I'm planning to setup a VPN to bridge 2 networks over DSL as well as have
the ability to have people connect to the network from home. I wanted to
get an idea of what experiences that people had had and what packages
they've used. I have looked at FreeSwan but haven't set it up yet. I have
setup
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 22:05, Gene wrote:
> can you elaborate on your question, since you're using the box as a
> firewall, this particular service should be up first to ensure that your
> perimeter is in check.. also, if this is your gateway host, how else
> would you get your internal network
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 08:38:27AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 14:13:15 -0500,
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:07:11AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> > > The problem is that there is fakeroot. getuid() == 0 or
> > > geteuid() == 0 is no
I'm planning to setup a VPN to bridge 2 networks over DSL as well as have
the ability to have people connect to the network from home. I wanted to
get an idea of what experiences that people had had and what packages
they've used. I have looked at FreeSwan but haven't set it up yet. I have
setup
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 14:13:15 -0500,
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:07:11AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> > The problem is that there is fakeroot. getuid() == 0 or
> > geteuid() == 0 is not enough. PAM is an overkill.
> > I think seteuid(0) == 0 is the best ap
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 22:05, Gene wrote:
> can you elaborate on your question, since you're using the box as a
> firewall, this particular service should be up first to ensure that your
> perimeter is in check.. also, if this is your gateway host, how else
> would you get your internal network
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 08:38:27AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 14:13:15 -0500,
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:07:11AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> > > The problem is that there is fakeroot. getuid() == 0 or
> > > geteuid() == 0 is no
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 14:13:15 -0500,
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:07:11AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> > The problem is that there is fakeroot. getuid() == 0 or
> > geteuid() == 0 is not enough. PAM is an overkill.
> > I think seteuid(0) == 0 is the best ap
Hi !
I am using the firewall shorewall from stable branch (version 2.1.12) and I
want to migrate to testing branch (version 1.3.10 and 1.3.11).
Has anybody tested the migration from stable to testing branch ?
Are there any changes in the configuration files ?
Is the package stable for a productio
尊敬的阁下您好：
网络营销已担任企业商务的重要角色，大多数的国内
外企业已开始实施自己全面的网络营销计划，所以网络营
销工具成为企业通过互联网进行商务活动的必不可少部分。
大路网络营销全集汇集网络营销所具备的一切工具，真正
的帮助企业通过互联网全面开拓市场、寻求全球买家、
疯狂增加销售订单、树立企业形象、将企业广告投入缩减
为零。
详情请点击访问：http://www.yuefeng2000.com/index-e.htm
访问我们的站点：http://www.yuefeng2000.com
购买24小时咨询电话：025-2207744，2210862
Hi !
I am using the firewall shorewall from stable branch (version 2.1.12) and I
want to migrate to testing branch (version 1.3.10 and 1.3.11).
Has anybody tested the migration from stable to testing branch ?
Are there any changes in the configuration files ?
Is the package stable for a productio
×𾴵ĸóÏÂÄúºÃ£º
ÍøÂçÓªÏúÒѵ£ÈÎÆóÒµÉÌÎñµÄÖØÒª½ÇÉ«£¬´ó¶àÊýµÄ¹úÄÚ
ÍâÆóÒµÒÑ¿ªÊ¼ÊµÊ©×Ô¼ºÈ«ÃæµÄÍøÂçÓªÏú¼Æ»®£¬ËùÒÔÍøÂçÓª
Ïú¹¤¾ß³ÉΪÆóҵͨ¹ý»¥ÁªÍø½øÐÐÉÌÎñ»î¶¯µÄ±Ø²»¿ÉÉÙ²¿·Ö¡£
´ó·ÍøÂçÓªÏúÈ«¼¯»ã¼¯ÍøÂçÓªÏúËù¾ß±¸µÄÒ»Çй¤¾ß£¬ÕæÕý
µÄ°ïÖúÆóҵͨ¹ý»¥ÁªÍøÈ«Ã濪ÍØÊг¡¡¢Ñ°ÇóÈ«ÇòÂò¼Ò¡¢
·è¿ñÔö¼ÓÏúÊÛ¶©µ¥¡¢Ê÷Á¢ÆóÒµ
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:07:11AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> The problem is that there is fakeroot. getuid() == 0 or
> geteuid() == 0 is not enough. PAM is an overkill.
> I think seteuid(0) == 0 is the best approach.
fakeroot (or any other dynamic linker tricks) will not work on set[ug]id
pro
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 01:43:48AM +, Nick Boyce wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:52:06 -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> [re: installing the snort binary from unstable]
>
> >... And I prefer not to install unstable glibc on my stable systems.
>
> Yeah - I thought there was a big problem with
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:07:11AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> The problem is that there is fakeroot. getuid() == 0 or
> geteuid() == 0 is not enough. PAM is an overkill.
> I think seteuid(0) == 0 is the best approach.
fakeroot (or any other dynamic linker tricks) will not work on set[ug]id
pro
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 01:43:48AM +, Nick Boyce wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:52:06 -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> [re: installing the snort binary from unstable]
>
> >... And I prefer not to install unstable glibc on my stable systems.
>
> Yeah - I thought there was a big problem with
Well what happened is I secrued up and sent it to just Oohara and not to
the list. Well I tried but sent it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So that not working I opened it out of my sent items and just forwarded
it to the list but the singing got screwed up.
Chirs
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 06:14, Adrian 'Dagura
Well what happened is I secrued up and sent it to just Oohara and not to
the list. Well I tried but sent it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So that not working I opened it out of my sent items and just forwarded
it to the list but the singing got screwed up.
Chirs
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 06:14, Adrian 'Dagura
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 09:57:13AM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 16:52, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:36:08PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> >
> > > No, you can't rebuild snort version from unstable.
> >
> > Who can't? You can't? I just did, and it
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 16:52, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:36:08PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
>
> > No, you can't rebuild snort version from unstable.
>
> Who can't? You can't? I just did, and it was not only possible, but easy.
Nick Boyce!
> apt-get build-dep snort &&
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 09:57:13AM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 16:52, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:36:08PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> >
> > > No, you can't rebuild snort version from unstable.
> >
> > Who can't? You can't? I just did, and it
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 03:58, Chris Shafer wrote:
> Hello,
> Some documentation I found helpful when I was doing something similar in
[...]
Just wondering...
Content-Type: multipart/mixed instead of multipart/signed. Your mailer
buggy?
cheers
-- vbi
--
featured link: http://fortytwo.ch/smtp
s
Martin Fluch:
> I've recently compiled pine 4.5 on my woody system and when I use it, I
> get every time the notification:
>
> "Folder vulnerable - directory /var/spool/mail must have 1777 protection"
>
> /var/spool/mail is a link to /var/mail, wich has the permissions:
>
>drwxrwsr-x2 root
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 16:52, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:36:08PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
>
> > No, you can't rebuild snort version from unstable.
>
> Who can't? You can't? I just did, and it was not only possible, but easy.
Nick Boyce!
> apt-get build-dep snort &&
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:07:11AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> I am working on adding a high score list to a game written in C.
> (It's already packaged.) The high score list will be 664 root:games
> and the game binary will be sgid games --- nothing special here.
> I want to dump and undump the
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 03:58, Chris Shafer wrote:
> Hello,
> Some documentation I found helpful when I was doing something similar in
[...]
Just wondering...
Content-Type: multipart/mixed instead of multipart/signed. Your mailer
buggy?
cheers
-- vbi
--
featured link: http://fortytwo.ch/smtp
Martin Fluch:
> I've recently compiled pine 4.5 on my woody system and when I use it, I
> get every time the notification:
>
> "Folder vulnerable - directory /var/spool/mail must have 1777 protection"
>
> /var/spool/mail is a link to /var/mail, wich has the permissions:
>
>drwxrwsr-x2 root
Hello!
I've recently compiled pine 4.5 on my woody system and when I use it, I
get every time the notification:
"Folder vulnerable - directory /var/spool/mail must have 1777 protection"
/var/spool/mail is a link to /var/mail, wich has the permissions:
drwxrwsr-x2 root mail 1
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:07:11AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> I am working on adding a high score list to a game written in C.
> (It's already packaged.) The high score list will be 664 root:games
> and the game binary will be sgid games --- nothing special here.
> I want to dump and undump the
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 16:37, Kuba Jakubik wrote:
> Yogesh Sharma wrote:
> > In my opinion shorewall must be started as soon as network is up.
> can't you just mv S90shorewall S35shorewall ?
Yes, I can move this link but question is for security. In my opinion
this should be fixed in package install
30 matches
Mail list logo
