Re: suggested mcabber updates for 6.0.1

2011-03-04 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org [2011-03-03 22:47:24 CET]: am Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:26:39PM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben: * Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org [2011-03-03 21:35 +0100]: #612789 - command line corruption http://mcabber.com/hg/index.cgi/rev/75a0a22bbf78 Please

Re: suggested mcabber updates for 6.0.1

2011-03-03 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi, sorry for the late response. On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 09:20:51AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: The mcabber upstream contacted me and told me about a few things they would like to see fixed within squeeze because they consider them rather nasty or at least highly inconvenient for the users.

Re: suggested mcabber updates for 6.0.1

2011-03-03 Thread Mikael Berthe
Hi, * Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org [2011-03-03 21:35 +0100]: #612789 - command line corruption http://mcabber.com/hg/index.cgi/rev/75a0a22bbf78 Please excuse my ignorance, but how is _strmove different than strcpy? Do the strings in question overlap and you thus need to do it yourself

Re: suggested mcabber updates for 6.0.1

2011-03-03 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi, am Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:26:39PM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben: * Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org [2011-03-03 21:35 +0100]: #612789 - command line corruption http://mcabber.com/hg/index.cgi/rev/75a0a22bbf78 Please excuse my ignorance, but how is _strmove different than strcpy?

suggested mcabber updates for 6.0.1

2011-02-22 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Hi! The mcabber upstream contacted me and told me about a few things they would like to see fixed within squeeze because they consider them rather nasty or at least highly inconvenient for the users. I suggested them to file bugreports about the issues together with the patches, which