A Windows-worm in the debian-security list? Great :D
BM - Original message follows -
BM Microsoft Consumer
BM this is the latest version of security update, the
BM June 2003, Cumulative Patch update which eliminates all
BM known security vulnerabilities affecting Internet Explorer,
BM
Hello all,
I am thinking about setting up an FTP server to be used by myself and a
couple of friends. The box it will be running on is basically stock
Woody, and is currently only running apache and NAT'ing for a LAN.
I'd like the FTP server to not allow anonymous logins (which I assume
most
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 12:56:01PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
I am thinking about setting up an FTP server to be used by myself and a
couple of friends. The box it will be running on is basically stock
Woody, and is currently only running apache and NAT'ing for a LAN.
I'd like the FTP
Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I see that proftpd is the example used in the 'securing Debian' manual,
but it doesn't appear to be able to use SSL. OTOH, ftpd-ssl doesn't
appear to do chroot'ing, at least not at a quick glance. Anybody know
of one that combines these features? I
Any recommendations, experiences, thoughts?
Running ftp over a vpn would work but its not the easiest option. Sftp is
exactly what you need. Why not just run it on another port?
Hope this helps.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: recommendations for FTP server
Date:Fri, 20 Jun 2003 18:37:43 +
If security is a concern, you might want to use SecureFTP instead. It is part of
the OpenSSH package. The sftp client is a part of most Linux
Stephen Gran sent the following message Today:
SG Hello all,
SG
SG I'd like the FTP server to not allow anonymous logins (which I assume
SG most can do), chroot users to their home directories, and have some sort
SG of encrypted connections (over SSL would be nice). I have thought about
SG
Have you thought about running sftp on a nonstandard port?
John Wright
Manager of Departmental Computing
Radio/TV Services
Indiana University
1229 E. Seventh Street, room 284
Radio-TV Center
Bloomington, Indiana 47405
Phone: 812-855-8076
Fax: 812-855-0729
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 18:56, Stephen Gran wrote:
Hello all,
I am thinking about setting up an FTP server to be used by myself and a
couple of friends. The box it will be running on is basically stock
Woody, and is currently only running apache and NAT'ing for a LAN.
I'd like the FTP
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 02:24:22PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 12:56:01PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
I am thinking about setting up an FTP server to be used by myself and a
couple of friends. The box it will be running on is basically stock
Woody, and is
This one time, at band camp, Matt Zimmerman said:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 12:56:01PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
I'd like the FTP server to not allow anonymous logins (which I assume
most can do), chroot users to their home directories, and have some sort
of encrypted connections (over SSL
* Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am thinking about setting up an FTP server to be used by myself and a
couple of friends. The box it will be running on is basically stock
Woody, and is currently only running apache and NAT'ing for a LAN.
I'd like the FTP server to not allow
Proftpd does support SSL/TLS. It's a module that comes with it, it's
just not enabled by default. Some nice docs here:
http://www.castaglia.org/proftpd/modules/mod_tls.html
http://www.castaglia.org/proftpd/doc/contrib/ProFTPD-mini-HOWTO-TLS.html
Actually... it's enabled by default, that's
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 07:39:28PM +0100, Ian Goodall wrote:
Any recommendations, experiences, thoughts?
Running ftp over a vpn would work but its not the easiest option. Sftp is
exactly what you need. Why not just run it on another port?
Last I checked, sftp requires a patch to chroot,
* Stephen Gran ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030621 01:05]:
Yeah, that's what I have been thinking. I was sort of hoping there was
something else out there that did all this besides sftp, because several
of my friends will be connecting from Windoze boxes. I guess I'll just
point them to PuTTy and
You could run sshd on another port. Really, if you want encryption and no
anonymous connections, sftp is the right tool for the job.
Yeah, that's what I have been thinking. I was sort of hoping there was
something else out there that did all this besides sftp, because several
of
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dariush Pietrzak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: recommendations for FTP server
Date:Sat, 21 Jun 2003 01:09:45 +
I know about SSL/TLS support in Proftp, the only problem is that few clients
support it (thanks fot the link to the Woody backport). I would
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 16:25:30 -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Matt Zimmerman said:
[...]
Yeah, that's what I have been thinking. I was sort of hoping there was
something else out there that did all this besides sftp, because several
of my friends will be connecting from
Quoting Marcus Frings ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Maybe http://www.linuxmafia.com/pub/linux/security/ftp-daemons will
help you to make a good decision.
Hey, thanks, Marcus!
That file reflects (and disclaims) my prejudice that anonymous ftp remains
A Good Thing (see:
A Windows-worm in the debian-security list? Great :D
BM - Original message follows -
BM Microsoft Consumer
BM this is the latest version of security update, the
BM June 2003, Cumulative Patch update which eliminates all
BM known security vulnerabilities affecting Internet Explorer,
BM
Hello all,
I am thinking about setting up an FTP server to be used by myself and a
couple of friends. The box it will be running on is basically stock
Woody, and is currently only running apache and NAT'ing for a LAN.
I'd like the FTP server to not allow anonymous logins (which I assume
most
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 12:56:01PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
I am thinking about setting up an FTP server to be used by myself and a
couple of friends. The box it will be running on is basically stock
Woody, and is currently only running apache and NAT'ing for a LAN.
I'd like the FTP
Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I see that proftpd is the example used in the 'securing Debian' manual,
but it doesn't appear to be able to use SSL. OTOH, ftpd-ssl doesn't
appear to do chroot'ing, at least not at a quick glance. Anybody know
of one that combines these features? I
Any recommendations, experiences, thoughts?
Running ftp over a vpn would work but its not the easiest option. Sftp is
exactly what you need. Why not just run it on another port?
Hope this helps.
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: recommendations for FTP server
Date:Fri, 20 Jun 2003 18:37:43 +
If security is a concern, you might want to use SecureFTP instead. It is part of
the OpenSSH package. The sftp client is a part of most Linux
Have you thought about running sftp on a nonstandard port?
John Wright
Manager of Departmental Computing
Radio/TV Services
Indiana University
1229 E. Seventh Street, room 284
Radio-TV Center
Bloomington, Indiana 47405
Phone: 812-855-8076
Fax: 812-855-0729
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 18:56, Stephen Gran wrote:
Hello all,
I am thinking about setting up an FTP server to be used by myself and a
couple of friends. The box it will be running on is basically stock
Woody, and is currently only running apache and NAT'ing for a LAN.
I'd like the FTP
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 02:24:22PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 12:56:01PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
I am thinking about setting up an FTP server to be used by myself and a
couple of friends. The box it will be running on is basically stock
Woody, and is
This one time, at band camp, Matt Zimmerman said:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 12:56:01PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
I'd like the FTP server to not allow anonymous logins (which I assume
most can do), chroot users to their home directories, and have some sort
of encrypted connections (over SSL
* Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am thinking about setting up an FTP server to be used by myself and a
couple of friends. The box it will be running on is basically stock
Woody, and is currently only running apache and NAT'ing for a LAN.
I'd like the FTP server to not allow
Proftpd does support SSL/TLS. It's a module that comes with it, it's
just not enabled by default. Some nice docs here:
http://www.castaglia.org/proftpd/modules/mod_tls.html
http://www.castaglia.org/proftpd/doc/contrib/ProFTPD-mini-HOWTO-TLS.html
Actually... it's enabled by default, that's
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 07:39:28PM +0100, Ian Goodall wrote:
Any recommendations, experiences, thoughts?
Running ftp over a vpn would work but its not the easiest option. Sftp is
exactly what you need. Why not just run it on another port?
Last I checked, sftp requires a patch to chroot,
* Stephen Gran ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030621 01:05]:
Yeah, that's what I have been thinking. I was sort of hoping there was
something else out there that did all this besides sftp, because several
of my friends will be connecting from Windoze boxes. I guess I'll just
point them to PuTTy and
You could run sshd on another port. Really, if you want encryption and no
anonymous connections, sftp is the right tool for the job.
Yeah, that's what I have been thinking. I was sort of hoping there was
something else out there that did all this besides sftp, because several
of
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dariush Pietrzak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: recommendations for FTP server
Date:Sat, 21 Jun 2003 01:09:45 +
I know about SSL/TLS support in Proftp, the only problem is that few clients
support it (thanks fot the link to the Woody backport). I would
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 16:25:30 -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Matt Zimmerman said:
[...]
Yeah, that's what I have been thinking. I was sort of hoping there was
something else out there that did all this besides sftp, because several
of my friends will be connecting from
36 matches
Mail list logo
