Hello,
Am 13:28 03/08/02 +0200 hat Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn geschrieben:
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Michelle Konzack wrote:
there is a Debian-Package ssl-nfs (or secure-nfs) in the Mirror...
It is much more save the all other trics with your Networks.
And what mirror would that be? Any pointers?
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Michelle Konzack wrote:
there is a Debian-Package ssl-nfs (or secure-nfs) in the Mirror...
It is much more save the all other trics with your Networks.
And what mirror would that be? Any pointers?
Cheers,
Cristian
Hello,
there is a Debian-Package ssl-nfs (or secure-nfs) in the Mirror...
It is much more save the all other trics with your Networks.
Michelle
Am 13:07 25/07/02 -0500 hat Dast geschrieben:
Hello all,
So my question is, is it safer to host the NFS from the DMZ and mount
remotely on machines
cfy1 == cfy1 Dast writes:
cfy1 Hmm, I'll look into those filesystems. Are they supported in
cfy1 stock Debian kernels and userland tools or do they require
cfy1 extra patches?
dunno about SFS. AFS is packaged, but requires some kernel
modifications (IIRC it's just a kernel module) and a
Hello all,
I'm looking at re-arranging my network, which currently consists of an
ipmasq box with 3 nics, one going to the outside, one going to a DMZ,
and one going to an internal network. The masq box allows a few
services into machines in the DMZ, restricts the DMZ from getting
outside except
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 01:07:19PM -0500, Dast wrote:
So my question is, is it safer to host the NFS from the DMZ and
mount remotely on machines in the internal network, or host the NFS
from a machine on the internal network and remotely mount in the
DMZ? Or does it matter?
I suppose it
On Thursday, 2002-07-25 at 14:51:09 -0500, Dast wrote:
Mike Renfro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 01:07:19PM -0500, Dast wrote:
So my question is, is it safer to host the NFS from the DMZ and
mount remotely on machines in the internal network, or host the NFS
from
Quoting Dast ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
My problem is, I need to have a network mount shared between a machine
in the DMZ (untrusted) and machines in the internal network.
Hosting NFS on the ipmasq box is not an option for me.
Any chance you could use AFS or SFS for this, instead? As Mike Renfro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lupe Christoph) writes:
If you don't have realtime requirements, you could rsync between
the two machines.
The amount of data is many gigabytes, so I don't want to duplicate
things and use twice the disk space. Otherwise that would be a fine
solution.
--
--Dast
Practice
Rick Moen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any chance you could use AFS or SFS for this, instead? As Mike Renfro
points out, you're creating an intermachine dependency between the
bastion host and the inside machine no matter how you do it, but at
least, with those, the mount and resource-access
Quoting Dast ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hmm, I'll look into those filesystems. Are they supported in stock
Debian kernels and userland tools or do they require extra patches?
I have no idea about Debian packaging.
For SFS of Linux, you'll need your Linux system to have a kernel with
NFSv3 support
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 07:23:43PM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
Hmm, I'll look into those filesystems. Are they supported in stock
Debian kernels and userland tools or do they require extra patches?
I have no idea about Debian packaging.
For SFS of Linux, you'll need your Linux system to
12 matches
Mail list logo
