[SECURITY] [DSA 208-1] New Perl packages correct Safe handling

2002-12-12 Thread Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -- Debian Security Advisory DSA 208-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze December 12th, 2002

Re: VPN + Roadwarrior

2002-12-12 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Noah L. Meyerhans [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002.12.12.1656 +0100]: On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 09:39:27AM -0500, Phillip Hofmeister wrote: If you implement IPSec, my experience (as of 6 months ago) with IPSec is that it works great, as long as you use the same implementation on all host.

Re: init.d startup sequence for shorewall

2002-12-12 Thread Jeremy A. Puhlman
- Original Message - From: Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 12:55 PM Subject: Re: init.d startup sequence for shorewall On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 05:39:37PM -0800, Yogesh Sharma wrote: networking comes up at S35 in runlevel 0

Re: init.d startup sequence for shorewall

2002-12-12 Thread Raymond Wood
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 03:55:56PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman remarked: On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 05:39:37PM -0800, Yogesh Sharma wrote: networking comes up at S35 in runlevel 0 so my internet is up and there is no firewall running so far. runlevel 0 is system shutdown and halt. The network is

Re: init.d startup sequence for shorewall

2002-12-12 Thread Yogesh Sharma
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 12:55, Matt Zimmerman wrote: On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 05:39:37PM -0800, Yogesh Sharma wrote: networking comes up at S35 in runlevel 0 so my internet is up and there is no firewall running so far. runlevel 0 is system shutdown and halt. The network is not brought up

Re: init.d startup sequence for shorewall

2002-12-12 Thread Daniel Swärd
networking comes up at S35 in runlevel 0 so my internet is up and there is no firewall running so far. runlevel 0 is system shutdown and halt. The network is not brought up in this runlevel. :-) Actually that seems to be a highly secure firewall...Firewalls with no power cannot

Apologies re: VPN + Roadwarrior

2002-12-12 Thread Jeffrey Taylor
Sorry for the multiple sends. Some of the original addresses had typos that I corrected and resent. Bad dog! Apologies, Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: VPN + Roadwarrior

2002-12-12 Thread Jeffrey Taylor
From Building Linux VPNs, FreeS/WAN has some basic interoperability with: KAME: FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, BSDi PGPnet Windows 2000 F-Secure VPN IRE Safenet/SoftPK SSH IPSec Express Gauntlet GVPN Xedia's AccessPoint QVPN Checkpoint SecuRemote VPN-1/Firewall-2 Raptor Firewall, Raptor MobileNT T

Re: init.d startup sequence for shorewall

2002-12-12 Thread Mitch Thompson
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 15:07, Jeremy A. Puhlman wrote: - Original Message - From: Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 12:55 PM Subject: Re: init.d startup sequence for shorewall On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 05:39:37PM -0800, Yogesh

Re: Apologies re: VPN + Roadwarrior

2002-12-12 Thread Lupe Christoph
On Thursday, 2002-12-12 at 13:02:41 -0600, Jeffrey Taylor wrote: Sorry for the multiple sends. Some of the original addresses had typos that I corrected and resent. Bad dog! Still no cookie, bad dog :-P http://ipsec.wit.antd.nist.gov/ Host does not resolve http://isakmp.test.ssh.fi/

Re: how to identify the superuser in C

2002-12-12 Thread Moritz Schulte
Oohara Yuuma [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: fakeroot (or any other dynamic linker tricks) will not work on set[ug]id programs. libc can be trusted here. Is this Linux specific? (There can be a Hurd port in the sarge release). Of course the same protection is present in GNU/Hurd. Btw: this

Re: VPN + Roadwarrior

2002-12-12 Thread Phillip Hofmeister
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 at 07:41:55PM -0700, Aaron Anderson wrote: I'm planning to setup a VPN to bridge 2 networks over DSL as well as have the ability to have people connect to the network from home. I wanted to get an idea of what experiences that people had had and what packages they've used.

Re: VPN + Roadwarrior

2002-12-12 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 09:39:27AM -0500, Phillip Hofmeister wrote: If you implement IPSec, my experience (as of 6 months ago) with IPSec is that it works great, as long as you use the same implementation on all host. I don't really agree with that. I have used several different IPsec

Re: VPN + Roadwarrior

2002-12-12 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Noah L. Meyerhans [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002.12.12.1656 +0100]: On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 09:39:27AM -0500, Phillip Hofmeister wrote: If you implement IPSec, my experience (as of 6 months ago) with IPSec is that it works great, as long as you use the same implementation on all host.

Re: VPN + Roadwarrior

2002-12-12 Thread Jeffrey Taylor
From Building Linux VPNs, FreeS/WAN has some basic interoperability with: KAME: FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, BSDi PGPnet Windows 2000 F-Secure VPN IRE Safenet/SoftPK SSH IPSec Express Gauntlet GVPN Xedia's AccessPoint QVPN Checkpoint SecuRemote VPN-1/Firewall-2 Raptor Firewall, Raptor MobileNT T

Re: VPN + Roadwarrior

2002-12-12 Thread Jeffrey Taylor
From Building Linux VPNs, FreeS/WAN has some basic interoperability with: KAME: FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, BSDi PGPnet Windows 2000 F-Secure VPN IRE Safenet/SoftPK SSH IPSec Express Gauntlet GVPN Xedia's AccessPoint QVPN Checkpoint SecuRemote VPN-1/Firewall-2 Raptor Firewall, Raptor MobileNT T

Re: VPN + Roadwarrior

2002-12-12 Thread Jeffrey Taylor
From Building Linux VPNs, FreeS/WAN has some basic interoperability with: KAME: FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, BSDi PGPnet Windows 2000 F-Secure VPN IRE Safenet/SoftPK SSH IPSec Express Gauntlet GVPN Xedia's AccessPoint QVPN Checkpoint SecuRemote VPN-1/Firewall-2 Raptor Firewall, Raptor MobileNT T

Re: VPN + Roadwarrior

2002-12-12 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Noah L. Meyerhans [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002.12.12.1656 +0100]: On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 09:39:27AM -0500, Phillip Hofmeister wrote: If you implement IPSec, my experience (as of 6 months ago) with IPSec is that it works great, as long as you use the same implementation on all host.

Apologies re: VPN + Roadwarrior

2002-12-12 Thread Jeffrey Taylor
Sorry for the multiple sends. Some of the original addresses had typos that I corrected and resent. Bad dog! Apologies, Jeff

Re: init.d startup sequence for shorewall

2002-12-12 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 05:39:37PM -0800, Yogesh Sharma wrote: networking comes up at S35 in runlevel 0 so my internet is up and there is no firewall running so far. runlevel 0 is system shutdown and halt. The network is not brought up in this runlevel. :-) -- - mdz

Re: init.d startup sequence for shorewall

2002-12-12 Thread Jeremy A. Puhlman
- Original Message - From: Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-security@lists.debian.org Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 12:55 PM Subject: Re: init.d startup sequence for shorewall On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 05:39:37PM -0800, Yogesh Sharma wrote: networking comes up at S35

Re: init.d startup sequence for shorewall

2002-12-12 Thread Raymond Wood
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 03:55:56PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman remarked: On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 05:39:37PM -0800, Yogesh Sharma wrote: networking comes up at S35 in runlevel 0 so my internet is up and there is no firewall running so far. runlevel 0 is system shutdown and halt. The network is

Re: init.d startup sequence for shorewall

2002-12-12 Thread Yogesh Sharma
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 12:55, Matt Zimmerman wrote: On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 05:39:37PM -0800, Yogesh Sharma wrote: networking comes up at S35 in runlevel 0 so my internet is up and there is no firewall running so far. runlevel 0 is system shutdown and halt. The network is not brought up

Re: init.d startup sequence for shorewall

2002-12-12 Thread Daniel Swärd
networking comes up at S35 in runlevel 0 so my internet is up and there is no firewall running so far. runlevel 0 is system shutdown and halt. The network is not brought up in this runlevel. :-) Actually that seems to be a highly secure firewall...Firewalls with no power

Bug#172835: shorewall should use update-rc.d

2002-12-12 Thread Matt Zimmerman
Package: shorewall Severity: normal On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 04:18:17PM -0500, Raymond Wood wrote: On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 03:55:56PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman remarked: On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 05:39:37PM -0800, Yogesh Sharma wrote: networking comes up at S35 in runlevel 0 so my internet is

Re: init.d startup sequence for shorewall

2002-12-12 Thread Mitch Thompson
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 15:07, Jeremy A. Puhlman wrote: - Original Message - From: Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-security@lists.debian.org Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 12:55 PM Subject: Re: init.d startup sequence for shorewall On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 05:39:37PM