Hi!
Take a look at /etc/inetd.conf. There are some services you
are looking for. Try to comment thoose services and make a restart of
the inetd daemon. (Something as `/etc/init.d/inetd stop`
`/etc/init.d/inetd start')
Bye
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hi, when I make nmap I read my open ports more one suspect (every
time is one new port). So I make nmap another time and I read my
realy open ports without the last.
I saw this, too. That nmap version (at least the one from Potato)
seems to be buggy. To verify that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
also netstat -n -p -t --listening | grep :PORT
VD Hi,
VD On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 09:22:57PM -0700,
VD tony mancill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 20 Oct 2001, Marc Wilson wrote:
Adding or removing lines in /etc/services doesn't open or close
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 05:47:11PM +0200,
Petre Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also netstat -n -p -t --listening | grep :PORT
sure, but it shows you only tcp connections.
regards,
Volker
VD You can also use netstat -pan to find out which process is listening on
VD which port.
--
thanks for your explanation.
regards,
Volker
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 10:45:28AM -0500,
Craig McPherson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't believe nobody has answered this correctly yet. UDP is
different than TCP in that it is a stateless protocol, and that means
you have to understand a
Scott Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just out of curiosity, but isnt this comercicial spam and subject to
Debian's Spam policy... I dont know.. maybe debian should go to collect its
money from this person.
It's not commercial, for the simple reason that it's a serious crime.
If they're
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Q: Is a requirement being a Debian developer?
No. It is my understanding that it would be good to have fresh
blood in the team. Working on security can cost a lot of time,
thus it could even be helpful not being a Debian developer since
Wow! Craig...you are the MAN! This explains a number of other
questions I had too. Thank you very much!
jc
Craig McPherson, 2001-Oct-21 10:45 -0500:
I can't believe nobody has answered this correctly yet. UDP is
different than TCP in that it is a stateless protocol, and that means
you
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 03:26:18PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 06:06:34PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has debian released a new ssh dpkg yet?
no
If this is about the buffer overflow exploit that's supposed to be
going around now, wasn't this fixed in the
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 09:23:03AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Q: Is a requirement being a Debian developer?
No. It is my understanding that it would be good to have fresh
blood in the team. Working on security can cost a lot of
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 09:23:03AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Q: Is a requirement being a Debian developer?
No. It is my understanding that it would be good to have fresh
blood
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 04:41:17PM -0500, Mike Renfro wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 03:26:18PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 06:06:34PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has debian released a new ssh dpkg yet?
no
If this is about the buffer overflow exploit
Excuse your arrogance, but let me correct you in some points you made!
First of all nmap does not scan only the services listed in /etc/services, if
you were to have bothered reading the manual before answering you would have
read, and I quote:
The default is to scan all ports between 1
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 09:49:02AM -0600, orly-fu wrote:
First of all nmap does not scan only the services listed in /etc/services, if
you were to have bothered reading the manual before answering you would have
read, and I quote:
The default is to scan all ports between 1 and 1024
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 07:18:25PM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
Just for grins, I removed every udp listing in
/etc/services and restarted inetd and the scan came back the
same. I figure this is normal, but if someone can confirm this
behaviour, I'd really appreciate it.
Adding or removing
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 09:22:57PM -0700, tony mancill blathered thusly:
A good way to find out what process is listening on a port is to load the
lsof package and use lsof -i (as root so that you'll see everything).
I find that fuser is more convenient at times - fuser -v -n udp port
returns
tony mancill, 2001-Oct-20 21:22 -0700:
On Sat, 20 Oct 2001, Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 07:18:25PM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
Just for grins, I removed every udp listing in
/etc/services and restarted inetd and the scan came back the
same. I figure this is normal, but
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 09:22:57PM -0700,
tony mancill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 20 Oct 2001, Marc Wilson wrote:
Adding or removing lines in /etc/services doesn't open or close ports...
this is a common misconception. Removing what's listening on a particular
port is what
Hi!
Take a look at /etc/inetd.conf. There are some services you
are looking for. Try to comment thoose services and make a restart of
the inetd daemon. (Something as `/etc/init.d/inetd stop`
`/etc/init.d/inetd start')
Bye
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hi, when I make nmap I read my open ports more one suspect (every
time is one new port). So I make nmap another time and I read my
realy open ports without the last.
I saw this, too. That nmap version (at least the one from Potato)
seems to be buggy. To verify that I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
well,first you gotta chill..:
do you have a lan there? is your debian a gateway/router for the lan?
maybe you use a masquerade for some of those computers..
there can be an aplication in windows that connects through that port
to the internet.
so like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
also netstat -n -p -t --listening | grep :PORT
VD Hi,
VD On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 09:22:57PM -0700,
VD tony mancill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 20 Oct 2001, Marc Wilson wrote:
Adding or removing lines in /etc/services doesn't open or close
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 05:47:11PM +0200,
Petre Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also netstat -n -p -t --listening | grep :PORT
sure, but it shows you only tcp connections.
regards,
Volker
VD You can also use netstat -pan to find out which process is listening on
VD which port.
--
I can't believe nobody has answered this correctly yet. UDP is
different than TCP in that it is a stateless protocol, and that means
you have to understand a few things to interpret UDP port scan results
correctly. With TCP scans, you get one of three results: OPEN
(meaning that the TCP
thanks for your explanation.
regards,
Volker
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 10:45:28AM -0500,
Craig McPherson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't believe nobody has answered this correctly yet. UDP is
different than TCP in that it is a stateless protocol, and that means
you have to understand a few
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Q: Is a requirement being a Debian developer?
No. It is my understanding that it would be good to have fresh
blood in the team. Working on security can cost a lot of time,
thus it could even be helpful not being a Debian developer since
Scott Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just out of curiosity, but isnt this comercicial spam and subject to
Debian's Spam policy... I dont know.. maybe debian should go to collect its
money from this person.
It's not commercial, for the simple reason that it's a serious crime.
If they're
Wow! Craig...you are the MAN! This explains a number of other
questions I had too. Thank you very much!
jc
Craig McPherson, 2001-Oct-21 10:45 -0500:
I can't believe nobody has answered this correctly yet. UDP is
different than TCP in that it is a stateless protocol, and that means
you
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 03:26:18PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 06:06:34PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has debian released a new ssh dpkg yet?
no
If this is about the buffer overflow exploit that's supposed to be
going around now, wasn't this fixed in the
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 09:23:03AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Q: Is a requirement being a Debian developer?
No. It is my understanding that it would be good to have fresh
blood in the team. Working on security can cost a lot of
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 09:23:03AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Q: Is a requirement being a Debian developer?
No. It is my understanding that it would be good to have fresh
blood in
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 04:41:17PM -0500, Mike Renfro wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 03:26:18PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 06:06:34PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has debian released a new ssh dpkg yet?
no
If this is about the buffer overflow exploit that's
Excuse your arrogance, but let me correct you in some points you made!
First of all nmap does not scan only the services listed in /etc/services, if
you were to have bothered reading the manual before answering you would have
read, and I quote:
The default is to scan all ports between 1
Are they both around 20 years of age and steaming hot ? - like the ones we
all hope wish we had as receptionists in our corps ? =)
-xbud
On Sunday 21 October 2001 04:52 pm, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 09:23:03AM -0700, Thomas
34 matches
Mail list logo
