Hi!
I would like to upload a new version of roundcube to unstable.
roundcube (0.3.1-5) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
* Depends on php-mail-mime 1.7.0 or more recent to handle correctly
'mime_param_folding' directive. Closes: #588295.
* Add Danish debconf translation, thanks to Joe Dalton.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package pyxpcom
As part of what could be called the iceweasel/xulrunner package overhaul,
the python-xpcom binary package is now built from the pyxpcom source
package. Now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
I am preparing an upload of japitools that I would like to enter
Squeeze; I have attached the changes from the -2 to the -3 upload and I
have also uploaded the package to mentors.d.n[1].
I have pasted the latest changelog entry for quick
Le mercredi 1 septembre 2010 13:09:01 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud, vous avez écrit :
(Note also that 0.6.19 only ships new translations, and is pending).
Note that I just fixed the Windows 7 install yesterday, and I'd like to get
0.6.19 in Squeeze instead. Planned debdiff is attached.
TIA,
OdyX
--
Please reverse saytime 1.0-22 from testing, and put back 1.0-21.
1.0-22 has a grave bug #587124 which makes it totally unusable, plus,
although I don't wish to insult the maintainer, it has been rewritten very
poorly, and is not production code.
1.0-21 works OK (but not great, it only works
Hi.
Excerpts from Julien Cristau's message of Qua Set 01 21:52:43 -0300 2010:
(...)
FWIW this won't migrate until haskell-gtk is fixed to build on s390.
I'll try to debug the haskell-gtk build on s390.
debian-admin: Can you please install the build-deps?
Greetings.
(...)
--
marcot
Hi Ariel,
On Donnerstag, 2. September 2010, Ariel wrote:
Please reverse saytime 1.0-22 from testing, and put back 1.0-21.
thats sadly not directly possible. What is possible is either removal from
testing or reupload of a fixed version...
1.0-22 has a grave bug #587124 which makes it totally
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 04:39:16AM -0400, Ariel wrote:
Please reverse saytime 1.0-22 from testing, and put back 1.0-21.
1.0-22 has a grave bug #587124 which makes it totally unusable,
plus, although I don't wish to insult the maintainer, it has been
rewritten very poorly, and is not production
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva wrote:
Hi.
Excerpts from Julien Cristau's message of Qua Set 01 21:52:43 -0300 2010:
(...)
FWIW this won't migrate until haskell-gtk is fixed to build on s390.
I'll try to debug the haskell-gtk build on s390.
debian-admin: Can you
grub2 (1.98+20100804-2 to 1.98+20100804-4)
Maintainer: GRUB Maintainers
Too young, only 9 of 10 days old
Not touching package due to block request by freeze (contact
debian-release if update is needed)
Updating grub-pc fixes old bugs: #582342
Not considered
grub2
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 03:51:43PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 14:42:50 +0900, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
I prepared a fix for #590654, debdiff attached. The .deb looks okay to
me, but as I don't have a ISDN card, I could not do any real testing.
Is the release
hi folks,
please unblock fastdep, the previous version in unstable (-12) failed to
build on armel due to toolchain changes, I suspect the same is true for
the version currently in testing (-11). There was an unblock request for
-12 already, but it doesn't apply to -13. the changes between -12
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
The current version of totem-plugin-arte in testing is broken.
A fixed version is in experimental but it depends on gst-plugins-bad 0.10.20,
which is not out yet (so it wont be in
On Thu, September 2, 2010 11:06, Robert Lemmen wrote:
please unblock fastdep, the previous version in unstable (-12) failed to
build on armel due to toolchain changes, I suspect the same is true for
the version currently in testing (-11). There was an unblock request for
-12 already, but it
Your message dated Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:12:13 +0100
with message-id
6bb692a65aba43d4351693bd315b5624.squir...@adsl.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#595238: RM: totem-plugin-arte/0.8.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #595238,
regarding RM: totem-plugin-arte/0.8.4-1
to be marked as done.
On Tue, August 31, 2010 14:21, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
I've uploaded the version batman-adv-kernelland 2010.0.0-2 to unstable. It
fixes rc bugs #593471, #593472, #593519 and #593724 and the important bug
#593473. All those patches were already send to the Linux stable tree
maintainers and were
Your message dated Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:17:05 +0100
with message-id
37e1be064a1574b174a46ef013261718.squir...@adsl.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#595215: unblock: pyxpcom/1:0.0~hg20100212-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #595215,
regarding unblock: pyxpcom/1:0.0~hg20100212-2
to be
On Thu, September 2, 2010 05:25, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
You're still unconditionally removing /etc/cron.d/tumgreyspf without
checking whether the user has modified it, however.
[...]
Now, if I was to calculate the md5sum of the /etc/cron.d/tumgreyspf and
remove it if it
Hi again,
On 08/25/2010 08:53 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 17:33 +0200, Dario Minnucci wrote:
On 06/19/2010 11:51 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I've been reviewing the few remaining packages in s-p-u in
preparation for the upcoming point release and had a couple of
comments
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ruby1.8
It fixes #595034 (ruby threading problems on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD).
unblock ruby1.8/1.8.7.302-2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT
Your message dated Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:50:59 +0200
with message-id 20100902125059.gr10...@patate.is-a-geek.org
and subject line Re: Bug#595245: unblock: ruby1.8/1.8.7.302-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #595245,
regarding unblock: ruby1.8/1.8.7.302-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Hi Mathieu,
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 16:30:50 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
GDCM 2.0.15 is a file based system, so the buffer overrun has little impact
on security and such. I guess if this is too much work, leave it that way.
OK, in that case I think I'll leave it as it is. I don't feel
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:14:50 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 06:35:48PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
Then can you help with the second part of my question? I still don't
think I can review a 16k lines diff, or an iso.
Well neither can I. I have no idea how to
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 18:37:11 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
Would you mind having us upload 3.5.4 packages in unstable, eventually
blocking it artificially for more than 10 days so that it is tested
enough by unstable users?
I
Hmm...it works fine here using aptitude. We can Provide: hal-cups-utils
in system-config-printer-udev but that doesn't make sense.
Maybe Breaks and Replaces hal-cups-utils instead of Conflicts?
- Fabian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Your message dated Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:51:24 +0200
with message-id 20100902135124.gw10...@patate.is-a-geek.org
and subject line Re: Bug#594825: RM: henplus/0.9.7.ds1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #594825,
regarding RM: henplus/0.9.7.ds1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Hi,
As stated in another message, next upstream firefox release is scheduled
for next week. On top of (obviously) the upstream changes, I would like
to apply the attached debian changes, to both code and packaging.
I do realize it's not a good time for big modifications of the build
system, but
Am 02.09.2010 16:33, schrieb Julien Cristau:
Policy §7.6.2 says Conflicts+Replaces, afaict?
AFAIUI from Policy 3.9.0.0 [1] onward, §7.3 even recommends usage of
Breaks+Replaces, please read the last paragraph in [2] and the
footnote in [3]).
- Fabian
[1]
On 09/01/2010 10:24 AM, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
In the next few days upstream will release chromium 6 in the stable
channel.
Upstream just released chromium 6:
http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2010/09/stable-and-beta-channel-updates.html
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 04:33:09PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 15:29:26 +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Hmm...it works fine here using aptitude. We can Provide: hal-cups-utils
in system-config-printer-udev but that doesn't make sense.
Maybe Breaks and Replaces
Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 18:37:11 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
Would you mind having us upload 3.5.4 packages in unstable, eventually
blocking it artificially for more than 10 days so that
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 09:40 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 01/09/10 04:10, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
this package has been tried four times and every time we see a different
build error:
#1 (on lebrun):segfault in gcc
#2 (on schroeder): segfault in python (i.e. scons, the build
Hi,
On Wed Sep 01, 2010 at 14:44:09 +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
Hi,
I request xrdp 0.5.0~20100303cvs-6 to be included in squeeze as it fixes
an important bug (#584666) that enables xrdp to be usable with commonly
necessary characters (@). That's important for at least all german users
of
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Peter, hi all,
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Peter Leese
leese.pe...@googlemail.com wrote:
I was supplied the patch by a third party. His reasoning behind doing this
way was that he did not want
a
Your message dated Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:33:51 +0100
with message-id
1283452431.14122.167.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
and subject line Re: Bug#590313: RM: sun-java5/stable [ia64] -- ROM; arch ia64
cannot execute i386 binaries
has caused the Debian Bug report #590312,
regarding RM:
Your message dated Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:33:51 +0100
with message-id
1283452431.14122.167.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
and subject line Re: Bug#590313: RM: sun-java5/stable [ia64] -- ROM; arch ia64
cannot execute i386 binaries
has caused the Debian Bug report #590313,
regarding RM:
On 02/09/10 14:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 09:40 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 01/09/10 04:10, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
this package has been tried four times and every time we see a different
build error:
#1 (on lebrun):segfault in gcc
#2 (on schroeder): segfault
Your message dated Thu, 2 Sep 2010 20:19:32 +0200
with message-id 20100902181932.gr3...@ftbfs.de
and subject line Re: Bug#595132: unblock: gnome-disk-utility/2.30.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #595132,
regarding unblock: gnome-disk-utility/2.30.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Hi,
On Thu Sep 02, 2010 at 19:06:42 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
#4 (on schroeder): sigill in gcc
can you please try to compile it with -O0 on schroeder?
--
Martin Zobel-Helas zo...@debian.org | Debian System Administrator
Debian GNU/Linux Developer | Debian
Hi,
I would like to introduce a slight change to libisoburn/0.5.6.pl00-2, adding a
new file debian/xorriso.links. These links would help users (as growisofs) to
call xorriso with different personalities, as it honors several names in
argv[0] respectfully. Longer explanation here:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock the following packages:
ssl-cert 1.0.26: translation, minor packaging stuff
apr 1.4.2-6: various build fixes, memleak
apache2 2.2.16-2: build fix,
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 11:43 +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
Hi Peter, hi all,
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Peter Leese
leese.pe...@googlemail.com wrote:
I was supplied the patch by a third party. His reasoning behind doing this
way was that he did not want
a random filename, but a
Hello Stable Release Managers,
I just uploaded to s-p-u two new versions of these packages that fix
bugs in the defoma hints files they carry.
These uploads were made in agreement with Gürkan Sengün who agreed to
have these fonts being now maintained under the pkg-fonts team
umbrella.
Please
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Severity: normal
Please unblock package octave-nan
It contains only a small patch (see below). The bug is considered
critical by upstream, see
http://bugs.debian.org/594906
There are some other
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Severity: normal
Please unblock package octave-nan
It contains only a small patch (see below). The bug is considered
critical by upstream, see
http://bugs.debian.org/594906
There are some other
Your message dated Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:37:38 +0100
with message-id
1283459858.14122.915.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
and subject line Re: Bug#595293: unblock: apache related packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #595293,
regarding unblock: apache related packages
to be marked
Hi,
On Mon Aug 30, 2010 at 21:45:00 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Can you unblock it now (1.15.8 reached sid on July 29 so it's one month
old now)?
unblocked
--
Martin Zobel-Helas zo...@debian.org | Debian System Administrator
Debian GNU/Linux Developer | Debian
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
It's a temporary file, so the name shouldn't really matter anyway. I'd
still prefer that it just called mkstemp(), but please feel free to
upload, and let us know once the package has been accepted.
Thanks!
I've
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
Please unblock gitolite. The upstream version is mostly a documentation
overhaul, but the major part why this should go into squeeze is that the
debconf templates and the package description went through a
debian-l10n-english swift
Hi,
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 22:15 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
I just uploaded to s-p-u two new versions of these packages that fix
bugs in the defoma hints files they carry.
These uploads were made in agreement with Gürkan Sengün who agreed to
have these fonts being now maintained under
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 20:52 +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
No. Do you want me to upload a version that fixes #580160 to testing?
Yes, please (sorry for the delay :-/)
I've uploaded version 1.7.0-4 to testing.
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 12:15 +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 18:08 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:03:05AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
| Secunia Research has discovered three vulnerabilities in libgdiplus
| for Mono, which can be exploited by
Your message dated Fri, 3 Sep 2010 00:00:58 +0200
with message-id 20100902220058.gw3...@ftbfs.de
and subject line Re: Bug#595303: unblock: gitolite/1.5.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #595303,
regarding unblock: gitolite/1.5.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:06:32AM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 08/26/2010 09:46 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Ping.
Pong…
What's confusing is that upstream's changelog appears in all of those
packages but the changes are only in the first one…
Upstream seem also to advertize
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
Hi Release Team,
In the next few days upstream will release chromium 6 in the stable
channel. This means that v5 will not receive any further (security)
update, and v6 will receive security and stability updates.
I could start to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package torque.
I have just uploaded a new version of torque. I was adding a
binary dependency for the kfreebsd architecture to support OpenMPI
and fixed a typo in
Hi release team,
It seemed lynx-cur isn't unblocked yet and I see no email
from the release team anymore.
I suspect there is communication errors between us.
I'm very sorry if my explanation is not decent enough but
I believe it is necessary to unblock lynx-cur which should
fix a security bug.
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
Given the closeness of the next point release, this will be accepted
after that and included in 5.0.7.
No problem. I expected that.
The fix for #551525 appears to be missing:
Sigh. This is what one gets for using --dry-run with patch
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
libdbd-oracle-perl (contrib) cannot migrate to testing[1] as the
dependency on oracle-instantclient11.2-basic cannot be satisfied: the
package is not in Debian's archive, cf. libdbd-oracle-perl's description
and README.Debian.
The Policy Manual states
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, September 2, 2010 05:25, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
You're still unconditionally removing /etc/cron.d/tumgreyspf without
checking whether the user has modified it, however.
[...]
Now, if I was to calculate the md5sum of the
60 matches
Mail list logo
