Hmm...
It's right that some of my comments are rather harsh, though you must
know that I'm not speaking from a personal perspective.
Personally (and as Release Manager), I would be very happy to have a
good working hppa port for Squeeze and beyond.
I made sure that the hppa port was included
Hi!
Please find attached a proposed update for irssi in lenny to fix
CVE-2009-1959. It's a too minor issue to warrant a DSA so I have to go
this path.
I chose this versioning because the next version after 0.8.12-6 was a
new upstream version so there is no need to special
Hi!
* Gerfried Fuchs rho...@debian.at [2009-06-19 11:48:30 CEST]:
Please find attached a proposed update for irssi in lenny to fix
CVE-2009-1959. It's a too minor issue to warrant a DSA so I have to go
this path.
I noticed that I fumbled with the distribution part in the changelog,
Hi,
Could you unblock dmraid/1.0.0.rc15-8 please?
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I take a regular look at various arches why packages are not
correctly built. hppa is the most annoying arch for me. If you
look at the stats you will notice that it's almost always
the lowest in the stats. The reason it more or less keeps up is
because I put alot of time in looking at the state
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 05:15:26PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Here is a list of packages that failed to build because of instability
on the buildds today:
package | buildd | error
qgit| penalosa | make: *** [install] Segmentation fault
acpica-unix | peri | make: *** [install]
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 06:56:50PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
I am preparing packages suitable for oldstable and stable
now. I will reply with interdiffs once I have prepared them.
Lenny interdiff attached. Note that as alluded to in the
copyright hunk, the orig tarball is modified by removing
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 06:56:50PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
I am preparing packages suitable for oldstable and stable
now. I will reply with interdiffs once I have prepared them.
Etch attached. Essentially the same as lenny.
diff -u freedoom-0.5/debian/changelog
The octave3.2 package failed to autobuild on ia64 and is stuck on
powerpc. This is blocking our planned transition of the octave-forge
packages from octave3.0 to octave3.2 [1].
The failure on caballero is due to the infamous alternatives problem [2] but
nobody seem to care. I wish I could ask
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:49:34PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
The octave3.2 package failed to autobuild on ia64 and is stuck on
powerpc. This is blocking our planned transition of the octave-forge
packages from octave3.0 to octave3.2 [1].
The failure on caballero is due to the
* Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be [2009-06-19 23:48]:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:49:34PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
The octave3.2 package failed to autobuild on ia64 and is stuck on
powerpc. This is blocking our planned transition of the octave-forge
packages from octave3.0 to octave3.2
I have uploaded the new packages to a temporary repository
at http://debian.halfcoded.net/:
oldstable:
http://debian.halfcoded.net/source/freedoom_0.5+dfsg1-1.dsc
stable:
http://debian.halfcoded.net/source/freedoom_0.6.2+dfsg1-1.dsc
Please let me know if they are OK for uploading
12 matches
Mail list logo