On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 04:27:53AM -0700, Jeff wrote:
dafr, 2002-May-03 10:52 -0700:
Jeff,
I had this problem initially as well when I reconfigured snort, until I
restarted the service. Quite obvious in retrospect, but when I missed
it initially, I could see others doing the same.
Hello ,
I've got 750k of this log daily
May 15 03:40:01 sm-msp-queue[16123]: STARTTLS=client, error: load verify locs
/etc/ssl/certs/, /etc/mail/ssl/sendmail-server.crt failed: 0
May 15 03:40:01 sm-msp-queue[16123]: STARTTLS=client, error: load verify locs
/etc/ssl/certs/,
On Thursday 16 May 2002 13:47, daniel mendoza wrote:
Hi Daniel,
May 15 03:50:01 sm-msp-queue[16143]: STARTTLS=client, error: load
verify locs /etc/ssl/certs/, /etc/mail/ssl/sendmail-server.crt failed: 0
what can it be?
create the SSL Certificates for sendmail or disable SSL/TLS Support
Hi !!
Then I was playing with sshd I had discovered
that it checks only 8 (first) characters
of my password, the remainder can be omitted ;)
Is it normal situation or my sshd
is configured incorrectly
(i use default configuration from package) ?
ssh -V shows:
OpenSSH_3.0.2p1 Debian
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 02:26:37PM +0200, Pawel Romanek wrote:
Then I was playing with sshd I had discovered
that it checks only 8 (first) characters
of my password, the remainder can be omitted ;)
That's normal for passwords using the standard unix crypt() function (like
aI24pyUVhurNU in
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 02:26:37PM +0200, Pawel Romanek wrote:
Hi !!
Then I was playing with sshd I had discovered
that it checks only 8 (first) characters
of my password, the remainder can be omitted ;)
[...]
Hi.
I suggest you look at your PAM settings (/etc/pam.d/ssh,
unsubscribe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Javier Fernández-Sanguino_Peña [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 04:27:53AM -0700, Jeff wrote:
dafr, 2002-May-03 10:52 -0700:
Jeff,
I had this problem initially as well when I reconfigured snort,
until I
restarted the service. Quite obvious in retrospect, but
How about group access privileges on the offending executables?
Seems to me to be the natural method of restricting access to stuff.
That is no good unless you restricket adding new binaries, or building
from source.
Gustavo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
It also depends if you've enabled MD5 passwords. If not, you
can only use up to 8 characters.
-Anne
This one time, Pawel Romanek wrote:
Hi !!
Then I was playing with sshd I had discovered
that it checks only 8 (first) characters
of my password, the remainder can be omitted ;)
Is it
unsubscribe
--
Juan Pablo Lopez P.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
El Camino de los excesos lleva al templo de la Sabiduria.
Jim Morrison
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
what this message means? is any allert?
May 16 14:53:29 server named[487]: lame server on '36.50.17.200.in-addr.arpa'
(in '50.17.200.in-addr.arpa'?): 200.17.50.35#53
tks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 04:27:53AM -0700, Jeff wrote:
dafr, 2002-May-03 10:52 -0700:
Jeff,
I had this problem initially as well when I reconfigured snort, until I
restarted the service. Quite obvious in retrospect, but when I missed
it initially, I could see others doing the same.
Hello ,
I've got 750k of this log daily
May 15 03:40:01 sm-msp-queue[16123]: STARTTLS=client, error: load verify
locs /etc/ssl/certs/, /etc/mail/ssl/sendmail-server.crt failed: 0
May 15 03:40:01 sm-msp-queue[16123]: STARTTLS=client, error: load verify
locs /etc/ssl/certs/,
On Thursday 16 May 2002 13:47, daniel mendoza wrote:
Hi Daniel,
May 15 03:50:01 sm-msp-queue[16143]: STARTTLS=client, error: load
verify locs /etc/ssl/certs/, /etc/mail/ssl/sendmail-server.crt failed: 0
what can it be?
create the SSL Certificates for sendmail or disable SSL/TLS Support
Hi !!
Then I was playing with sshd I had discovered
that it checks only 8 (first) characters
of my password, the remainder can be omitted ;)
Is it normal situation or my sshd
is configured incorrectly
(i use default configuration from package) ?
ssh -V shows:
OpenSSH_3.0.2p1 Debian
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 02:26:37PM +0200, Pawel Romanek wrote:
Hi !!
Then I was playing with sshd I had discovered
that it checks only 8 (first) characters
of my password, the remainder can be omitted ;)
[...]
Hi.
I suggest you look at your PAM settings (/etc/pam.d/ssh,
unsubscribe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Javier Fernández-Sanguino_Peña [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 04:27:53AM -0700, Jeff wrote:
dafr, 2002-May-03 10:52 -0700:
Jeff,
I had this problem initially as well when I reconfigured snort,
until I
restarted the service. Quite obvious in retrospect, but
How about group access privileges on the offending executables?
Seems to me to be the natural method of restricting access to stuff.
That is no good unless you restricket adding new binaries, or building
from source.
Gustavo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
It also depends if you've enabled MD5 passwords. If not, you
can only use up to 8 characters.
-Anne
This one time, Pawel Romanek wrote:
Hi !!
Then I was playing with sshd I had discovered
that it checks only 8 (first) characters
of my password, the remainder can be omitted ;)
Is it
unsubscribe
--
Juan Pablo Lopez P.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
El Camino de los excesos lleva al templo de la Sabiduria.
Jim Morrison
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
what this message means? is any allert?
May 16 14:53:29 server named[487]: lame server on '36.50.17.200.in-addr.arpa'
(in '50.17.200.in-addr.arpa'?): 200.17.50.35#53
tks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Extracted from the Bind FAQ:
A lame server is a server that does not believe is it
authoritative for a domain which has been delegated to
it. The lame server messages can be useful if you have
the lame server, or are a domain delegated to the lame
server. If you would rather not see the lame
26 matches
Mail list logo