Your message dated Sat, 16 May 2009 22:10:49 +0100
with message-id <200905162110.n4glan8w017...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line mserv has been removed from Debian, closing #289788
has caused the Debian Bug report #289788,
regarding mserv should follow symbolic links
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
289788: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=289788
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: mserv
Version: 0.35-6mod
Severity: wishlist


Hi,
   
  Currently mserv does not follow symbolic links when searching for
tracks (function 'mserv_scandir_recurse' in 'mserv/mserv.c'). This is an
actual limitation since it does not allow to sparse tracks among several
partitions. Do you or upstream intend to fix it ?

  Lionel.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7
Locale: lang=fr_fr.ut...@euro, lc_ctype=fr_fr.ut...@euro (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages mserv depends on:
ii  adduser                     3.59         Add and remove users and groups
ii  debconf                     1.4.30.11    Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  perl                        5.8.4-5      Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

-- debconf information excluded


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.35-8+rm

The mserv package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/473895 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to