Hi,
On 14/12/13 01:08, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Yeah, I think Linux went through similar blindness braindamage sometime ago,
but blind trust on rdrand has been fixed for a long time now, and it never
trusted any of the other HRNGs (or used them for anything at all without a
trip
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2013-12-14):
On 14/12/13 01:08, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Yeah, I think Linux went through similar blindness braindamage sometime ago,
but blind trust on rdrand has been fixed for a long time now, and it never
trusted any of the other HRNGs
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 20:30 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
The next point release for wheezy (7.3) is scheduled for Saturday
December 14th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
The archive side of the point release has finished and an early mirror
push is running, so
On 14/12/13 11:18, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
If you're talking about this:
| commit c2557a303ab6712bb6e09447df828c557c710ac9
| Author: Theodore Ts'o ty...@mit.edu
| Date: Thu Jul 5 10:35:23 2012 -0400
|
| random: add new get_random_bytes_arch() function
| […]
it was backported into
On Sat, 14 Dec 2013, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 14/12/13 01:08, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Yeah, I think Linux went through similar blindness braindamage sometime ago,
but blind trust on rdrand has been fixed for a long time now, and it never
trusted any of the other HRNGs (or
On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 19:00 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Sat, 14 Dec 2013, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 14/12/13 01:08, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Yeah, I think Linux went through similar blindness braindamage sometime
ago,
but blind trust on rdrand has been
Paul Wise:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 6:47 AM, adrelanos wrote:
is it possible to hook apt-get somehow to do some action done before
apt-get starts any network activity?
Based on a quick grep of the apt package, APT::Update::Pre-Invoke
might be what you want.
That seems perfect.
Here is
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:15 AM, adrelanos wrote:
I can try that. Should that become a separate package or part of, well
apt-get? It would probably just be three files, a config file, an
/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/ config fragment and a bash script.
I'm guessing the apt package would be the place
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
That would probably be fine for most Debian users but at that point I
remembered that the Riseup OpenGPG best practices document has
something to say about keyring refreshes; that keyring refreshes
should happen using
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Darius Jahandarie wrote:
This thread is probably not the most apropos place to bring this up,
but I've found parcimonie to be an terribly over-complex
implementation of the (good) design document that they wrote. It
requires pulling in dozens of perl modules,
10 matches
Mail list logo
