. Perhaps the only difference left is the actual > technical difference between an application and a module as described in > the

Re: What is the process to update the DPMT and PAPT policies?

Hi, po 16. 9. 2019 v 1:59 odesílatel Louis-Philippe Véronneau napsal: > What is the process to update the DPMT and PAPT policies? we don't have process/policy to update policy. So I will propose one and let's add this process to policy itself: - anyone can submit merge request - with

  1   2   3   >