On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:17 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> everyone read the documentation.
Ok, so when they load the documentation, their web browser will call
out to the Internet.
> on unstable, the embedded youtube stuff was detected.
Ah, good. I must have overlooked that.
> Out of
Hello Paul, thanks for your reply.
On 26/09/16 06:22, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
>> I put them a few hours ago at the Debian Sage Tean [1] repository at Aliot
>> [2].
>
> Looks like these are not false positives and are definitely privacy
>
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> I put them a few hours ago at the Debian Sage Tean [1] repository at Aliot
> [2].
Looks like these are not false positives and are definitely privacy
breaches (probably minor since I'm not sure anyone would read the
docs) and there is one
On 26/09/16 05:37, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
>> Now, I am not so sure: in case it is a false positive
>
> Can you upload source and binary packages somewhere so we can
> determine the right answer?
I put them a few hours ago at the Debian Sage
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Now, I am not so sure: in case it is a false positive
Can you upload source and binary packages somewhere so we can
determine the right answer?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On 26/09/16 04:47, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
>
> On 26/09/16 04:05, Paul Wise wrote:
>> Any particular reason you moved this thread off-list?
>
> mistake
>
>>
>> On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 03:43 +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>>
>>> I am dealing with the nbsphinx package [0,1].
>>>
>>> The patch
On 26/09/16 04:05, Paul Wise wrote:
> Any particular reason you moved this thread off-list?
mistake
>
> On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 03:43 +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
>> I am dealing with the nbsphinx package [0,1].
>>
>> The patch d/p/debianization-neutralize-lintian-privacy-breach-logo.patch in
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: Jupyter Notebook: how to comment out code in ipynb files ?
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 03:43:28 +0100
From: Jerome BENOIT <sphericaltrian...@rezozer.net>
Reply-To: sphericaltrian...@rezozer.net
Organisation: Round Sphere
To: Paul Wise <p...@d
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Some code in an ipynb document have to be discarded because
> it causes a privacy-breach-logo lintian error. Bring the involved
> icon in the debian folder makes no senses because the code is meant
> to be a URL example. Currently, I
Hello Forum,
Some code in an ipynb document have to be discarded because
it causes a privacy-breach-logo lintian error. Bring the involved
icon in the debian folder makes no senses because the code is meant
to be a URL example. Currently, I literally discard the involved code,
neverthless I would
10 matches
Mail list logo
