give back of evolution-sharp/0.16.0-1 on amd64 and ia64

Please give back evolution-sharp/0.16.0-1 on amd64 and ia64 I uploaded evolution-sharp after uploading a new mono release, which was not that good :-P as it lets all packages fails to build till mono is built on each arch. (mono on amd64 and ia64 are built already) -- Regards, Mirco 'meebey'

/intro/organization and general Release Team vs. stable Release Team

Hi! aba made me aware of that the Release Management could go well with a link to release.debian.org so I added it. While doing so I noticed that the whole thing looks a bit chaotic: Release Managers -- ... Release Managers for ``stable'' -- ... Release Assistants -- ...

Re: [Pkg-virtualbox-devel] xerces transition

On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Meskes wrote: On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 09:45:15PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: To all maintainers of packages that have dependencies on libxerces27 or libxerces28: If you do not have a build dependency on libxerces27-dev or libxerces28-dev, then please

openssl 0.9.8c-4etch2 in proposed-updates.

Hi, I've uploaded openssl 0.9.8c-4etch2 to proposed-updates a few days ago. It contains 2 security fixes of which 1 is rather large. Could this be accepted in proposed-updates and later maybe move to a stable point release? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Re: give back of evolution-sharp/0.16.0-1 on amd64 and ia64

On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 12:26:49PM +0200, Mirco Bauer wrote: Please give back evolution-sharp/0.16.0-1 on amd64 and ia64 I uploaded evolution-sharp after uploading a new mono release, which was not that good :-P as it lets all packages fails to build till mono is built on each arch. (mono on

Bug#475088: RM: dcc/stable -- ROST; Upstream requests removal, security issues, upstream went non-free

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal When investigating a fix for CVE-2007-1047 upstream told us that the ancient version of DCC in stable causes problems for the public DCC servers. Since newer versions are non-free and have already been removed from unstable, DCC should rather be removed

[stable] FWD: [paquet wxmax ima - bug critique non résolu]

Dear maintainer and Stable release team, One user on the debian-user-french mailing list noted that the bug 432665 was rendering the package useless but is apparently not fixed in a point release of Etch. If the bug really originates from a single '' missing, is there a chance that a stable