On Sunday 13 June 2004 18.01, Dale Amon wrote:
What are the recommended rbl's these days?
Just one opinion more:
(ok, this is postfix syntax. But let's not start this war here :-)
reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org,
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
these are very good and catch
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 16:39, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also you may want to look at the rfc-ignorant.org ones, but reading
nanae I got the impression that they are more trouble than they're
worth.
This thread inspired me to fiddle with my anti-spam settings
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 04:57:42PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
a test message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it hasn't bounced yet... Maybe the
Yahoo abuse team are being butt-head's about clicking on the removal URL.
Yeah, just I found I got listed by ignoramuses about RFC's due to a
mail helper
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 04:57:42PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
relays.ordb.org, reject_rhsbl_client rhsbl.sorbs.net, reject_rhsbl_client
dsn.rfc-ignorant.org, reject_rhsbl_client postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
Just to publicly eat my previous words... I submitted
the request, had a *person*
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
This sort of thing is why I would rather use any RBL within
SpamAssassin, rather than at SMTP delivery time. Even if one of these
services goes completely belly up and blacklists the world, I don't
automatically lose mail from it.
Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
This sort of thing is why I would rather use any RBL within
SpamAssassin, rather than at SMTP delivery time. Even if one of these
services goes completely belly up and blacklists the world, I don't
On 14 Jun 2004, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
This sort of thing is why I would rather use any RBL within
SpamAssassin, rather than at SMTP delivery time. Even if one of these
services goes completely belly up and blacklists the world, I don't
automatically
Also, for Vassilii - you use the SpamCop blacklists. That is something
that I would be very nervous of. They have some pretty liberal policies
about what they accept, and their automatic tools are not that great at
filtering out innocent parties...
This is why on the primary MX (which I
On Sunday 13 June 2004 18.01, Dale Amon wrote:
What are the recommended rbl's these days?
Just one opinion more:
(ok, this is postfix syntax. But let's not start this war here :-)
reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org,
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
these are very good and catch
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 16:39, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also you may want to look at the rfc-ignorant.org ones, but reading
nanae I got the impression that they are more trouble than they're
worth.
This thread inspired me to fiddle with my anti-spam settings
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 04:57:42PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
a test message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it hasn't bounced yet... Maybe the
Yahoo abuse team are being butt-head's about clicking on the removal URL.
Yeah, just I found I got listed by ignoramuses about RFC's due to a
mail helper
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 04:57:42PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
relays.ordb.org, reject_rhsbl_client rhsbl.sorbs.net, reject_rhsbl_client
dsn.rfc-ignorant.org, reject_rhsbl_client postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
Just to publicly eat my previous words... I submitted
the request, had a *person*
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
This sort of thing is why I would rather use any RBL within
SpamAssassin, rather than at SMTP delivery time. Even if one of these
services goes completely belly up and blacklists the world, I don't
automatically lose mail from it.
Please dont do this.
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
This sort of thing is why I would rather use any RBL within
SpamAssassin, rather than at SMTP delivery time. Even if one of these
services goes completely belly up and blacklists the world, I don't
automatically lose mail from it.
Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
This sort of thing is why I would rather use any RBL within
SpamAssassin, rather than at SMTP delivery time. Even if one of these
services goes completely belly up and blacklists the world, I don't
On 14 Jun 2004, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
This sort of thing is why I would rather use any RBL within
SpamAssassin, rather than at SMTP delivery time. Even if one of these
services goes completely belly up and blacklists the world, I don't
automatically
I just noticed that my exim4 config access to
rbl.mail-abuse.org is no longer valid. I'd heard
Vixie had 'gone pro' but hadn't thought much
about it.
What are the recommended rbl's these days?
--
--
Dale Amon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just noticed that my exim4 config access to
rbl.mail-abuse.org is no longer valid. I'd heard
Vixie had 'gone pro' but hadn't thought much
about it.
I believe it's very old news, smth like 4-5 years or so.
What are the recommended rbl's these days?
Best thing is ask on NANAE or exim-users
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
What are the recommended rbl's these days?
Best thing is ask on NANAE or exim-users or whatever your favourite MTA is.
Here's what I am using here RBL-wise:
rbl_domains = bl.spamcop.net/reject :
You do realize that the osirusoft blacklists are defunct and have been
for several months, right? Basing your decision of whether or not to
accept mail from a given host based on an answer from a defunct
blacklist is probably not a good idea.
*ouch* thanks. I'm revising my blacklists now,
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 12:54:11PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
What are the recommended rbl's these days?
Best thing is ask on NANAE or exim-users or whatever your favourite MTA is.
Here's what I am using here
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
I believe it's very old news, smth like 4-5 years or so.
I'd not thought about it because they are still used
in the examples all over specs.txt. Perhaps I should
email Philip about it.
--
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 18:11, Dale Amon wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
I believe it's very old news, smth like 4-5 years or so.
I'd not thought about it because they are still used
in the examples all over specs.txt. Perhaps I should
email
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 06:33:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I'd guess that was easier than fixing all the references to the RBL[+],
RSS and DUL littered through the documentation.
Point taken... but then again, who on Earth actually
re-reads the whole doc a second time, rather than
just a
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 18:48, Dale Amon wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 06:33:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I'd guess that was easier than fixing all the references to the RBL[+],
RSS and DUL littered through the documentation.
Point taken... but then again, who on Earth actually
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 17:01 +0100, Dale Amon wrote:
I just noticed that my exim4 config access to
rbl.mail-abuse.org is no longer valid. I'd heard
Vixie had 'gone pro' but hadn't thought much
about it.
What are the recommended rbl's these days?
--
i like the sbl-xbl lists at
On 14 Jun 2004, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
What are the recommended rbl's these days?
Best thing is ask on NANAE or exim-users or whatever your favourite MTA is.
Here's what I am using here RBL-wise:
rbl_domains =
Also, for Vassilii - you use the SpamCop blacklists. That is something
that I would be very nervous of. They have some pretty liberal policies
about what they accept, and their automatic tools are not that great at
filtering out innocent parties...
This is why on the primary MX (which I
I just noticed that my exim4 config access to
rbl.mail-abuse.org is no longer valid. I'd heard
Vixie had 'gone pro' but hadn't thought much
about it.
What are the recommended rbl's these days?
--
--
Dale Amon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just noticed that my exim4 config access to
rbl.mail-abuse.org is no longer valid. I'd heard
Vixie had 'gone pro' but hadn't thought much
about it.
I believe it's very old news, smth like 4-5 years or so.
What are the recommended rbl's these days?
Best thing is ask on NANAE or exim-users
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
What are the recommended rbl's these days?
Best thing is ask on NANAE or exim-users or whatever your favourite MTA is.
Here's what I am using here RBL-wise:
rbl_domains = bl.spamcop.net/reject :
You do realize that the osirusoft blacklists are defunct and have been
for several months, right? Basing your decision of whether or not to
accept mail from a given host based on an answer from a defunct
blacklist is probably not a good idea.
*ouch* thanks. I'm revising my blacklists now,
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 12:54:11PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
What are the recommended rbl's these days?
Best thing is ask on NANAE or exim-users or whatever your favourite MTA is.
Here's what I am using here
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
I believe it's very old news, smth like 4-5 years or so.
I'd not thought about it because they are still used
in the examples all over specs.txt. Perhaps I should
email Philip about it.
--
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 18:11, Dale Amon wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
I believe it's very old news, smth like 4-5 years or so.
I'd not thought about it because they are still used
in the examples all over specs.txt. Perhaps I should
email
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 06:33:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I'd guess that was easier than fixing all the references to the RBL[+],
RSS and DUL littered through the documentation.
Point taken... but then again, who on Earth actually
re-reads the whole doc a second time, rather than
just a
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 18:48, Dale Amon wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 06:33:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I'd guess that was easier than fixing all the references to the RBL[+],
RSS and DUL littered through the documentation.
Point taken... but then again, who on Earth actually
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 17:01 +0100, Dale Amon wrote:
I just noticed that my exim4 config access to
rbl.mail-abuse.org is no longer valid. I'd heard
Vixie had 'gone pro' but hadn't thought much
about it.
What are the recommended rbl's these days?
--
i like the sbl-xbl lists at
38 matches
Mail list logo
