Re: unsubscribe

2002-11-16 Thread Thorin Oakenshield
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 08:39:35AM +0100, Martin Godisch wrote: Why not :0: * ^Subject: unsubscribe * ^X-Mailing-List: debian-.*@lists\.debian\.org /dev/null instead? I don't like the idea that my system is deleting emails I have never seen. Once a month I find the time to

RE: unsubscribe

2002-11-16 Thread Thomas Horsten
On 15 Nov 2002, Yogesh Sharma wrote: I think debian list has to add some filter on subject and if subject contains unsubscribe redirect that email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or else we have add following message in multiple languages. To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

please do not ...

2002-11-16 Thread poczta
people, do not respond to 'unsubscribe' messages, 'cause from on mail it grows to many messages, so think twice before you mail on it. thanks ireo

Re: unsubscribe

2002-11-16 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 01:16:25PM -0600, Steve Waterman wrote: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] this really gets annoying. is the list owner willing and able to filter those dumb messages, and maybe bounce

Re: unsubscribe

2002-11-16 Thread Horst Pflugstaedt
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 06:46:25PM +0100, Thomas Horsten wrote: Are you thick or what? the last days it seems to me that those unsubscribe-messages more and more become a security-problem (health-risk) to the remaining members of this list... calm down, please. need some valium? :-)

Re: Debian Apache Packaging - Option 4!

2002-11-16 Thread Daniel Stone
[CC finally changed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], whoops. Please keep editors@, or just me]. On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 02:01:23PM -0800, Robert Woodcock scrawled: On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 04:25:22PM -0500, Robert C. wrote: The Apache suexec helper is special Is special the going euphamism for buggy?

Re: [OT] please do not ...

2002-11-16 Thread Rob VanFleet
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 11:55:49AM +0100, poczta wrote: people, do not respond to 'unsubscribe' messages, 'cause from on mail it grows to many messages, so think twice before you mail on it. thanks or at the very least, If you are bound and determined to address this person's erorr, reply to

Apache/suexec (was Re: Debian Apache Packaging - Option 4!)

2002-11-16 Thread Justin Ryan
Not really, it's a security file: you can't change your area without recompiling. I can see the use for this: h4x0rs can't just change a config file and have a completely different suexec area, of their own choosing. Of course, if they can get write access to said config file they probably

Re: unsubscribe

2002-11-16 Thread Thorin Oakenshield
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 10:38:45PM +0100, Martin Godisch wrote: On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 16:16:35 -0500, Phillip Hofmeister wrote: :0: * ^Subject: unsubscribe * ^X-Mailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/mail/probably-uninteresting Why not :0: * ^Subject: unsubscribe * ^X-Mailing-List: [EMAIL

Re: unsubscribe

2002-11-16 Thread Thorin Oakenshield
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 08:39:35AM +0100, Martin Godisch wrote: Why not :0: * ^Subject: unsubscribe * ^X-Mailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev/null instead? I don't like the idea that my system is deleting emails I have never seen. Once a month I find the time to check my spam

RE: unsubscribe

2002-11-16 Thread Thomas Horsten
On 15 Nov 2002, Yogesh Sharma wrote: I think debian list has to add some filter on subject and if subject contains unsubscribe redirect that email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or else we have add following message in multiple languages. To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

please do not ...

2002-11-16 Thread poczta
people, do not respond to 'unsubscribe' messages, 'cause from on mail it grows to many messages, so think twice before you mail on it. thanks ireo

Re: unsubscribe

2002-11-16 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 01:16:25PM -0600, Steve Waterman wrote: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] this really gets annoying. is the list owner willing and able to filter those dumb messages, and maybe bounce

Re: unsubscribe

2002-11-16 Thread Horst Pflugstaedt
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 06:46:25PM +0100, Thomas Horsten wrote: Are you thick or what? the last days it seems to me that those unsubscribe-messages more and more become a security-problem (health-risk) to the remaining members of this list... calm down, please. need some valium? :-)

Re: Debian Apache Packaging - Option 4!

2002-11-16 Thread Daniel Stone
[CC finally changed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], whoops. Please keep editors@, or just me]. On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 02:01:23PM -0800, Robert Woodcock scrawled: On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 04:25:22PM -0500, Robert C. wrote: The Apache suexec helper is special Is special the going euphamism for buggy?

Re: [OT] please do not ...

2002-11-16 Thread Rob VanFleet
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 11:55:49AM +0100, poczta wrote: people, do not respond to 'unsubscribe' messages, 'cause from on mail it grows to many messages, so think twice before you mail on it. thanks or at the very least, If you are bound and determined to address this person's erorr, reply to

Apache/suexec (was Re: Debian Apache Packaging - Option 4!)

2002-11-16 Thread Justin Ryan
Not really, it's a security file: you can't change your area without recompiling. I can see the use for this: h4x0rs can't just change a config file and have a completely different suexec area, of their own choosing. Of course, if they can get write access to said config file they probably