On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 09:01:59AM +0200, Physicman wrote:
Hi,
I've also encountered this problem when running a ps after recompiling a
brand new kernel. Apparently, ps (and probably other applications) try
to fetch the System.map in / so if you just symlink it to the new
System.map
Goodday ladies and fellas
I have potato installed on a box that will be a proxy and firewall. I needed
to have the facility of port forwarding so i was told to install kernel 2.4.
I have the source downloaded and am busy going though the documentation but
some
of the packages that the
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Craig wrote:
I have the source downloaded and am busy going though the
documentation but some of the packages that the documentation makes
reference to is to low a version.
You don't need to install a full woody system to run a 2.4.x kernel. I
administer a large number
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:48:22AM +0200, Craig wrote:
Now what i need to know, is woody stable enough for a proxy/firewall machine
I do not know the answer to this as I haven't really used woody yet.
But, the stuff you need to make it work smoothly on a potato box can be
found starting from
Title: RE: Kernel 2.4 SOS
Now what i need to know, is woody stable enough for a
proxy/firewall machine
Just take the packages you need to run 2.4-kernel from woody and continue use potato.
That's what i do, works perfect.
And no, i wouldn't use woody on a firewall, it's to many
Hi Craig,
Now what i need to know, is woody stable enough for a proxy/firewall machine
...no prob at all, woody is nearly stable and i use it since half a year
without any probs as a firewall/squid-proxy and as a productive system
(intranet-server) for 20 users. for sure these are two
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:01:10AM +0200, Johan Segernäs wrote:
And no, i wouldn't use woody on a firewall, it's to many packet-updates all
the time, takes
to much time to keep track of everything imho.
woody also does not get security updates, in fact it can take a very
long time for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
as Giacomo already mailed, you have the possibility to use Adrian's
packages from people.debian.org/~bunk/debian. But I had several
problems with them using isdn and proxy, etc.
I have woody installed on my router/firewall/proxy/fax-server.
Ethan Benson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:01:10AM +0200, Johan Segernäs wrote:
And no, i wouldn't use woody on a firewall, it's to many packet-updates all
the time, takes
to much time to keep track of everything imho.
woody also does not get security updates, in fact it can take
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 12:21:44PM +0200, Joris Mocka wrote:
...this is a thing where i can't agree, in the last 6 month, all
security-fixes were as soon implemented as in potato (i have both, so
i'd compared). e.g. bind probs, man-db probs for mention a few. but i
have also the
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 07:11:00PM +0100, Tim Haynes wrote:
Stefan Srdic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyway, as you can guess I am using netfilter for firewalling.
How can I pipe all logs from Netfilter into a single logfile?
Lets say I wanted all log messages from netfilter to be
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 12:21:44PM +0200, Joris Mocka wrote:
Ethan Benson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:01:10AM +0200, Johan Segernäs wrote:
And no, i wouldn't use woody on a firewall, it's to many packet-updates all
the time, takes
to much time to keep track of everything
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:35:29AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 08:52:24PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the security link?
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ stable/updates main contrib
note that says stable. there is no security link for
Craig wrote:
Goodday ladies and fellas
I have potato installed on a box that will be a proxy and firewall. I needed
to have the facility of port forwarding so i was told to install kernel 2.4.
Does kernel 2.4 have some special feature of port forwarding that the
2.2.x kernels don't
Miquel Mart?n L?pez escribió:
Hi all!
We have several vt-100 terminal that log to the naub server at our office.
Still, some users without account in the main server would like to login to
another machine, so I was planning on creating a passwordless acount with a
shell that's a program
Tim, good fixups, a few C coding/style nitpicks:
On 12-Jun-01, 17:57 (CDT), Tim van Erven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#include stdio.h
#include unistd.h /* For execlp */
#include stdlib.h /* For exit */
int main()
int main(void) /* () != (void) in C */
{
charname[21]; /* Should
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:57:08AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
Tim, good fixups, a few C coding/style nitpicks:
On 12-Jun-01, 17:57 (CDT), Tim van Erven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#include stdio.h
#include unistd.h /* For execlp */
#include stdlib.h /* For exit */
int main()
int
Thanks for the feedback, I'll respond to both your replies at once.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 08:24:32PM +0400, Daniel Ginsburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:57:08AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
Tim, good fixups, a few C coding/style nitpicks:
On 12-Jun-01, 17:57
On 13-Jun-01, 11:24 (CDT), Daniel Ginsburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if(name[strlen(name) - 1] != '\n') {
Possible access to unallocated memory if \0\n supplied as input.
Oops, didn't catch that one.
/* return 0; */
exit(EXIT_SUCCESS); /* return doesn't call atexit()
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 02:02:10PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
[snip]
I'd still argue that exit(_macro_) is better style than return from
main(), but I'm hard pressed to find a technical argument.
There's subtle difference between returning from main and calling exit.
Excelent explanation
Whoa! Amazing :) This is exactly the sort of feedback I expected, thanks a
lot guys! I don't have trouble understanding your suggersions, my main
delight comes from wondering how on earth can you think of so many tiny
details :) And I thought I was paraonid :)
Really, thanks a lot, that taught me
On 13-Jun-01, 13:47 (CDT), Tim van Erven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:57:08AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
int main()
int main(void) /* () != (void) in C */
The comp.lang.c faq (http://www.faqs.org/faqs/C-faq/faq/) says it's ok.
Where does it say this?
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:10:27PM -0500, Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13-Jun-01, 13:47 (CDT), Tim van Erven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:57:08AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
int main()
int main(void) /* () != (void) in C */
The
Hi,
I have been using reiserfs on top of an encrypted filesystem (serpent) for a
couple of months with no problems until last night when the reiserfs crashed.
This brings me to my question. Is it possible to burn this filesystem onto a
CDR.
I have tried unsuccessfully both by using the
Hi,
I've also encountered this problem when running a ps after recompiling a
brand new kernel. Apparently, ps (and probably other applications) try
to fetch the System.map in / so if you just symlink it to the new
System.map file it should solve the issue.
Regards,
Chris
Alexander
Goodday ladies and fellas
I have potato installed on a box that will be a proxy and firewall. I needed
to have the facility of port forwarding so i was told to install kernel 2.4.
I have the source downloaded and am busy going though the documentation but
some
of the packages that the
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Craig wrote:
I have the source downloaded and am busy going though the
documentation but some of the packages that the documentation makes
reference to is to low a version.
You don't need to install a full woody system to run a 2.4.x kernel. I
administer a large number of
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:48:22AM +0200, Craig wrote:
Now what i need to know, is woody stable enough for a proxy/firewall machine
I do not know the answer to this as I haven't really used woody yet.
But, the stuff you need to make it work smoothly on a potato box can be
found starting from
Title: RE: Kernel 2.4 SOS
Now what i need to know, is woody stable enough for a
proxy/firewall machine
Just take the packages you need to run 2.4-kernel from woody and continue use potato.
That's what i do, works perfect.
And no, i wouldn't use woody on a firewall, it's to many
Hi Craig,
Now what i need to know, is woody stable enough for a proxy/firewall machine
...no prob at all, woody is nearly stable and i use it since half a year
without any probs as a firewall/squid-proxy and as a productive system
(intranet-server) for 20 users. for sure these are two different
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:01:10AM +0200, Johan Segernäs wrote:
And no, i wouldn't use woody on a firewall, it's to many packet-updates all
the time, takes
to much time to keep track of everything imho.
woody also does not get security updates, in fact it can take a very
long time for security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
as Giacomo already mailed, you have the possibility to use Adrian's
packages from people.debian.org/~bunk/debian. But I had several
problems with them using isdn and proxy, etc.
I have woody installed on my router/firewall/proxy/fax-server.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 07:11:00PM +0100, Tim Haynes wrote:
Stefan Srdic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyway, as you can guess I am using netfilter for firewalling.
How can I pipe all logs from Netfilter into a single logfile?
Lets say I wanted all log messages from netfilter to be
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 12:21:44PM +0200, Joris Mocka wrote:
Ethan Benson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:01:10AM +0200, Johan Segernäs wrote:
And no, i wouldn't use woody on a firewall, it's to many packet-updates
all
the time, takes
to much time to keep track of everything
Ethan Benson wrote:
security.debian.org is only for stable, it won't work on woody or
unstable since they almost invariably have newer versions then what
goes in security.debian.org. the fact you have so far seen good
results with security is mostly chance. if a security fix has some
Craig wrote:
Goodday ladies and fellas
I have potato installed on a box that will be a proxy and firewall. I needed
to have the facility of port forwarding so i was told to install kernel 2.4.
Does kernel 2.4 have some special feature of port forwarding that the
2.2.x kernels don't
Tim, good fixups, a few C coding/style nitpicks:
On 12-Jun-01, 17:57 (CDT), Tim van Erven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#include stdio.h
#include unistd.h /* For execlp */
#include stdlib.h /* For exit */
int main()
int main(void) /* () != (void) in C */
{
charname[21]; /* Should
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:57:08AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
Tim, good fixups, a few C coding/style nitpicks:
On 12-Jun-01, 17:57 (CDT), Tim van Erven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#include stdio.h
#include unistd.h /* For execlp */
#include stdlib.h /* For exit */
int main()
int
Thanks for the feedback, I'll respond to both your replies at once.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 08:24:32PM +0400, Daniel Ginsburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:57:08AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
Tim, good fixups, a few C coding/style nitpicks:
On 12-Jun-01, 17:57
On 13-Jun-01, 11:24 (CDT), Daniel Ginsburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if(name[strlen(name) - 1] != '\n') {
Possible access to unallocated memory if \0\n supplied as input.
Oops, didn't catch that one.
/* return 0; */
exit(EXIT_SUCCESS); /* return doesn't call atexit()
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 02:02:10PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
[snip]
I'd still argue that exit(_macro_) is better style than return from
main(), but I'm hard pressed to find a technical argument.
There's subtle difference between returning from main and calling exit.
Excelent explanation
Whoa! Amazing :) This is exactly the sort of feedback I expected, thanks a
lot guys! I don't have trouble understanding your suggersions, my main
delight comes from wondering how on earth can you think of so many tiny
details :) And I thought I was paraonid :)
Really, thanks a lot, that taught me
On 13-Jun-01, 13:47 (CDT), Tim van Erven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:57:08AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
int main()
int main(void) /* () != (void) in C */
The comp.lang.c faq (http://www.faqs.org/faqs/C-faq/faq/) says it's ok.
Where does it say this?
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:10:27PM -0500, Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 13-Jun-01, 13:47 (CDT), Tim van Erven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:57:08AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
int main()
int main(void) /* () != (void) in C */
The
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:10:27PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 13-Jun-01, 13:47 (CDT), Tim van Erven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:57:08AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
int main()
int main(void) /* () != (void) in C */
The comp.lang.c faq
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:34:28PM +0200, Tim van Erven wrote:
[snip]
Possible access to unallocated memory if \0\n supplied as input.
Only if strlen(name) = 0 and besides from being hard to achieve when
entering data on stdin, fgets will return 0 if that happens.
But not if
46 matches
Mail list logo
