Re: File system integrity checkers - comparison?

2002-12-05 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:44:12PM -0800, Johannes Graumann wrote: and was wondering as to what this group is prefering and why or whether there are other more trusted alternatives. My main argument ageinst tripwire is it's pseudo-commercial source. I use tripwire and recommend it strongly.

Re: File system integrity checkers - comparison?

2002-12-05 Thread Rick Moen
Quoting Noah L. Meyerhans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): The only drawback to tripwire, IMHO, is that because it's written in C++, it may be difficult to get running on non-x86 systems. Presumably g++ 3.2 will help address that issue. When last I checked, it also lacks autoconf support. AIDE, by

Updating Snort Signatures In Stable ?

2002-12-05 Thread Nick Boyce
I've been running Snort for a month or so now on a Woody box at work, and am now wondering whether the Debian Project (or packager) has a Plan for providing signature file updates to users of the stable distribution. The snort-rules-default package available in stable never gets updated - nor

Re: Updating Snort Signatures In Stable ?

2002-12-05 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 04:18:52AM +, Nick Boyce wrote: I've been running Snort for a month or so now on a Woody box at work, and am now wondering whether the Debian Project (or packager) has a Plan for providing signature file updates to users of the stable distribution. This has been

NETSTAT: warning, got bogus TCP line

2002-12-05 Thread Poon Dawg
Hi everyone, not sure if this is a security issue. Sorry if it isnt. After doing a netstat I got a line 'warning, got bogus TCP line' from a client connecting to apache on a server I am looking after. Ive done a search on google without much success. Anyone know what this means? Thanks in

unsubscribe

2002-12-05 Thread Chandrashekhar B
unsubscribe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: File system integrity checkers - comparison?

2002-12-05 Thread Domonkos Czinke
Hi, I'm using integrit for a while and its working fine here. Fast, small memory usage and good reporting system. I'm using it with CODA (binary, config and databases are on the CODA server), and its working fine :) Cheers, Domonkos Czinke -Original Message- From: Johannes

Re: File system integrity checkers - comparison?

2002-12-05 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:44:12PM -0800, Johannes Graumann wrote: and was wondering as to what this group is prefering and why or whether there are other more trusted alternatives. My main argument ageinst tripwire is it's pseudo-commercial source. I use tripwire and recommend it strongly.

Re: File system integrity checkers - comparison?

2002-12-05 Thread Rick Moen
Quoting Noah L. Meyerhans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): The only drawback to tripwire, IMHO, is that because it's written in C++, it may be difficult to get running on non-x86 systems. Presumably g++ 3.2 will help address that issue. When last I checked, it also lacks autoconf support. AIDE, by

Updating Snort Signatures In Stable ?

2002-12-05 Thread Nick Boyce
I've been running Snort for a month or so now on a Woody box at work, and am now wondering whether the Debian Project (or packager) has a Plan for providing signature file updates to users of the stable distribution. The snort-rules-default package available in stable never gets updated - nor

Re: Updating Snort Signatures In Stable ?

2002-12-05 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 04:18:52AM +, Nick Boyce wrote: I've been running Snort for a month or so now on a Woody box at work, and am now wondering whether the Debian Project (or packager) has a Plan for providing signature file updates to users of the stable distribution. This has been