On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 04:59:28PM -0500, JonesMB wrote:
Is it possible to get rid of the MAC address and the field that follows
it. All I would like to see is the source and destination IP address and
the information after it. I haven't been able to find any info on the net
on how to do
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for a
system running woody, that includes the security updates?
Woody would be my last choice for a automagically secure installation:
* it gets no packages of any
Mike Renfro, 2001-Aug-21 14:40 -0500:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for a
system running woody, that includes the security updates?
Woody would be my last choice for a automagically secure
I think this is an 800 year old Red Hat exploit, so probably no worries.
No need to worry, but any rpc services are lousy to have running anyway.
- k
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:28 PM
Subject:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 01:28:24PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
I've gotten logs several times that read something like
Aug 20 19:20:24 adsl-63-193-247-253 rpc.statd[330]: gethostbyname error for ^X
F7FFBF^XF7FFBF^YF7FFBF^YF7FFBF^ZF7FFBF^ZF7FF
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for
a system running woody, that includes the security updates? I
recently did an apt-get update apt-get upgrade and the
security updates cause dependancy
On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 04:59:28PM -0500, JonesMB wrote:
Is it possible to get rid of the MAC address and the field that follows
it. All I would like to see is the source and destination IP address and
the information after it. I haven't been able to find any info on the net
on how to do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am in the process of designing a Tripwire 2.3 policy file that is based
on the FHS plus annexes for GNU/Linux and Debian's distribution of it. I
don't like the current policy file which is just a list of all of the
Debian Important-level package
Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for
a system running woody, that includes the security updates? I
recently did an apt-get update apt-get upgrade and the
security updates cause dependancy issues that I couldn't
recover from and made my system unbootable,
* Jeff Coppock [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake thus:
Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for
a system running woody, that includes the security updates? I
recently did an apt-get update apt-get upgrade and the
security updates cause dependancy issues that I
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for a
system running woody, that includes the security updates?
Woody would be my last choice for a automagically secure installation:
* it gets no packages of any
Mike Renfro, 2001-Aug-21 14:40 -0500:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for a
system running woody, that includes the security updates?
Woody would be my last choice for a automagically secure
I've gotten logs several times that read something like
Aug 20 19:20:24 adsl-63-193-247-253 rpc.statd[330]: gethostbyname error for ^X
F7FFBF^XF7FFBF^YF7FFBF^YF7FFBF^ZF7FFBF^ZF7FF
BF^[F7FFBF^[F7FFBF%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%236x%n%137x%n%10x%n%
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff == Jeff Coppock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JeffI feel a bit stuck with woody though, since I want to use
Jeff iptables instead of ipchains. I think I'll remove the security
Jeff source until I figure out a better way.
Adrian Bunk has all
At 01:24 PM 8/21/2001 -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
Mike Renfro, 2001-Aug-21 14:40 -0500:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for a
system running woody, that includes the security updates?
Woody
Greetings,
A better solution might be to install Potato, then recompile the src debs from
woody for the few packages that you actually need.
G'day,
sjames
Quoting Jeff Coppock [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mike Renfro, 2001-Aug-21 14:40 -0500:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppock
I think this is an 800 year old Red Hat exploit, so probably no worries.
No need to worry, but any rpc services are lousy to have running anyway.
- k
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:28 PM
I'm using proftpd 1.2.0pre10-2.0potato1, tried this vulnerability, and still
affects to this version of proftpd.
I see that ftp://ftp.debian.org is still using this version, and I think also
affected.
Thanks
Didit
--- Start of forwarded message ---
From: Enrico Kern [EMAIL
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 01:28:24PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
I've gotten logs several times that read something like
Aug 20 19:20:24 adsl-63-193-247-253 rpc.statd[330]: gethostbyname error for ^X
F7FFBF^XF7FFBF^YF7FFBF^YF7FFBF^ZF7FFBF^ZF7FF
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for
a system running woody, that includes the security updates? I
recently did an apt-get update apt-get upgrade and the
security updates cause dependancy
20 matches
Mail list logo
