On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 06:07:00PM +0200, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
> Well; you are right Patrick; [ ... snip ... ]
Other thing that Patrick does right,
is making it possible to read in discussion order
Please reply below the text
Well; you are right Patrick; perhaps I should do something to awake
debcheckroot from its slumber! If I am not the one who can build a
respective infrastructure around the project (i.e. checksums for all
Debian packages) and develop the code forth then someone else would do
it as there seems
Elmar Stellnberger:
> Dear Debian-Security
>
> Having just released debcheckroot I wanna shortly present you my new tool:
> It was originally designed as a replacement for debsums and has the following
> qualities:
> * full support of Debian repos reading /etc/[apt/]sources.list to fetch
>
The tool is now ready to be downloaded at
http://www.elstel.org/debcheckroot.
Feedback will be highly appreciated!
Am 28.01.2014 11:40, schrieb Elmar Stellnberger:
Dear Debian-Security
Having just released debcheckroot I wanna shortly present you my new tool:
It was originally designed as
.*
**
*From:* Elmar Stellnberger estel...@gmail.com
*To:* debian-security@lists.debian.org
*Sent:* Saturday, April 5, 2014 5:39 AM
*Subject:* Re: debcheckroot v1.0 released
The tool is now ready to be downloaded at
http
Hi Elmar!
This is a most interesting tool!
The opensuse logo on http://www.elstel.org/debcheckroot/ is confusing,
since this is a Debian tool. This might scare of interested people.
As Debian package headers do not use to be signed
I think you are mistaken here or maybe I misunderstand. When
Am 05.04.2014 15:23, schrieb Patrick Schleizer:
Hi Elmar!
This is a most interesting tool!
The opensuse logo on http://www.elstel.org/debcheckroot/ is confusing,
since this is a Debian tool. This might scare of interested people.
Oh, what an embarrassing mishap!
Many Thanks for your evidence
On Sat, 2014-04-05 at 16:52 +, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
Am 05.04.2014 15:23, schrieb Patrick Schleizer:
As Debian package headers do not use to be signed
I think you are mistaken here or maybe I misunderstand. When you have a
Debian medium you trust (such as a Live DVD from a trusted
Ah; sometimes you oversee what is not hard to see; I am just updating
the web page for debcheckroot;
thx kind regards, Elmar.
Am 05.04.2014 17:00, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
On Sat, 2014-04-05 at 16:52 +, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
Am 05.04.2014 15:23, schrieb Patrick Schleizer:
As Debian
Hi Patrick! Hi Adam!
Am 05.04.2014 15:23, schrieb Patrick Schleizer:
This approach seemed futile to me. At least for now. There are too many
files, that are automatically generated created by postinst scripts. For
example /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/**/__init__.pyc gets automatically
Elmar Stellnberger:
As Debian package headers do not use to be signed
I think you are mistaken here or maybe I misunderstand. When you have a
Debian medium you trust (such as a Live DVD from a trusted source), we
can regard keys in /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/ and /etc/apt/trusted.gpg as
trusted.
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Patrick Schleizer wrote:
This approach seemed futile to me. At least for now. There are too many
files, that are automatically generated created by postinst scripts. For
example /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/**/__init__.pyc gets automatically
generated. Even
Dear Debian-Security
Having just released debcheckroot I wanna shortly present you my new tool:
It was originally designed as a replacement for debsums and has the following
qualities:
* full support of Debian repos reading /etc/[apt/]sources.list to fetch
checksums online
* it can check a
13 matches
Mail list logo
