On Fri, 2023-07-28 at 12:14 +, Christian Buhtz wrote:
> I realized that most of the tests in my test suite are integration or
> system tests which are impossible to handle by Debians build server and
> testing system (how do you name it?).
These sorts of tests are suitable for autopkgtests
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 12:14:33PM +, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm upstream maintainer (but not founder) of "backintime".
>
> I realized that most of the tests in my test suite are integration or system
> tests which are impossible to handle by Debians build server and testing
>
Hello Timo,
thanks for reply.
Am 28.07.2023 14:56 schrieb Timo Röhling:
I had a look at the backintime sources, and I noticed that you
First of all: I haven't nothing. :D I'm not the founder of backintime
(BIT) just the 3rd generation maintainer trying to modernize an over 15
year old
Hi Christian,
* c.bu...@posteo.jp [2023-07-28 12:14]:
Or any other idea on your site?
I had a look at the backintime sources, and I noticed that you have
implemented a very unusual (for Python, at least) build system.
There are well-known tools and standard practices in the Python
ecosystem
Hello,
I'm upstream maintainer (but not founder) of "backintime".
I realized that most of the tests in my test suite are integration or
system tests which are impossible to handle by Debians build server and
testing system (how do you name it?).
My package do use something like "./configure
5 matches
Mail list logo
