Bug#837552: marked as done (sddm: Greeter segfaults on startup)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2016 18:48:12 -0700 with message-id <3fc60b5e-2dfd-ab44-37a0-e04edcfc2...@aoi.dyndns.org> and subject line Re: sddm: Greeter segfaults on startup has caused the Debian Bug report #837552, regarding sddm: Greeter segfaults on startup to be marked as done. This means

Re: gpgme 1.7.0~ alpha or beta to debian experimental?

On Sat 2016-09-10 13:00:26 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > As i understand it from a talk given by Andre Heinecke (GPGME upstream, > cc'ed here) at OpenPGP.conf, GPGME 1.7.0 is likely to take over as > upstream from pyme, gpgmepp, and qgpgme. (it will also add a > common-lisp binding, but

Processed: [bts-link] source package cantor

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package cantor > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to

Processed: [bts-link] source package plasma-workspace

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package plasma-workspace > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to

Bug#838595: okteta: installing okteta generates defunct Nepomuk

Source: okteta Version: 4:4.14.2-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? apt-get install okteta * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? apt-get install okteta * What was the outcome of this action? okteta was

Bug#838568: Wrong systray notification

Package: plasma-discover Version: 5.7.4-1 Severity: normal In systray, discover says there are 4 pack aged to update. When asking for update no packages in this state. Same with aptitude : no package is upgradable. -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers testing

Bug#838507: Removed package(s) from unstable

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: kdevelop-php |5.0.1-2 | armel kdevelop-php-docs |1.7.3-1 | armel --- Reason --- ROM; requires kdevelop (which needs llvm 3.8)

Bug#838505: Removed package(s) from unstable

Version: 1.7.3-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package kdevelop-php-docs has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see

Bug#838460: Removed package(s) from unstable

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libqt5webchannel5 |5.6.1-1 | armel libqt5webchannel5-dev |5.6.1-1 | armel qml-module-qtwebchannel |5.6.1-1 | armel qtwebchannel5-examples |5.6.1-1 | armel

Bug#838506: Removed package(s) from unstable

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: kdevelop-python |1.7.3-1 | armel --- Reason --- ROM; requires kdevelop (which needs llvm 3.8) -- Note that

Bug#838505: Removed package(s) from unstable

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: kdevelop-php-docs |1.7.3-1 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x ---

Bug#784485: marked as done ([kdevelop-php-docs] Qt4's WebKit removal)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2016 08:02:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#838505: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #784485, regarding [kdevelop-php-docs] Qt4's WebKit removal to be marked as done. This means that