Re: pyyaml 6

2022-11-12 Thread Scott Kitterman
o omissions from the list though. > >>> > >>> There is a significantly longer list of packages which appear to contain > >>> a use of yaml.load _somewhere_, but it is usually in some > >>> maintainer/release script, or an optional path somewhere, and th

Re: pyyaml 6

2022-11-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
t;> a use of yaml.load _somewhere_, but it is usually in some >>> maintainer/release script, or an optional path somewhere, and the >>> package itself doesn't [build-]depend on python3-yaml. >>> >> >> I've filed bugs for (most) of the packages

Re: pyyaml 6

2022-11-02 Thread Gordon Ball
propose to wait ~2 weeks until the beginning of November and upload pyyaml 6 to unstable then. pyyaml 6 has now landed in unstable. About half the bugs I filed have been resolved, and there is only one package (ganeti) with autopkgtests blocking migration.

Re: pyyaml 6

2022-10-19 Thread Gordon Ball
the beginning of November and upload pyyaml 6 to unstable then.

Re: pyyaml 6

2022-10-10 Thread Louis-Philippe Véronneau
On 2022-10-06 21 h 43, Paul Wise wrote: On Fri, 2022-10-07 at 00:10 +0200, Gordon Ball wrote: * Upload to unstable and see what breaks? The experimental pseudo-excuses already say several packages break: https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?experimental=1=pyyaml autopkgtest for

Re: pyyaml 6

2022-10-09 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2022-10-09 21:39:56 +0200 (+0200), Gordon Ball wrote: [...] > gnocchi # confirm, in gnocchi/gendoc Looks like it was fixed in gnocchi 4.4.2 earlier this year (unstable still has 4.4.0). > jeepyb # confirm, in cmd/notify_impact I'm honestly surprised this is packaged for Debian, since it's

Re: pyyaml 6

2022-10-09 Thread Gordon Ball
On 07/10/2022 01:13, Timo Röhling wrote: > Hi Gordon, > > * Gordon Ball [2022-10-07 00:10]: >> * Upload to unstable and see what breaks? >> * Request an archive rebuild with this version and see what breaks? >> * File bugs against all likely affected packages with a fixed date for >> an upload?

Re: pyyaml 6

2022-10-07 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2022-10-07 00:10:21 +0200 (+0200), Gordon Ball wrote: [...] > The only bug requesting it actually be upgraded is > https://bugs.debian.org/1008262 (for openstack). I don't know if > that has proved a hard blocker - I _think_ anything designed to > work with 6.x should also work with 5.4. I

Re: pyyaml 6

2022-10-06 Thread Paul Wise
worth filing a transition bug. Probably also a good idea to do that anyway too. https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions There might also be Debian services broken by pyyaml 6, but they can be dealt with during the upgrade of the debian.org machines to bookworm. -- bye,

Re: pyyaml 6

2022-10-06 Thread Timo Röhling
Hi Gordon, * Gordon Ball [2022-10-07 00:10]: * Upload to unstable and see what breaks? * Request an archive rebuild with this version and see what breaks? * File bugs against all likely affected packages with a fixed date for an upload? * Wait until after the freeze? Considering that PyYAML

pyyaml 6

2022-10-06 Thread Gordon Ball
pyyaml (aka python3-yaml) is an rdepend for >300 packages. We currently have 5.4.1, but version 6 was released late last year, which does quite a lot of cleanup (eg, dropping python 2 support) and disables unsafe loading (arbitrary python code execution) unless explicitly opted into.