Adam,
Adding libdns58 and libisc50 solved the problem. Here is the dselect
output:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED
libdns55 libisc52
The following NEW packages will be installed
libdns58
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
On 12/29/2010 03:34 AM, Account for Debian group mail wrote:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED
bind9 bind9-host bind9utils dnsutils libbind9-50
On 12/30/2010 01:40 PM, Account for Debian group mail wrote:
Are you saying that dselect is no longer usefull on doing security
upgrades? I've been using dselect for over 15 years doing just that. The
only time I've used aptitude is for doing major version upgrades. If there
is a problem
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 18:34 -0800, Account for Debian group mail wrote:
Well I waited to see if someone came our with a solution to this problem,
none seen. So I'm updating another machine, here is what dselect is
showing me:
What that output doesn't include, which it should, is that there
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 13:57, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 18:34 -0800, Account for Debian group mail wrote:
Well I waited to see if someone came our with a solution to this problem,
none seen. So I'm updating another machine, here is what dselect is
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 14:07, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 13:57, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk
wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 18:34 -0800, Account for Debian group mail wrote:
Well I waited to see if someone came our with a solution to this
On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 14:07 -0500, Jim Popovitch wrote:
I used dselect to do the bind libs updates. The dependency mismatch
was handled by dselect, and I had to approve what appeared a downgrade
to libisc/dns.
I'm guessing this was the package name change from libisc52 to libisc50;
largely,
On 12/29/2010 03:34 AM, Account for Debian group mail wrote:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED
bind9 bind9-host bind9utils dnsutils libbind9-50 libisccfg50
The following packages will be upgraded:
Well I waited to see if someone came our with a solution to this problem,
none seen. So I'm updating another machine, here is what dselect is
showing me:
*** Req adminbase-files 5lenny7 5lenny8 Debian base system
miscellaneous files
*** Req admindpkg 1.14.29+b1
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Debian security:
Is there any plan to upgrade the bind version in debian to 9.6-ESV-R3
which correct the bugs?
There was a technical issue with the update process, which has been
resolved now. Updates will be released in due course.
Hello,
I
* Account for Debian group mail:
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Debian security:
Is there any plan to upgrade the bind version in debian to 9.6-ESV-R3
which correct the bugs?
There was a technical issue with the update process, which has been
resolved now. Updates will be
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Account for Debian group mail:
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Debian security:
Is there any plan to upgrade the bind version in debian to 9.6-ESV-R3
which correct the bugs?
There was a technical issue with the update process,
Le lundi 13 décembre 2010 à 08:29 -0800, Account for Debian group mail a
écrit :
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Debian security:
Is there any plan to upgrade the bind version in debian to 9.6-ESV-R3
which correct the bugs?
There was a technical issue with the update
* Debian security:
Is there any plan to upgrade the bind version in debian to 9.6-ESV-R3
which correct the bugs?
There was a technical issue with the update process, which has been
resolved now. Updates will be released in due course.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hello,
ISC published new versions of their DNS server: bind.
This version is corrects bug and one security issue (classified as High)
that impacts the version shipped in Debian Lenny.
It has been published yeterday and I still can't see any update in the
security repository.
Is there any plan to
On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 08:34:40 -1000, Debian security wrote:
Hello,
ISC published new versions of their DNS server: bind.
This version is corrects bug and one security issue (classified as High)
that impacts the version shipped in Debian Lenny.
It has been published yeterday and I still can't
On 2010-12-02, Debian security debian-secur...@mana.pf wrote:
--=-PKfS7p5OBjSN/MdjuBqP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,
ISC published new versions of their DNS server: bind.
This version is corrects bug and one security issue
On 02/12/10 14:09 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
https://www.isc.org/software/bind/advisories/cve-2010-3613
https://www.isc.org/software/bind/advisories/cve-2010-3614
This is the first I've heard of these issues. You can submit a bug
report against bind9 to encourage the maintainer to start
18 matches
Mail list logo
