Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
notfixed 709490 1.2.9-8+deb7u1
Bug #709490 {Done: Aleksey Kravchenko rhash.ad...@gmail.com}
[release.debian.org] Two disastrous bugs in RHash in Wheezy
There is no source info for the package 'release.debian.org' at version
'1.2.9-8+deb7u1' with
On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 at 09:38:02 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
Does the RT have any opinion on which of the possible resolutions would
be acceptable/preferred for stable?
In the absence of feedback, I've assumed that this one is likely
to be unacceptable:
* upload 0.1.16 to wheezy (~1k lines of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 706142 pu: telepathy-idle/0.1.11-2+deb7u1
Bug #706142 [release.debian.org] tpu (or pu): telepathy-idle/0.1.11-2+deb7u1
Changed Bug title to 'pu: telepathy-idle/0.1.11-2+deb7u1' from 'tpu (or pu):
telepathy-idle/0.1.11-2+deb7u1'
thanks
Alle sabato 15 giugno 2013, Julien Cristau ha scritto:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:11:45 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
I uploaded it some hours ago, and now it is built and installed on
all the archs.
Scheduled binNMUs for kde4libs; will do the others afterwards.
Thanks for all the binNMUs.
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 11:49:54 -0400, Andres Mejia wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
I am
On Sun, 2013-06-16 at 14:10 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 at 09:38:02 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
Does the RT have any opinion on which of the possible resolutions would
be acceptable/preferred for stable?
In the absence of feedback,
Sorry; I've been somewhat
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 706142 - moreinfo
Bug #706142 [release.debian.org] pu: telepathy-idle/0.1.11-2+deb7u1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
706142:
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 12:39:28 -0400, Andres Mejia wrote:
I see the packages were built on the last two archs after retrying.
The packages have been built on all archs now.
Yes, the blockers now are #701606 (rdup FTBFS), #666834
(libapache-mod-musicindex), and #711544 (claws-mail FTBFS).
Processing changes file: chromium-browser_27.0.1453.110-1~deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: chromium-browser_27.0.1453.110-1~deb7u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: mesa_8.0.5-4+deb7u2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze10_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze10_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze10_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze10_ia64.changes
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + pending
Bug #711437 [release.debian.org] pu: package flash-kernel/3.3+deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
711437: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=711437
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + pending wheezy
Bug #711817 [release.debian.org] pu: package dkimpy/0.5.3-1+deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
711817: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=711817
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Control: tags -1 + pending wheezy
On Sun, 2013-06-09 at 23:38 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
python-dkim has a bug that causes signature verificaton to fail in some cases
that is affecting stable users. It's fixed upstream and in unstable and I've
been asked to get it fixed in stable as well.
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 19:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 08:41 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 02:10:25 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Adam, if you feel it's still O-borderline-K-ish for 7.1, please
consider
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + pending
Bug #711717 [release.debian.org] pu: package slbackup-php/0.4.3-3
Added tag(s) pending.
--
711717: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=711717
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Processing changes file: slbackup-php_0.4.3-2+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: flash-kernel_3.3+deb7u2_multi.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dkimpy_0.5.3-1+deb7u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: fail2ban_0.8.6-3wheezy2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To
Processing changes file: subversion_1.6.12dfsg-7_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: subversion_1.6.12dfsg-7_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: subversion_1.6.12dfsg-7_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: subversion_1.6.12dfsg-7_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing
On 16/06/13 19:57, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
Wheezy has both kfreebsd-8 and kfreebsd-9. Shouldn't kfreebsd-8 be dropped
now?
Some other things I'm wondering about are:
stable updates - would we need to keep kfreebsd-8 at least in sid to be
able to do these? If kfreebsd-8 is removed from
18 matches
Mail list logo