Hi Thorsten,
Thanks for your the time to review g4-data. Wrt to the license: I'll
ask some of my contacts at CERN.
However what is somewhat more important to me is if the license is
suitable for Debian non-free at all. I can upload Geant4 (the
software) basically any time, but I figured if
Hi,
geant4-data was rejected before due to this part in the clause:
"However, if you publish or distribute your modifications without
contemporaneously requiring users to enter into a separate written license
agreement, then you are deemed to have granted all Members and all
Copyright Holders of
Hi Thorsten,
I mentioned Martin Ankerl in d/copyright, see
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/vecgeom/-/blob/2ffd0089931e788718c54126af67f34bff2eeff5/debian/copyright#L21-L23
Can you please double check?
Regards,
Stephan
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 8:00 PM Thorsten Alteholz
wrote:
>
>
> Hi
er
documentation, if the word "documentation" applies at all. Additionally a
patch is not part of the modified software itself . Again the sentence "If
that is where third-party acknowledgments normally appear, this
acknowledgment must be reproduced in the modified version of this software
Hi Thorsten,
On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 1:55 PM Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> On 08.01.22 09:46, Stephan Lachnit wrote:
> >
> > If I modify and publish GPL licensed software, I also need to license
> > these changes under the GPL.
>
> no, you can publish your patch unde
Hi Thorsten,
I'm not convinced this is the case.
>From 4.:
> [...] However, if you publish or distribute your modifications without
contemporaneously requiring users to enter into a separate written license
agreement, then you are deemed to have granted all Members and all
Copyright Holders of
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/jrmadsen/PTL/issues/25
Hi Lukas,
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 15:39:18 +0100 =?utf-8?q?Lukas_M=C3=A4rdian?=
wrote:
> I can observe the same issue with 2.3.0-1 on Ubuntu and filed an upstream bug
> at https://github.com/jrmadsen/PTL/issues/25
>
> The intmax_t
