Le Sat, Nov 06, 1999 at 04:04:07PM +0100, Josip Rodin écrivait:
Vincent is not moderator of debian-qa-private and as such not yet
~
ITYM subscriber? Or is this a read-only list for some, and read-write for
the committee members?
Yes debian-qa-private is a public list
Le Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 01:24:35PM +0200, Mikael Andersson écrivait:
I have tried to get in contact with Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] since
mid of Jun, but still no success. I have asked on debian-private, but no
one else have told me that the have succeded in contacting him.
Looking at
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009, Chris Taylor wrote:
This patch fixes the removal bug in sqlrelay. It simply removes all
sqlrelay files and the directory from /etc.
-Chris
--- a/debian/sqlrelay.postrm
+++ b/debian/sqlrelay.postrm
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ set -e
case $1 in
remove|purge)
[ Same message sent in bcc to all remaining FTBFS with new source format ]
Hello,
the new source format 3.0 (quilt) is now allowed in testing/unstable and
having all packages buildable with the new format is a release goal
(http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/NewDebFormats).
Thus it would be
Hi Ignace,
if you mail only 553...@bugs.debian.org the original bug submitter won't
get a copy and you won't get an answer. Use
553314-submit...@bugs.debian.org or directly use group reply in the
archive mbox that you can download on the web.
Cheers,
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, Ignace Mouzannar wrote:
severity 571982 important
thanks
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010, Lucas wrote:
Package: alltray
Version: 0.70-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
alltray iceowl --st --na causes Iceowl to start, but no icon
actually appears in the system tray and there's no way to get the
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
I agree that given that Ubuntu has made this rather poor decision, we're only
left with this inelegant way forward to unify the packages again. Obviously
we
cannot have this changed for Squeeze anymore, so it'll have to be postponed
for a bit.
-dev_1.14.20_all.deb
--
Raphael Hertzog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/2008/04/msg4.html
[2] the upcoming dpkg-dev 1.14.20 is more tolerant with patches, you can
grab it here if you want to try with that version:
http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/packages/dpkg-dev_1.14.20_all.deb
--
Raphael Hertzog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
if you want to try with that version:
http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/packages/dpkg-dev_1.14.20_all.deb
--
Raphael Hertzog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/04/msg4.html
[2] the upcoming dpkg-dev 1.14.20 is more tolerant with patches, you can
grab it here if you want to try with that version:
http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/packages/dpkg-dev_1.14.20_all.deb
--
Raphael Hertzog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
://people.debian.org/~hertzog/packages/dpkg-dev_1.14.20_all.deb
--
Raphael Hertzog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
I figured this out too late, but it seems that all those bugs are caused
by a dpkg-dev regression.
Bug#486987: sugar-toolkit: FTBFS: new copyright notices
Bug#486979: sugar-datastore: FTBFS: new copyright notices
Bug#486975:
Le mercredi 26 janvier 2005 à 18:51 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar a
écrit :
Hi Raphael,
I'd like to have support for removal requests in the PTS. I think I can
technically add that myself, but won't do it without your permission, of
course.
Hi Jeroen,
I'd be happy if you provide me a
Le mardi 26 avril 2005 à 21:36 +0200, Filippo Giunchedi a écrit :
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote on 26-04-2005 11:55:
I'm willing to fix this sometime if someone can point me to the sources
of the PTS.
check http://cvs.debian.org/pts/?cvsroot=qa
having MMDDhhmm as the filename for the news
Hi,
i've just written a little perl script which generates a list of packages
ordered by the number of bugs !
This list could be used by new developers (like me) to find out a package
they could help by correcting bugs/by adopting it/etc.
You can find this list here (it's automatically updated
Le Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 08:05:41PM +0200, Josip Rodin écrivait:
You are completely missing the point. It is not written anywhere that
QA Group members MUST do anything after the specified periods, but that
they MAY do something after the specified period of time. Today, they
actually can't do
Le Sat, Apr 24, 1999 at 12:04:50AM +0200, Josip Rodin écrivait:
Is this written clear enough now? We obviously need a native English
speaker to read the text and find any wrong/awkward/unusual expressions/words.
It's fine for me but ...
I'm not really sure... people can get in situations
Le Mon, Jul 05, 1999 at 10:28:48PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff écrivait:
Who is maintaining dinstall? It's just crazy that it does not notice this
package being maintained by the QA team - I think it should close bugs of
packages maintained by debian-qa.
It's one of the ftpmasters, Guy Maor.
Le Mon, Jul 05, 1999 at 07:12:52PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait:
The libmd5-perl package should be removed from potato. It has been
totally superseded by libdigest-md5-perl, which represents a
significant upgrade upstream.
The people who have packages which depend on libmd5-perl must be
Le Mon, Jul 05, 1999 at 07:12:52PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait:
The libmd5-perl package should be removed from potato. It has been
totally superseded by libdigest-md5-perl, which represents a
significant upgrade upstream.
libapache-asp-perl has been corrected. You (the ftpmaster) will
Le Sat, Jul 10, 1999 at 04:58:10PM -0700, michael écrivait:
Hello,
I saw that electric-fence is on the list of orphaned packages, and I would
be interested in volunteering to be it's maintainer.
Instead of sending your request to wnpp, you could have looked in the
Packages.gz file and you
[ Large crosspost to start the discussion, please reply to debian-devel
only. Simply respect the reply-to. ]
Hello everybody,
you may or not be aware that getting a Debian developer is quite long. I
want to propose a solution to facilitate the integration of new
Debian developers.
It's quite
Le Fri, Aug 27, 1999 at 04:40:41PM -0400, Michael Stone écrivait:
I'm a little concerned about creating the link in the postinst, as that
part of the install (IIRC) can be delayed for various reasons. (And it
would be a Bad Thing to risk losing /bin/sh for an indefinite period of
time.) Can
Hi,
I didn't want to announce this today but since Joey has brought up
a hot topic on -devel this morning, I feel that it's time
to make public what some people (me, Christian Kurz, Tortsten Landschoff,
Josip Rodin, Vincent Renardias and Martin Joey Schulze) have
prepared for resurrecting
Le Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 04:30:45PM +, David Coe écrivait:
Let's do it. How can I help? I agree we shouldn't have to vote on this;
Actually what I need is a much better main page for the QA web site :
http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~raphael/qa/
I need a text explaining how people can work for
Le Sat, Sep 18, 1999 at 01:25:06AM -0400, Johnie Ingram écrivait:
Well I don't know if those internal problems/suggestion does interest
people on debian-qa ... but since you posted there ...
* For qa-bot: for consistency a single-word command should be provided
for everything, e.g helpme
Le Sat, Sep 18, 1999 at 06:30:13AM -0400, Johnie Ingram écrivait:
Raphael Is a package name enough for the Prospectives Packages ?
Yes, the rest can be determined with scripts.
Huh ? I thought about prospectives packages, ie software that is not yet
packaged for Debian ... I suppose that you
Le Sat, Sep 18, 1999 at 10:33:29AM -0400, Johnie Ingram écrivait:
That could be done, but I like to keep separate the cases where the
maintainer still cares slightly -- otherwise it would be unclear how
much can be asked of the person in the control file. This is
something like a reluctantly
Le Sat, Sep 18, 1999 at 04:35:43PM +0200, Josip Rodin écrivait:
Should I ask for the creation of such a mailing list ? Once it is created
I can easily add the list in the different aliases ...
Yes, several of them should be created, depending on what people need.
I think all mails (or
Le Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 04:46:25AM +, Yves Arrouye écrivait:
Now, what is funny is that I was a member of Debian until 1997, when I
left France. If you look at the list of packages that are orphaned and
that Debian QA wants an owner for, there are two I authored, and would
get back
Le Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 04:57:14PM -0400, Raul Miller écrivait:
Anyone know how to find these bugs? bugs.debian.org/9wm gives
me a 404. Usually that means no bugs against the package..
Not it's a bug in the URL redirector written for bugs.debian.org, the
problem is that the first char is a
Le Mon, Oct 11, 1999 at 10:39:58AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff écrivait:
I do not speak french also. Perhaps Raphael could help?
What should I precisely do to help ?
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog 0C4CABF1 http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~raphael/
pub CD Debian :
Le Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 12:50:48AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff écrivait:
We need to evaluate the license of ocamltk (right?). The english translation
seems to be non-free but perhaps the translation if wrong.
Where (precisely) can I find this license ? I rapidly looked at
www.inria.fr and didn't
[ Followup in debian-devel, please respect it ]
Hi people,
i've adopted gnome-core some weeks ago, i've cleaned and checked
most of the bugs with the help of Christian Marillat.
But it's a big package (in fact many little packages) and you always
get new bug reports. I'd like that my
Le Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 09:38:01AM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer écrivait:
Well, perl-base seems to work, can anyone remind areas where it *may*
fail so I can test?
A script with use POSIX will fail.
data-dumper is apparently missing from your base (it should not). The
bug seems to be on
Le Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 12:55:46PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer écrivait:
A script with use POSIX will fail.
OK, it means POSIX is not in perl-base.
No, POSIX is in perl-5.005-base. But some files (autosplit.ix at least)
are missing.
* Is it a problem? For who?
POSIX is needed for the i18n
Le Sat, Jan 15, 2000 at 04:25:35PM +0100, Thierry Laronde écrivait:
Package: cgi-scripts
Severity: critical
This orphaned package is, at the moment, inconsistent, lacking documentation,
giving scripts that are now almost useless, and placing in /cgi-bin/ Bourne
Shell scripts invoking
Le Sun, Jan 23, 2000 at 02:13:38PM +0100, Thierry Laronde écrivait:
I have made a suggestion for this (Cf dpkg | dselect| apt : Debian-qa
fields planned ? thread).
Without going thus far, an admin could/should check if he wants to keep
packages that are not provided by the selected set of apt
Le Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 06:58:55PM +0100, Gabriele Kayser écrivait:
Hallo Remco,
Hi,
No, the problem is not solved, because this packages ar named
perl an *NOT* perl5. If I try to install package
sysutils_1.3.6.1.deb I get Dependency-Problem-Message, because on
my system is no
Le Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 06:13:15PM +0100, Thierry Laronde écrivait:
I have sent some control bugs messages, to close 3 bugs, and to reassign one
(the one attached). I have put, as comments, the explanations about the
decisions taken.
I thought that these mails will be put verbatim in the
Le Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 08:07:37PM +0100, Thierry Laronde écrivait:
Hello,
Hi,
I have made a bit of cleaning in the BTS about the bugs open against
util-linux.
With Vincent benediction ? Anyway if what you did is right then nobody
will complain. :)
The problem is that 15 (25%) bugs are
Le Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 01:01:01AM +0100, Martin Schulze écrivait:
. Are all dependencies and recommends fulfilled within every
respective priority fulfilled?
There are many many problems for packages within optional extra
priorities but for standard higher, there isn't as much.
Some
Le Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 04:52:14PM +0100, Josip Rodin écrivait:
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 04:09:11PM +0100, Eric Delaunay wrote:
but it is not declared orphaned (could be a bug in Debian web pages).
Yes, a bug in the BTS.
No, it's a bug in the override file. Dear ftpmaster, could you remove
Hello dear people,
could someone with a good knowledge of perl have a look at this problem ?
That's the kind of work we (as the QA group, however debian-perl is cced
since we may find perl guru over there) should be able to do... help
maintainers when they requested it.
Florian, did you try to
[ Follow up on debian-qa ]
Hi dear developers,
Lalo Martins decided to leave the project and as such, his packages
must be adopted by valuable maintainers (who can afford the time to
fix the backlog of bugs).
3 sources packages are concerned :
- dcd (a command line CD player)
- lletters (GTK
Le Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 05:23:01PM -0500, Steve Gore écrivait:
not for long..) If Tony is willing to sponsor me on this, I'll take it.
Sorry, but Jules Bean is taking it over. Lalo already had taken care of
the future maintainers ...
BTW, aren't the freeciv-gtk and freeciv-xaw3d packages
Le Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 09:44:37PM +0100, M.C. Vernon écrivait:
I was looking at our bug list, and came across this one, which is a
reference to a patch to make libregex0 work with emacs18. Given we don't
ship emacs18, shall I close this bug?
You're a QA member, it's up to you to decide. :)
Le Wed, May 17, 2000 at 09:19:52AM +0400, Michael Sobolev écrivait:
Today I decided to upgrade cucipop package and found the same message I
reported in bug #51359. I even provided the fix, but since then it was
not fixed. What can be done in this case?
Fix it yourself upload the fixed
Le Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 09:59:23AM +0800, Peter Crystal écrivait:
Erm? 'We' ?
Yeah, those that try to make Debian evolve ... :)
Actually, I support Nils, we really need to put something up
for the Project Page. Nils me took a look at SourceForge last sunday
and it offers most of what we
Le Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 06:07:29PM +, Luis Arocha -data- écrivait:
I haven't received any feedback to my last posts to debian-qa. Is anybody
interested in the correct closing classification of bugs? Is anybody
interested in the Bug Revision System or am I losing my time?
No, you're not
Le Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 12:29:44PM +, Mark Brown écrivait:
Of course, if the BTS could be available through a SQL (or LDAP? Ben ?)
server, it would even be better/simpler for you ...
The BTS is avaliable through LDAP - see reportbug for an example of
using it like that.
I know I heard
Le Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 08:06:14PM +0100, Christian Kurz écrivait:
On 01-02-01 Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
up the release process? The answer is at least partially evident: we
need people actually doing QA. It looks like Raphael, whom, AFAIK, was
playing QA coodinator, got caught up in
Le Thu, May 10, 2001 at 06:46:02PM +0200, Adrian Bunk écrivait:
The only problem with roxen2 seems to be that it's being held up by pike7
that waits for imlib (or it will become uninstallable on alpha) that waits
for libpng (or it will become uninstallable on powerpc) that is only 6/10
days
Le Wed, May 16, 2001 at 08:48:14AM +0200, Martin Quinson écrivait:
I think we could make a dh_fhs, which insert the code fragment given in the
policy in the files, and move anything still in /usr/doc or /usr/man to
/usr/share.
Why ? debhelper does already do all this stuff.
What do you think
Le Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:53:17AM +0200, Adrian Bunk écrivait:
Sorry, but these are serious bugs. We want to have /usr/doc symlinks for
_all_ our packages in woody.
Why ? What does it gain us ?
I'm against submitting more more RC bugs that are not worth it
considering that we don't have the
Le Fri, May 18, 2001 at 01:30:47PM +0200, Josip Rodin écrivait:
The Maintainer: field of the gtoaster package is broken.
Yup it lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I still don't really understand why we did that change. Either you're
working on -qa and you're interested in what
Le Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 07:25:30AM -0400, Paul Wright écrivait:
I don't think you understand what Debian-QA is actually doing. If you
would pay closer attention to the debian-qa list, you would discover that
[...]
I don't understand why someone's first post to a (any) Debian mailing list
Le Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 04:29:41AM +0200, David Spreen écrivait:
well, perhaps herbert xu will listen to you, he doesn't listen to me.
That's not really a way to handle problems.
My problem is the following, I do not know why it is necessary to
modify the kernelsource from upstream so much,
Le Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 06:24:07AM -0400, Michael Stone écrivait:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 05:00:36AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Who has the authority to remove a package in this state, and forestall
angry complaints should the maintainer come back some years in the
future? Well, the
Le Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 04:49:05AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode écrivait:
Jordi Mallach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
infocom, int-fiction, jlex, libggidemos, propsel, rocks-n-diamonds,
xserver-ggi: this maintainer looks like completely MIA. I see tbm has
noticed already :
infocom was
Le Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 07:55:13AM -0400, Michael Stone écrivait:
The QA committee was designed to play such a role. Sorry.
The committee may have been designed that way, but it never had any
more authority to act than any maintainer already has. (IOW, a QA
Yes, that's true, but many
Le Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 11:19:48AM +0200, Yann Dirson écrivait:
I have packaged a new version of gcompris, fixing a RC bug for hppa.
Unfortunately, I still have a slow RTC modem line and pay for communications.
The signed source package is at http://people.debian.org/~dirson/
Could someone
Quoting Jeroen van Wolffelaar:
The latest news feature on the PTS has details as
http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/spamassassin/news/2.html etc.
However, on a new news item, all news will shift one place, and the most
recent one will be called '1.html'. This makes linking to items quite
Hello,
I gave a talk about Debian-QA last week during the Libre Software
Meeting in Dijon.
At the end we had an interesting discussion concerning the packages
which have a very small userbase and for which we have troubles to find
a maintainer : oprhaned/unmaintained packages !
I discussed this
(Resent, sorry if you get this mail twice... I sent the initial message
to a wrong email address and i've been blocked by crossasssin)
Hello,
I gave a talk about Debian-QA last week during the Libre Software
Meeting in Dijon.
At the end we had an interesting discussion concerning the packages
[ Moving the discussion to debian-qa where it belongs, setting the
reply-to accordingly ]
Le mardi 12 juillet 2005 à 11:58 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld a écrit :
I think you are mixing two things here that should not be mixed,
sponsoring non-DDs and handling orphaned packages. Either a package
has
Le mercredi 13 juillet 2005 à 17:33 -0400, Michael Stone a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 07:27:58PM +0200, Benjamin Bayart wrote:
If you think it is satisfactory, then, well, perhaps there is nothing to
change and I'm wrong on that. But if you think it have to be improved,
my proposition is
Le mercredi 13 juillet 2005 à 13:16 -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
I would be willing to maintain dvidvi, and a few similar random packages
like that that I don't use personally but that have a set of users that
want them and supply patches for them, once I get through the NM process.
While I'm
Le lundi 18 juillet 2005 à 16:36 +0200, Martin Schulze a écrit :
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
I discussed this with Benjamin Bayart who is a TeX expert and gave me
some examples concerning some small packages like dvi2dvi. He's not
willing to go through NM to become a Debian Maintainer because
Le lundi 18 juillet 2005 à 10:42 -0700, Matt Zimmerman a écrit :
I recommend linking to the index of Ubuntu patches grouped by maintainer,
now provided by Joachim Breitner.
Well the PTS is package oriented so the grouping by maintainer doesn't
make sense. It would make sense however for the
Le mardi 19 juillet 2005 à 10:34 +0200, Benjamin BAYART a écrit :
and I can't see how the proposal will add anything that
can't already be done if you have active users developers.
The main difference is between having developpers and having
Debian-developpers. When you say a package is
Le mardi 19 juillet 2005 à 11:15 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit :
Please don't do that. Ubuntu's 1.5 mb patch for base-config is
thuroughly useless (as I've mentioned before) and if the PTS starts
nagging me about it, I'll have to stop using the PTS.
Agreed, that's why it's better to simply provide
Le mardi 19 juillet 2005 à 11:46 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit :
Why are changes made by one particular derived debian distribution so
important that they should be singled out by the PTS?
Because they're doing a good job and because those changes are done by
DD ... and because the interest of both
Le mercredi 20 juillet 2005 à 09:19 -0400, Michael Stone a écrit :
efforts. And, yes, a patch in a BTS is only accessible to developpers,
not to users. Users does not know how to apply a patch and compile a
program, this is why they use a distribution.
bullshit alertSo, ordinary users can't
Le mercredi 20 juillet 2005 à 23:44 +0100, tim hall a écrit :
Last Wednesday 20 July 2005 16:10, Robert Lemmen was like:
so i'd say: a good way to notify maintainers of patches against their
packages (apart from the bts) is probably cool. making it
ubuntu-specific or (yuck!) applying these
Le mercredi 20 juillet 2005 à 17:52 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit :
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But building packages from a suvbersion repository can be done
automatically. So yes, we could provide automatically unofficial
packages to the users.
I'm fine
Le mercredi 20 juillet 2005 à 19:52 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt a
écrit :
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But building packages from a suvbersion repository can be done
automatically. So yes, we could provide automatically unofficial
packages to the users. And furthermore
Le jeudi 21 juillet 2005 à 08:41 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
I'm fine with that, but I'm against making them official packages.
That's not your call. The DD who checks the package decides if he wants
to upload it or not.
What's the difference between your proposal and :
- Some
Hi Marc,
Le lundi 12 septembre 2005 à 01:06 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt a
écrit :
Heya,
Frank and I checked a bunch of very old packages and filed some bugs
about them - I just added usertags for my bugs to make tracking
easier. Bugs that propose to remove the package and give the
[ Sorry for the crosspost, but the subject is of interest to many people ]
Hello everybody,
following the last discussion at the Debian-QA meeting on Darmstadt, it
appears that the proposal called Collaborative maintenance is of generic
interest :
- for Debian sponsors and Debian mentors
- for
Hello Daniel,
Le lundi 19 décembre 2005 à 08:24 +0100, Daniel Holbach a écrit :
- team maintenance with SVN is more and more popular, and a good web
interface above a SVN repo of Debian packages would help all those
teams
I'd be in favour or a bzr solution, not because of random
Le lundi 19 décembre 2005 à 11:04 +0100, Christoph Haas a écrit :
This infrastructure is seriously needed in Debian because:
- team maintenance with SVN is more and more popular, and a good web
interface above a SVN repo of Debian packages would help all those
teams
If there is a
Hi Stefan,
On Wed, 04 Jan 2006, Stefan Potyra wrote:
I'll just try to restart the discussion with a proposal:
Currently I maintain one package (min12xxw, see [1]) for ubuntu, have filed
an
ITP (#334093) in debian but haven't tried hard enough to find a sponsor yet.
Since this package is
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Justin Pryzby wrote:
Is Christian Bayle [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIA?
No, he isn't. I discuss with him regularly.
Can we remove crystalspace?
I'll leave that up to him to reply. :-)
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux :
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
I'm all for a CSS based layout. For automated use of the data, however,
wouldn't it make sense to provide some kind of interface that is
suitable for automated use? XML-RPC, or whatever, I'm not familiar with
the technologies in question.
An
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
I suppose frankie was speaking about something like a SOAP interface or
alike,
in order to be able to query the PTS remotely, within a script.
Personally I think SOAP is overrated, overhyped, or both. But as the PTS
uses XML to store its
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Erm, I didn't want to do that, because it'll open up base/ for everyone
to crawl, including spambots. And all the mails are there without any
headers removed, including internal PTS addresses that should not be
exposed, to avoid spam causing
The PTS should download a list of pseudopackages so that it avoids giving
the current warning. The list is available via rsync:
buxy Heya, could you guys please export the etc/pseudo-packages.* files via
HTTP so that the PTS can always grab the reference version of those files ?
dondelelcaro
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Matej Vela wrote:
retitle 275774 RM: oonsoo -- RoQA; orphaned for 500+ days, many alternatives
reassign 275774 ftp.debian.org
block 202764 by 275774
block 356098 by 275774
Is this a new policy to block (RC) bug by the request of removal bug ?
I find this rather strange
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Matej Vela wrote:
It's just something I've started doing to make these bugs easier to
ignore on http://bugs.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED].
I find this rather strange ... why not simply CC the bug greports so
that anyone trying to fix it will discover that the package is
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
I've just ran it, and with the exception of lpr, there were no problems.
lpr does cause a problem, but it seems to be because the chroot does not
contain /proc and the preinst that runs on upgrade calls
start-stop-daemon, which fails due to the lack
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 09:35:51AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 01:27:59PM +0100, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote:
This package is no longer part of any Debian distribution. Thus you
won't find much information here. The
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
I don't see your point right now. The PTS page is only created once the
package is in unstable. At that point, you can't have the removed page.
No, the page is also created when there is news, but no unstable package
*yet*. So it's either
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, MJ Ray wrote:
I probably need to understand how mail gets into the system
better before I can see how to prepare the bounce handler.
That's easy to check. Login in master and check
/org/packages.qa.debian.org/mail/.
I don't understand how that could do per-user
Hi,
everybody in Debian likes to have news from the various groups doing
interesting Debian work and I think that we should aim to get regular
Bits from the QA team (or similar) posted to d-d-a.
I suggest to use a wiki page to collect items that are interesting for
such a report. Please check
On Sat, 03 Jun 2006, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
Package: packages.qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Please include the packages description on packages.qa.debian.org.
Why?
IMO it's not necessary:
1/ The packages.debian.org link in the title will in 2 clicks bring you to
the description of the
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
The qa page links to section 7.4 in the developers' reference which says
that there is a tool mia-history to query the MIA database. First of
all, I would have expected that this is in the path, and I would
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
The experimental Buildd Logs link does not only list experimental
package versions but also non-release archs, thus confusing people
into thinking there is nothing interesting when there are no
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, Geert Stappers wrote:
The text tells about the (upstream) source by using the generic name
package, the example tells about the Debian directory.
So fix the wording... and don't change everything when there has been some
serious discussion on -devel and when lots of
1 - 100 of 679 matches
Mail list logo
