Re: Post-Receive Hooks

Hi James, thanks for your investigation. I'd welcome if you fix the issues you've found in a manner looking sensible to you. If you need permissions for those repositories you can not access please ping the according team. Kind regards Andreas. On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:20:02PM

Re: R package CI test failures

[Jonathon, please seek for your name in the text below.] Hi Gordon, thanks a lot for your effort about testing R packages. On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:00:05PM +0200, Gordon Ball wrote: > > non-lowercased path for vignette: output contains something like "cannot > stat

Re: autodep8 for R packages?

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 04:59:35PM +0200, Gordon Ball wrote: > Followup: simple load-library tests for R are in autodep8 as of version > 0.5 (now in unstable). Cool. Thanks a lot Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Re: Backporting R

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:14:35AM +0200, Johannes Ranke wrote: > > > > > > > >https://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/r-base.git > > > > Done. > > Very nice. :-) > > > > 2. I inject the current packaging from testing/unstable to this > > > > > > > > repository

Re: Backporting R

Hi Antonio, On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 06:50:40PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > > I've taken this as good reason to upload to backports. > > You might also take into account whether all the other R packages in > jessie proper will work with the R from jessie-backports, specially > those

Re: Backporting R

Hi, On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 07:39:23PM +0200, Johannes Ranke wrote: > > 1. I'll create > > > >https://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/r-base.git Done. > > 2. I inject the current packaging from testing/unstable to this > > repository and create

Re: updated packages: r-cran-afex, r-cran-logspline, r-cran-desolve

On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 02:33:17AM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > some times when you're going through and creating a README.source, and > > documenting, like 50 included R data files (explaining why the source > > contains binary files), when you know that no-one will ever read it ... you > >

Re: How to deal with clapack - is it (or a replacement) packaged

On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 10:00:42AM +0200, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > On 21/04/16 21:43, Andreas Tille wrote: > >>See this blog post for a good reasoning: > >>http://nicolas.limare.net/pro/notes/2014/10/31_cblas_clapack_lapacke/ > > > >While this sounds con

Re: updated packages: r-cran-afex, r-cran-logspline, r-cran-desolve

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 09:35:54AM +1000, Jonathon Love wrote: > >>>Pristine-tar is missing for these two - did not checked the other. > >lintian claimed insecure VCS URLs. The easiest way o fix this is > > > > cme fix dpkg-control > > > >... and so I did. (Please gbp pull). > > my lintian

Re: r-cran-xtable - new upstream

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:07:56PM +1000, Jonathon Love wrote: > > references 5 other docs, which in turn reference a bunch of other docs. a > lot of these seem to assume a familiarity with SVN (which i don't really > have). is there someone on this list, who's a maven at SVN->git conversions >

Re: updated packages: r-cran-afex, r-cran-logspline, r-cran-desolve

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 07:03:36PM +1000, Jonathon Love wrote: > On 21/04/2016 18:21, Andreas Tille wrote: > >Hi Jonathon, > > > >On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 03:38:26PM +1000, Jonathon Love wrote: > >>i've updated the following packages, and pushed to alioth: > >

Re: How to deal with clapack - is it (or a replacement) packaged

Hi again, On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:58:13AM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > >I somehow brute forced a patch > > > >--- a/include/external_libs.h > >+++ b/include/external_libs.h > >@@ -39,8 +39,8 @@ > > #else > > > > #ifndef SKIP_LAPACK > >-#include > >-#include > >+/* #include */ >

Re: How to deal with clapack - is it (or a replacement) packaged

Hi Ritika, On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:58:13AM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > See this blog post for a good reasoning: > http://nicolas.limare.net/pro/notes/2014/10/31_cblas_clapack_lapacke/ What do you think about this and do you think it is sensible / feasible to switch from clapack to

Minor changes to libsdsl

Hi Tomasz, I noticed that the clean target is missing a clean for Make.helper which prevents building the package twice in a row. I added this to the Git repository. I also changed the Vcs fields to Debian Science Git since people might commit changes to the wrong repository and we need to sort

Re: meet package

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 02:25:06PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Andreas, Which Andreas are you talking to? Please note that this name is in Germany quite frequent (recently I was sitting between two other Andreas when running a Debian booth ;-)). Kind regards Andreas (one of many in

Re: autodep8 for R packages?

On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 07:44:50PM +0200, Gordon Ball wrote: > This is my understanding. From [4] "If debian/tests/control is absent, > the autodep8 tool can generate an automatic control file.", so anything > with existing test rules should not be affected. Sounds sensible. > > As an

Re: Bug#819343: ITP: r-cran-dplyr -- A Grammar of Data Manipulation for GNU R

Hi Chris, On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 01:14:37PM -0400, Chris Lawrence wrote: > > It would be simply great if you could confirm that it is OK for you if > > the ITP could be closed by the Debian Science team (alternatively the > > Debian Med team). I'd simply interested to push the package as

Re: Please use Git repository layout as described in Debian Science policy

Hi Thomas, On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:35:42PM +0200, Thomas Schiex wrote: > Hello Andreas, > > I tried to scrupulously follow the debian-science git repository > instructions. I modified the debian/control file as indicated and setup > a new git repo on alioth at > >

Re: Please consider maintaining libdlib in Debian Science team

Hi, On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:14:53AM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > On 04/04/16 09:18, Séverin Lemaignan wrote: > >Hi Andreas! > > > >Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> wrote: > >>Would you consider moving the packaging into Debian Science Git > >&

Please consider maintaining libdlib in Debian Science team

Hi Séverin, I came across libdlib since I need it for some scientific software (seer) and also want to backport it to Jessie. This would be more easy if I could commit the needed changes to a VCS and as far as I can see this package would be a nice fit for the Debian Science team and I just

Re: autodep8 for R packages?

Hi, On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 09:42:48PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 30 March 2016 at 23:16, Gordon Ball wrote: > | For the set of R packages I recently uploaded, I added trivial DEP-8 > | tests* which did: > | > | R -e "if (! require('$pkg')) quit(status=1)" > > require() is

Re: Bug#819343: ITP: r-cran-dplyr -- A Grammar of Data Manipulation for GNU R

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 08:28:54AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > Andreas. > > > > > > [1] > > > svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/R/r-cran-dplyr/trunk/ > > > > One of these decades I'll have to learn how to use VCSes

Re: ITP: r-cran-r6 -- R classes with reference semantics

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:31:10PM +0200, Gordon Ball wrote: > > Let's try again; r-cran-uuid and r-cran-pbdzmq in debian-science git > should be fixed. Updated packages assigning maintainership to > debian-science-maintainers at the links below: > >

Re: Bug#819343: ITP: r-cran-dplyr -- A Grammar of Data Manipulation for GNU R

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 07:02:04AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > | Could you please explain what size exactly is doubled? As far as I > | understood r-cran-bh would be just a wrapper for the Debian packaged > | libboost. > > Nope. As I explained to you before and in this thread, there is

Re: Bug#819343: ITP: r-cran-dplyr -- A Grammar of Data Manipulation for GNU R

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 06:21:55AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > | I talked about this with Dirk[1] and may be I should have done this for > | the moment as well. Meanwhile Dirk has ITPed r-cran-bh (#819389) and > | has uploaded it to new - so this should be dealt with hopefully soon. > >

Re: secure URIs for Vcs fields?

On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 04:46:14PM -0400, Doug Torrance wrote: > > On 03/26/2016 04:37 PM, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > >It seems the Lintian page could need an update, as well as the > >debian-science-policy page? Oh, it is more than two years old, it was > >probably written before secure URIs

Please use Git repository layout as described in Debian Science policy

Hi Thomas, I had a look into the repository of toulbar2[1] since you asked for sponsering of the package. I noticed that it does not follow the repository layout as specified in the Debian Science policy[2] and also the control file diverges from Debian Science policy (Maintainer should be the

Re: Bug#819392: ITP: geg -- GTK+ Equation Grapher

Hi Georges, On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 06:00:23AM +0200, Georges Khaznadar wrote: > > My last tries were not successful, due to miscellaneous reasons, maybe > we can sort out some of them now? > > - lack of permission (this sound sensible as I did not step forward > previously): >

Re: Bug#819343: ITP: r-cran-dplyr -- A Grammar of Data Manipulation for GNU R

Hi Chris, On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 08:45:41PM -0400, Chris Lawrence wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org> wrote: > > Thanks for this ITP since it is also on my list of needed packages for > > r-cran-treescape which needs several dependen

Re: Bug#819392: ITP: geg -- GTK+ Equation Grapher

Hi Georges, it would be nice if you would maintain this package inside the Debian Science team. Kind regards Andreas. On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 01:19:56AM +0200, Georges Khaznadar wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Georges Khaznadar > > * Package

Re: Bug#815871: ITP: holoviews -- visualization library for scientific or engineering data

Hi Sandro, it would be nice if you would forward ITPs like this to the Debian Science mailing list. It would also make sense to maintain the packag inside the Debian Science team. Kind regards Andreas. On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 03:19:30AM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Package: wnpp >

Re: ITP: r-cran-r6 -- R classes with reference semantics

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 04:34:36PM +0200, Gordon Ball wrote: > > I have uploaded r-cran-r6. The other two packages are lacking a > > pristine-tar branch that should be provided according to Debian Science > > policy to enable others easily obtaining the upstream tarball. Even if > > it is

Re: ITP: r-cran-r6 -- R classes with reference semantics

Andreas. > Gordon > > [1]: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/r-cran-r6.git/ > [2]: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/r-cran-uuid.git/ > [3]: > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/r-cran-pbdzmq.git/ > > > On 22/0

Re: Join debian-science team

Hi Gordon, On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:53:31AM +0100, Gordon Ball wrote: > I recently uploaded > > r-cran-uuid > r-cran-pbdzmq > r-cran-r6 > > the source for which is currently in collab-maint. > > Andreas asked if these repositories can be moved to the debian-science > team, to

Checking tasks files for next Debian Science metapackages release

[I'm repeating this mail since it did not came through with attchement. it was replaced by a link.] Hi folks, I think its time to trigger the next release of Debian Science metapackages. Before I do so I usually check whether all packages maintained by the Debian Science packaging team are

Re: Debian ITP for toulbar2

Hi Thomas, sorry for my late reply - I was on vacation. It would have been to continue the discussion on the mailing list I CCed (which I do now as well) since others could have helped you in the meantime. On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 04:34:25PM +0100, Thomas Schiex wrote: > Dear Andreas > > I'm

Problems using OpenCL in pbuilder (Was: OpenCL GPU usage on autobuilders)

wonder what exactly I need to do to let the test below pass and enable the detection of a smart enough GPU in pbuilder. Thanks for any help Andreas. On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 08:27:46AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > I just realised that the issue also happens on my loca

Statically linked library in libdevel packages? (Was: Status of teem package (packaging moved from svn to git))

[Moving this thread to debian-devel ...] Hi, On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:46:56PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 08:59:27AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > > > wait, why would you want to build a static library? > > > A static library is

Re: Team maintenance in Debian Science for pdl? (Was: pdl: Fails to build with GSL 2)

Hi Henning, On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:10:14PM +0100, Henning Glawe wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 08:27:44AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > since it would be great to fix #805824 soon which seems pretty easy > > considering the patch I would like to offer an NMU. Ho

Re: Dropping astronomy and astronomy-dev from debian-science

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 05:37:55PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> writes: > > you might like consider to simply add the according metapackages > > to the Debian Science tasks. I think from an advertising point of > > view it would b

Re: Dropping astronomy and astronomy-dev from debian-science

Hi Ole, On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 04:18:05PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > I just got the message that the "debian-astro" metapackage is > accepted. Congratulations and thanks for your fine work on this. > The content of the package were taken from the astronomy and > astronomy-dev tasks of

Team maintenance in Debian Science for pdl? (Was: pdl: Fails to build with GSL 2)

Hi Henning, since it would be great to fix #805824 soon which seems pretty easy considering the patch I would like to offer an NMU. However, it would be even more sensible to move the package under Debian Science team maintenance and maintain it in Debian Science Git since it is part of several

Re: engrid in debian

On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 11:07:39PM +0100, Mauro Darida wrote: > If you have more time I will really appreciate how > you can injecting packages into debian science git: can you please provide > some links to learn about it ? https://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience/ContributingToDebianScience

Would you consider to run cme to fix d/control

Hi Jerome, since I noticed that Vcs-Browser had an old format (lintian would have informed about this) I was running cme fix dpkg-control which resulted in several changes. I would prefer to apply these changes but the diff is a bit to much for me to upload it without your consensus. So

Re: packaging a parallel R

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 02:35:25PM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote: > hi, > > i'm wanting to create a deb package for a parallel R installation. > > the software i'm working toward packaging, JASP, has some issues with > the versions of R from CRAN, and i'd like to provide a parallel version > of R

Re: CC-BY-3.0 license for copyright file

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 07:26:25PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > >however, i can only find HTML versions of the license, and it will take > >some time to format this appropriately. lynx -dump ? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Re: r-cran-afex is ready for upload

Hi Jonathon On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 04:32:44PM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote: > hi andreas, > > r-cran-afex is ready for upload But it needs r-cran-lsmeans. Regarding r-cran-bms which you added to SoB I have two remarks: - Please add a debian/upstream/metadata file with the reference[1]

Re: r-cran-afex is ready for upload

Hi Jonathon, On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 09:36:18AM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote: > On 21/09/2015 9:23 am, Andreas Tille wrote: > >> r-cran-afex is ready for upload > > > > But it needs r-cran-lsmeans. > > ah yes, i thought that had already gone. it's ready for upload.

Re: Bug#617296: RFP: rstudio -- IDE for GNU R

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 08:41:39AM +0100, Iain R. Learmonth wrote: > > > Regarding sponsering: I'd happily sponsor RStudio. I do not require > > any upload to mentors.debian.net since I build from Debian Science Git > > repository anyway. > > Andreas - if you're too busy once the package is

Re: Bug#617296: RFP: rstudio -- IDE for GNU R

Hi, On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 02:05:44AM +, nore...@alioth.debian.org wrote: > ChangZhuo Chen (czchen) has requested to join your project. > You can approve this request here: > https://alioth.debian.org/project/admin/users.php?group_id=100159 > > Comments by the user: > I could like to

Re: r-cran-bms is ready for upload

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:26:20AM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote: > > Regarding r-cran-bms which you added to SoB I have two remarks: > > > > - Please add a debian/upstream/metadata file with the reference[1] > >mentioned in inst/CITATIONS > > done. (but you might want to cast your eye over

Re: Re: packaging Q: package tests have dependencies

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 09:13:55PM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote: > > > >thanks. so i would only put it in build dependencies (source > >dependencies), and not the dependency for the binary? > > > >with thanks > > I think you want the tests to run after the software has been built and > before it is

Re: Bug#704782: trilinos: new package for Trilinos 11.x

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 05:09:42PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: > ... > I'd be happy to co-maintain this package with you in Debian and review and > sponsor your uploads. +1 > Debian Science List, what needs to be done before uploading a new version? > I don't see that the package was ever

Re: packaging Q: package tests have dependencies

Hi Jonathon, On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:50:18AM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote: > >> > >> i'm working on packaging the BayesFactor R package, but the first line > >> in it calls > >> > >> library(testthat) > >> > >> this isn't needed by the package, and so isn't listed as a dependency. > >> do i need

Re: debian-science sprint?

On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:15:35PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote: > >I can only support Christian - get it off. The downside is that "Seaside > >during Winter" is a Debian Med theme already :) > >Could we possibly

Re: r-cran-lsmeans package

On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 04:48:18PM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote: > hi andreas, > > i think the r-cran-lsmeans package is ready to go (or have i overlooked > something?) I've built the package three days ago but had forget the final upload. Thanks for the ping - its uploaded now. Kind regards

Re: debian-science sprint?

Hi Christian, as said in Heidelberg, I'm in favour of such a meeting. However, I'd only join a Weekend (Fr-So) not a full week. Thanks for your effort Andreas. On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 04:41:28PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > Hi, > a few of us met in Heidelberg where Andreas

Re: packages which are actually GPL2 only

On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:58:38PM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote: > hi andreas, > > i've just figured out that a bunch of my packages are being rejected for > containing the "or (at your option) a later version" when they are GPL2 > only :/ > > i have committed the fixes, and the following packages

Re: ITP: arb -- C library for arbitrary-precision floating-point ball arithmetic

On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 08:00:24PM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote: > >>What can I do to cope with this name issue? > > As you see I have already seen there would be an issue ; notice that > renaming my duplicate src:arb to src:libarb won't solve the problem that > there is already binary libarb and

Re: ITP: arb -- C library for arbitrary-precision floating-point ball arithmetic

Hi Julien, please make sure you will name the package libarb since there is a package arb in Debian (actually not in Debian but in non-free). Kind regards Andreas. On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:00:22PM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Julien Puydt

Re: r-cran-desolve: lintian warnings

ACK for what Anton wrote and to Jonathon please push your repository: $ gbp clone ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/r-cran-desolve.git gbp:error: Git command failed: Error running git checkout: error: pathspec 'master' did not match any file(s) known to git. BTW, I uploaded

Re: r-cran-rinside good to go

Hi Jonathon, On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 03:09:59PM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote: > > > > I would have loved if the patch would have been discussed - IMHO it is > > sensible. > > oh ok. still figuring out how much autonomy i'm supposed to exhibit. i > do like to lead with a concrete implementation -

Re: r-cran-desolve: lintian warnings

On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 08:54:41PM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote: > >$ gbp clone > > ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/r-cran-desolve.git > > gbp:error: Git command failed: Error running git checkout: error: pathspec > > 'master' did not match any file(s) known to git. > > oh

Re: r-cran-rinside good to go

Hi Dirk, On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 12:07:04PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 31 August 2015 at 18:40, Jonathon Love wrote: > | hi andreas. > | > | r-cran-rinside should be good to go. > > Is there a reason I shouldn't maintain, being upstream and all that? At first sight I see two

Re:

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:11:04PM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote: hi andreas PS: Please confirm that you have read this since I did not CCed you as per list policy. i didn't get it, but i've figured out i've been subscribed to the debian-science-maintainers list, rather than

Re: r-cran-vcdextra package

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 07:09:59PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: Hi, 2015-08-26 23:18 GMT+02:00 Aaron M. Ucko a...@alum.mit.edu: Because this upload introduced new package names, it is sitting in the NEW queue waiting for ftpmaster review. It just got accepted. Thanks to to FTP Master Team!

Re: ITP: r-cran-estimability

Hi Jonathon, On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 01:14:18PM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote: i have prepared the r-cran-estimability package, and i think it is ready to go. i have: - created an ITP #797173 (i tried to CC the mailing list, but i stuffed it up) - created an entry in /Sponsoring of

Re: ITP: r-cran-estimability

Hi Jonathon, On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 02:31:42PM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote: I doubt t his if I see the long description that stretches over a single line. If you are using cme from unstable you can simply do: my lintian *really* doesn't give me a warning about this. neither when i build

Re: ITP: r-cran-estimability

Hi, On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 03:22:31PM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote: There is no specific switch since as far as I know warnings are displayed by default. In any case it might be helpful to have the following: i've updated my lintian to be the latest version (2.5.36.1) but it still

Re: r-cran-elliptic package

HI, even if I now have uploaded the package I would like you to create an autopkgtest suite to run the R file in the tests dir. To get an example you might like to have a look into the r-cran-spatstat package. Kind regards Andreas. PS: Please confirm that you have read this since I did

Re: RFS: gpaw/0.10.0.11364 ITP -- DFT and beyond within the projector-augmented wave method

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 08:56:15AM +0200, Marcin Dulak wrote: Thanks, the updated package is at https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/gpaw.git Sponsored upload to new done. Thanks for your work on this package Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Re: r-cran-vcdextra package

On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 05:30:15PM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote: hi andreas, i've sent a couple of emails to the list regarding the r-cran-vcdextra package, but perhaps you overlooked them. I guess its your turn to respond to my message The Dependency r-cran-gnm is missing as I wrote in my

Re: R: Bug#795643: RFS: graywolf/0.1.2-2

May be I should stick more to the last SoB condition tried twice to find another sponsor in your team but failed which I totally ignored since SoB started. :-) I'd love if people find other sponsors ... or even apply for DM themselves after getting 10 packages sponsored or so. Kind regards

Re: RFS: gpaw/0.10.0.11364 ITP -- DFT and beyond within the projector-augmented wave method

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 06:37:26PM +0200, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: That was a pre-thread to the d-d-a plan to deprecate Python 2 long-term, it is not (and has not) been an ftpmaster policy to block python2 uploads. I didn't send that email with an ftpteam hat on (it also doesn't mention any

Re: r-cran-vcdextra package

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:45:15AM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote: hi andreas, I have no idea how you checked this out but you probably forgot to add the --pristine-tar option. Please check again the policy document. ah yes, i've added the pristine-tar branch on alioth. can you tell me if

Re: r-cran-vcdextra package

Hi Jonathon, On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 02:57:06PM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote: I have no idea how you checked this out but you probably forgot to add the --pristine-tar option. Please check again the policy document. the pristine-tar branch should be there now. was that the only thing

Re: r-cran-vcdextra package

Hi Jonathon, I have no idea how you checked this out but you probably forgot to add the --pristine-tar option. Please check again the policy document. Kind regards Andreas. On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 02:08:28PM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote: hi andreas, i figured out how to add the

Re: r-cran-vcdextra package

Hi Jonathon, On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 04:15:38PM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote: I have done the following: * submitted an ITP (794842) Good. * added r-cran-vcdextra to the /sponsoring of blends/ page. I noted this. Further remarks to the package: The repository is lacking upstream and

Re: r-cran-vcdextra package

Hi Jonathon, On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 10:11:55PM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote: hi andreas, For Debian Science please refer to the Wiki page where I maintain Sponsering of Blends[1]. Please add an entry at the end of this table once the package shows up on one of the Debian Science pages

Re: [j...@thon.cc: Re: request for new project on alioth]

On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 09:26:17AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: Thanks. Any other admin volunteer? I'd be happy to add another active member. Although I am more active in Debian-Astro, you could add me here -- just to have some redundancy in adding new members... You are now admin as

Re: r-cran-vcdextra package

Hi Jonathon, On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 03:10:07PM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote: i've committed the vcdextra package to debian sciences; i think it is good to go. can you take a look when you get the chance? thanks for working on this package. However, please do not ping me in private mail. I

Re: [j...@thon.cc: Re: request for new project on alioth]

Hi Lionel, On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 08:49:18AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 04:01:51PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: it seems there is some bottleneck to accept new users. Could somebody please check the user applications (or grant admin permissions to user

[j...@thon.cc: Re: request for new project on alioth]

:33:01 +0200 From: Jonathon Love j...@thon.cc To: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Subject: Re: request for new project on alioth Did you applied for Debian Science yet? yup, a few days ago now. jonathon -- JASP - A Fresh Way to Do Statistics http://jasp-stats.org/ -- How happy is he born

Re: Contributing some R packages

[Hi Debian Science readers. This is a followup to the thread starting here https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/2015-July/033697.html ] Hi Jonathon, On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:16:42PM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote: I can not see the connection to medicine and

Fwd: Schedule information for 214 - Debian Science BoF

FYI Andreas. - Forwarded message from Maximiliano Curia m...@debian.org - Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 16:56:51 - From: Maximiliano Curia m...@debian.org To: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Cc: DebConf Content Team cont...@debconf.org Subject: Schedule information for 214 - Debian

Re: RFS: parmetis - Parallel Graph Partitioning and Sparse Matrix Ordering Libs

Hi Wolfgang, you might like to consider Sponsering of Blends: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianPureBlends/SoB Kind regards Andreas. On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:44:03PM +0200, Wolfgang Fuetterer wrote: Hi all, I'm looking for a sponsor for libparmetis. * Package name:

Re: updated python-ase / gpaw

Hi Graham, On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 05:53:20PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: On 24/07/2015 16:53, Andreas Tille wrote: I noticed that ase also should work with Python 3 and thus added a Python 3 package. OK. I had read that Python3 wasn't supported yet [1]: I simply did: $ grep 3\.4 * 2

Re: RFS: gpaw/0.10.0.11364 ITP -- DFT and beyond within the projector-augmented wave method

Hi Marcin, On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 06:31:16PM +0200, Marcin Dulak wrote: On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote: it would be nice if you would follow the list etiquette and not CC single authors. Thanks. OK, didn't know about that. Was just doing replay all

Re: updated python-ase / gpaw

Hi Graham, On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 04:09:22PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: Update: new upstream version 3.9.1.4567 was released. I have updated my packaging and I would like someone to review and hopefully sponsor the upload. Thanks for your work on this. Andreas did already offer [2]. I

Re: [Debichem-devel] updated python-ase / gpaw

Hi Graham. On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 07:04:08PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: If you want to push on a quick update I'm fine with reverting this change. However, at some point in time you will need to do it anyway. Its youe choice when you want to do this. At this stage, I'd prefer if we

Re: RFS: gpaw/0.10.0.11364 ITP -- DFT and beyond within the projector-augmented wave method

Hi Marcin, On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:30:32PM +0200, Marcin Dulak wrote: ~/gpaw $ cme fix dpkg-control Unknown application: dpkg-control. Run 'cme list' to list available applications Did you installed libconfig-model-dpkg-perl ? An attempt to get jessie-testing-unstable failed, so i've

Re: RFS: gpaw/0.10.0.11364 ITP -- DFT and beyond within the projector-augmented wave method

Hi Marcin. it would be nice if you would follow the list etiquette and not CC single authors. Thanks. On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 03:41:07PM +0200, Marcin Dulak wrote: Hi Marcin, On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:30:32PM +0200, Marcin Dulak wrote: ~/gpaw $ cme fix dpkg-control Unknown

Re: RFS: gpaw/0.10.0.11364 ITP -- DFT and beyond within the projector-augmented wave method

Hi Marcin, On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:09:47AM +0200, Marcin Dulak wrote: the latest gpaw-0.11.0 upstream has python3 support ( https://wiki.fysik.dtu.dk/gpaw/devel/releasenotes.html#version-0-11-0), but this will require python-ase-3.9.1 to be packaged for python3 The later is work in

Re: RFS: gpaw/0.10.0.11364 ITP -- DFT and beyond within the projector-augmented wave method

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:07:15PM +0200, Marcin Dulak wrote: Moreover I'm afraid ftpmaster will not accept this package since there is a policy to refuse new Python 2 only packages. Could you check whether gpaw could be ported to Python 3? there is a work upstream on porting to

Re: RFS: gpaw/0.10.0.11364 ITP -- DFT and beyond within the projector-augmented wave method

Hi, On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:17:43PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: See the prior discussion, I though it was more in line with the rest of the science packages to call it -data. I'm perfectly fine with the -data name - but I see no reason why the source package should have a different name.

Re: Bug#787329: RFS: gpaw/0.10.0.11364 ITP -- DFT and beyond within the projector-augmented wave method

Hi, On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:18:04PM +0200, Marcin Dulak wrote: tasks (which does not mean that I will refuse SoB for sure ;-)). we have discussed the reason why gpaw-setups (gpaw-data) should be shipped by Debian. The discussion starts here:

Re: RFS: gpaw/0.10.0.11364 ITP -- DFT and beyond within the projector-augmented wave method

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:26:43PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: On 07/22/2015 04:11 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: Moreover I'm afraid ftpmaster will not accept this package since there is a policy to refuse new Python 2 only packages. Huh? Since when should there be such a policy? Discussion

Re: RFS: gpaw/0.10.0.11364 ITP -- DFT and beyond within the projector-augmented wave method

Hi Marcin, On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:32:09AM +0200, Marcin Dulak wrote: so I need gpaw-setups somehow listed at http://blends.debian.org/science/tasks/physics I see gpaw is already there. How can I get gpaw-setups listed there too? By adding it to the physics tasks in the debian-science

Re: Bug#787329: RFS: gpaw/0.10.0.11364 ITP -- DFT and beyond within the projector-augmented wave method

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:24:09PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:18:04PM +0200, Marcin Dulak wrote: There is a new GPAW release (just today), but this requires python-ase-3.9.0 which is not in Debian yet. I did post about this a week ago to debian-science and

Re: RFS: gpaw/0.10.0.11364 ITP -- DFT and beyond within the projector-augmented wave method

Hi Michael, On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:04:33AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: gpaw-setups is a dependency of gpaw and not very useful independently I think? So I wonder why it should be on the blends page, do we assume users might want to install it on its own? You are correct - it does not

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >