Hi!
beep is not old enough yet (4 of 10 days) but I rather want to have
things set in time and I don't expect any further upload to come soon:
beep (1.2.2-21) unstable; urgency=low
* Don't ignore make clean errors anymore.
* New debconf translation: Galician by Jacobo Tarrio
Hi,
please schedule binNMUs for linux-modules-nonfree-2.6 in order to get it
in sync with the archive again.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[sent again, with correct list address (and friendlier subject)]
Hi,
Andreas Barth requested to keep severity of bug#457461 until either
bugreporter or someone from the release team agreed to lower it.
So, do anyone from the release team (or
hello,
thanks for the information.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:59:00AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Andreas Barth requested to keep severity of bug#457461 until either
bugreporter or someone from the release team agreed to lower it.
So, do anyone from the release team (or bugreporter)
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:44:33PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
licq in stable is currently unusable due to server-side changes (see bug
#488934). The patch is trivial and I have confirmed that it applies to
the stable version and works.
The question now is where to upload to?
Is this ok
Hi,
debian-edu-install is blocked, because it contains a udeb, which is not used
by (Debians) debian-installer (atm). Please unblock it (even though it still
has to wait 2 more days...)
Thanks,
Holger
pgpoY0rG7DsDb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi!
beep is not old enough yet (4 of 10 days) but I rather want to have
things set in time and I don't expect any further upload to come soon:
beep (1.2.2-21) unstable; urgency=low
* Don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oh, and I forgot to mention what I assumed was obvious:
* Please focus on this meta-claim of too many bugs possibly not RC
by themselves but together making yaird RC.
* Please discuss details of each issue at the bugreport filed/forked
hello,
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 01:45:23PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
* Please discuss details of each issue at the bugreport filed/forked
to track that specific issue.
your aggressive snipping makes you look better then you are,
not okay.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:41:35AM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 02:26:48PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 01:45:23PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
* Please discuss details of each issue at the bugreport
filed/forked to track that specific issue.
your
The gdal library seems needing a rebuild with current GCC, and
than mapserver and other rdependencies (I guess all those that use
its unofficial C++ API :-/ so currently just mapserver) need to be rebuilt
against it. I found that I can also re-activate optimization in mapserver,
without
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 04:15:32PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
The gdal library seems needing a rebuild with current GCC, and
than mapserver and other rdependencies (I guess all those that use
its unofficial C++ API :-/ so currently just mapserver) need to be rebuilt
against it. I
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=jppy
http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=jppy
No idea what's going on, but since it builds everywhere else, this
is likely an ia64 problem.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' : proud Debian developer, author,
Hello,
I am thing about removing ftpmirror completely from debian. Last
upstream is dated back to 2004. I don't have time and resources for
overtaking upstream work. There are some RCs filled against this package
as well. Furthermore, I have some signals that people are not really
using this
All the changes are minor. The only real code change (in po-mode.el)
is a one-liner and it's approved by upstream.
[ BTW: Thanks to whoever built it for alpha ].
gettext (0.17-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Added lpia to the list of supported mono archs. Closes: #455842.
Requested by Ubuntu,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi people.
Policy 11.8.5.1 says:
If one or more of the fonts so packaged are
necessary for proper operation of the package with which they are
associated the font
package may be Recommended; if the fonts merely provide an
enhancement, a Suggests
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 06:17:04PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=jppy
http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=jppy
No idea what's going on, but since it builds everywhere else, this
is likely an ia64 problem.
What did you do to isolate the
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Hi!
beep is not old enough yet (4 of 10 days) but I rather want to have
things set in time and I don't expect any further upload to come soon:
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 07:34:13PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 06:17:04PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=jppy
http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=jppy
No idea what's going on, but since it builds everywhere
Santiago Vila wrote:
All the changes are minor. The only real code change (in po-mode.el)
is a one-liner and it's approved by upstream.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Antonin Kral wrote:
Hello,
I am thing about removing ftpmirror completely from debian. Last
upstream is dated back to 2004. I don't have time and resources for
overtaking upstream work. There are some RCs filled against this package
as well. Furthermore, I have some signals that people are
Christoph Martin wrote:
Hi release team,
Hi Christoph
The l10n team asked for a new upload of openssl to include the pending
l10n updates. All the changes for this packages were checked in into
alioth.
Would you consider letting in a new Debian release of openssl including
the last
Hi Luk,
thanks for info. I wanted at the beginning file the bug, bug reportbug
suggested to through debian-release. I'll go through bug then.
Thank you,
Antonin
* Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-15 20:15] wrote:
Antonin Kral wrote:
Hello,
I am thing about removing
Heya World,
I just did the requested switch, sysklogd/klogd are now priority extra,
rsyslog (not its -mysql -pgsql packages) are now priority important.
If something else, like Tasks or so, needs to be changed too: Whoever
needs to do that please do it. Thanks.
--
bye, Joerg
[ New Maintainer
Hi,
I think I found a way to handle this gracefully in wanna-build:
Am Samstag, den 12.07.2008, 00:29 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes:
So I conclude that Dep-Wait on exact versions are cleared when the
appropriate binaries appear in the archive.
Sure, that's not the problem. The problem appears
Hi,
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Some of them: fontconfig-config, blender, openjdk-6-jre,
openoffice.org-core, vlc. And, as I understand, it leads to 93 bugs of
serious severity and yet another pain for release team.
ttf-opensymbol comes out of openoffice.org itself (easily checkable) and is
[Eugene V. Lyubimkin]
Should I mass-file the bugs or this situation can be resolved
through different approach?
Your message was a bit short on exactly what problem you are trying to
solve. How is the font dependency affecting users of the packages? I
suspect fontconfig-config work on the
Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ttf-opensymbol comes out of openoffice.org itself (easily checkable) and
is needed for basic operation. You won't get any bullet in OOos lists
without it.
Even if you're running an X font server on a different host that is
providing that font? Does
2008/7/15 Eugene V. Lyubimkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Then I searched the Debian archive (in case of TrueType fonts):
$ grep-aptavail -F Depends ttf- -s Package | wc -l
93
$ grep-aptavail \( -F Recommends ttf- --or -F Suggests ttf- \)
- --and ! -F Depends ttf- -s Package | wc -l
101
So,
Package: reportbug
Please give some indication that debian-release should only be mailed
for removals for testing *only*, and not for those that should happen in
unstable too.
For example:
| Is the removal to be done in a suite other than unstable? Please press
Enter for unstable
|
| 1
Hi Dato,
thanks for the report!
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 00:57, Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: reportbug
Please give some indication that debian-release should only be mailed
for removals for testing *only*, and not for those that should happen in
unstable too.
For example:
* Sebastian Dröge [Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:58:56 +0200]:
Hi,
please schedule binNMUs for all packages that built with libglib2.0-dev
(= 2.16.4-1) on big endian architectures.
This version of GLib had a bug, caused by changed behaviour of
AC_C_BIGENDIAN in autoconf 2.62, that resulted in
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 12:23:50PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:44:33PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
licq in stable is currently unusable due to server-side changes (see bug
#488934). The patch is trivial and I have confirmed that it applies to
the stable version
Dear Release Managers,
Following packages are both ready to enter lenny. Please add hints.
=== lxnm:
= Not in testing for 36 days.
If things don't change, it won't be part of lenny!
See http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=lxnm
=== lxpanel:
= No migration to testing for 23
Howdy release team,
As documented in the thread at
URL:http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2008/07/msg1.html, the
combination of 'debhelper' 7, 'python-central', and 'python-support'
cause FTBFS issues.
These issues are resolved by new versions of 'debhelper' (= 0.7.14)
and
35 matches
Mail list logo
