What is this? I
don't think anyone got in though, everything seems to befine.I'm running
woody and rpc.statd version 0.3.3Dec 29 14:10:58 name rpc.statd[3364]:
gethostbyname error
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 09:11:41PM +0100, David Gestel wrote:
What is this? I don't think anyone got in though, everything seems to be
fine.
I'm running woody and rpc.statd version 0.3.3
Yep. The fact that it was logged in this particular case means you're
fine.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
your libs and stuff to make sure your
versions are up to snuff. apt-get dist-upgrade is always a
good
thing,
right?
-Original Message-From: David Gestel
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 3:12
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: faq?
rpc.statd: gethostby
David == David Gestel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David What is this? I don't think anyone got in though, everything seems to be
David fine.
David I'm running woody and rpc.statd version 0.3.3
David Dec 29 14:10:58 name rpc.statd[3364]: gethostbyname error for
David
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 03:18:46PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
Yep. The fact that it was logged in this particular case means you're
fine.
A long time ago a RedHat 6.2 box i had account on was exploited using the same
exploit, and it did log that. I'd recommend running chkrootkit or
What is this? I
don't think anyone got in though, everything seems to befine.I'm running
woody and rpc.statd version 0.3.3Dec 29 14:10:58 name rpc.statd[3364]:
gethostbyname error
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 09:11:41PM +0100, David Gestel wrote:
What is this? I don't think anyone got in though, everything seems to be
fine.
I'm running woody and rpc.statd version 0.3.3
Yep. The fact that it was logged in this particular case means you're
fine.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
your libs and stuff to make sure your
versions are up to snuff. apt-get dist-upgrade is always a
good
thing,
right?
-Original Message-From: David Gestel
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 3:12
PMTo: debian-security@lists.debian.orgSubject: faq?
rpc.statd: get
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 09:11:41PM +0100, David Gestel wrote:
Dec 29 14:10:58 name rpc.statd[3364]: gethostbyname error for
^X÷ÿ¿^X÷ÿ¿^Z÷ÿ¿^Z÷ÿ¿%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%62716x%hn%51859x%hn\220\220\
Do you use NFS, NIS or anything that needs portmap? If not, then you might want
to uninstall
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 03:18:46PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
Yep. The fact that it was logged in this particular case means you're
fine.
A long time ago a RedHat 6.2 box i had account on was exploited using the same
exploit, and it did log that. I'd recommend running chkrootkit or
10 matches
Mail list logo
