Hello Martin,
Thursday, June 10, 2004, 12:00:39 PM, you wrote:
MS -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MS Hash: SHA1
MS -
MS --
MS Debian Security Advisory DSA 517-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MS
I just noticed that my exim4 config access to
rbl.mail-abuse.org is no longer valid. I'd heard
Vixie had 'gone pro' but hadn't thought much
about it.
What are the recommended rbl's these days?
--
--
Dale Amon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just noticed that my exim4 config access to
rbl.mail-abuse.org is no longer valid. I'd heard
Vixie had 'gone pro' but hadn't thought much
about it.
I believe it's very old news, smth like 4-5 years or so.
What are the recommended rbl's these days?
Best thing is ask on NANAE or exim-users
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
What are the recommended rbl's these days?
Best thing is ask on NANAE or exim-users or whatever your favourite MTA is.
Here's what I am using here RBL-wise:
rbl_domains = bl.spamcop.net/reject :
You do realize that the osirusoft blacklists are defunct and have been
for several months, right? Basing your decision of whether or not to
accept mail from a given host based on an answer from a defunct
blacklist is probably not a good idea.
*ouch* thanks. I'm revising my blacklists now,
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 12:54:11PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
What are the recommended rbl's these days?
Best thing is ask on NANAE or exim-users or whatever your favourite MTA is.
Here's what I am using here
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
I believe it's very old news, smth like 4-5 years or so.
I'd not thought about it because they are still used
in the examples all over specs.txt. Perhaps I should
email Philip about it.
--
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 18:11, Dale Amon wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
I believe it's very old news, smth like 4-5 years or so.
I'd not thought about it because they are still used
in the examples all over specs.txt. Perhaps I should
email
First off, if you are not Richard Atterer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
and you are strapped for time, I'd like to warn you in advance that
this email is certified to contain less than ten percent useful
content.
On Jun 10, 2004, at 6:10 AM, Richard Atterer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 12:27:04PM
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 06:33:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I'd guess that was easier than fixing all the references to the RBL[+],
RSS and DUL littered through the documentation.
Point taken... but then again, who on Earth actually
re-reads the whole doc a second time, rather than
just a
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 18:48, Dale Amon wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 06:33:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I'd guess that was easier than fixing all the references to the RBL[+],
RSS and DUL littered through the documentation.
Point taken... but then again, who on Earth actually
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 17:01 +0100, Dale Amon wrote:
I just noticed that my exim4 config access to
rbl.mail-abuse.org is no longer valid. I'd heard
Vixie had 'gone pro' but hadn't thought much
about it.
What are the recommended rbl's these days?
--
i like the sbl-xbl lists at
Incoming from no name supplied:
First off, if you are not Richard Atterer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
and you are strapped for time, I'd like to warn you in advance that
Noted.
On Jun 10, 2004, at 6:10 AM, Richard Atterer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 12:27:04PM +0300, Dmitry Golubev wrote:
I
Hello, I have a special_offer for you...
WANT TO LOSE WEIGHT?
The most powerful weightloss is now available
without prescription. All natural Adipren720
100% Money Back Guarantée!
- Lose up to 19% Total Body Weight.
- Up to 300% more Weight Loss while dieting.
- Loss of 20-35% abdominal Fat.
-
Thank you for your request. We will reply to this as soon as possible. Our goal is to
reply the same day as we receive the request.
Your reference number in this case is: HD0. Please use this if you contact us again in
this matter.
Best Regards
Servicon Helpdesk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Thank you for your request. We will reply to this as soon as possible. Our goal is to
reply the same day as we receive the request.
Your reference number in this case is: HD0. Please use this if you contact us again in
this matter.
Best Regards
Servicon Helpdesk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 14 Jun 2004, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
What are the recommended rbl's these days?
Best thing is ask on NANAE or exim-users or whatever your favourite MTA is.
Here's what I am using here RBL-wise:
rbl_domains =
Also, for Vassilii - you use the SpamCop blacklists. That is something
that I would be very nervous of. They have some pretty liberal policies
about what they accept, and their automatic tools are not that great at
filtering out innocent parties...
This is why on the primary MX (which I
Hello Martin,
Thursday, June 10, 2004, 12:00:39 PM, you wrote:
MS -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MS Hash: SHA1
MS -
MS --
MS Debian Security Advisory DSA 517-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MS
I just noticed that my exim4 config access to
rbl.mail-abuse.org is no longer valid. I'd heard
Vixie had 'gone pro' but hadn't thought much
about it.
What are the recommended rbl's these days?
--
--
Dale Amon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just noticed that my exim4 config access to
rbl.mail-abuse.org is no longer valid. I'd heard
Vixie had 'gone pro' but hadn't thought much
about it.
I believe it's very old news, smth like 4-5 years or so.
What are the recommended rbl's these days?
Best thing is ask on NANAE or exim-users
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
What are the recommended rbl's these days?
Best thing is ask on NANAE or exim-users or whatever your favourite MTA is.
Here's what I am using here RBL-wise:
rbl_domains = bl.spamcop.net/reject :
You do realize that the osirusoft blacklists are defunct and have been
for several months, right? Basing your decision of whether or not to
accept mail from a given host based on an answer from a defunct
blacklist is probably not a good idea.
*ouch* thanks. I'm revising my blacklists now,
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 12:54:11PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
What are the recommended rbl's these days?
Best thing is ask on NANAE or exim-users or whatever your favourite MTA is.
Here's what I am using here
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
I believe it's very old news, smth like 4-5 years or so.
I'd not thought about it because they are still used
in the examples all over specs.txt. Perhaps I should
email Philip about it.
--
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 18:11, Dale Amon wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
I believe it's very old news, smth like 4-5 years or so.
I'd not thought about it because they are still used
in the examples all over specs.txt. Perhaps I should
email
First off, if you are not Richard Atterer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
and you are strapped for time, I'd like to warn you in advance that
this email is certified to contain less than ten percent useful
content.
On Jun 10, 2004, at 6:10 AM, Richard Atterer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 12:27:04PM
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 06:33:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I'd guess that was easier than fixing all the references to the RBL[+],
RSS and DUL littered through the documentation.
Point taken... but then again, who on Earth actually
re-reads the whole doc a second time, rather than
just a
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 18:48, Dale Amon wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 06:33:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I'd guess that was easier than fixing all the references to the RBL[+],
RSS and DUL littered through the documentation.
Point taken... but then again, who on Earth actually
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 17:01 +0100, Dale Amon wrote:
I just noticed that my exim4 config access to
rbl.mail-abuse.org is no longer valid. I'd heard
Vixie had 'gone pro' but hadn't thought much
about it.
What are the recommended rbl's these days?
--
i like the sbl-xbl lists at
Incoming from no name supplied:
First off, if you are not Richard Atterer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
and you are strapped for time, I'd like to warn you in advance that
Noted.
On Jun 10, 2004, at 6:10 AM, Richard Atterer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 12:27:04PM +0300, Dmitry Golubev wrote:
I
Thank you for your request. We will reply to this as soon as possible. Our goal
is to reply the same day as we receive the request.
Your reference number in this case is: HD0. Please use this if you contact us
again in this matter.
Best Regards
Servicon Helpdesk
Thank you for your request. We will reply to this as soon as possible. Our goal
is to reply the same day as we receive the request.
Your reference number in this case is: HD0. Please use this if you contact us
again in this matter.
Best Regards
Servicon Helpdesk
33 matches
Mail list logo
