Re: exim4 router problems since 2 days / sucpicous process zinit is pstree

2010-12-17 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 12/17/2010 12:00 PM, Thorsten Göllner wrote: Hi, I have installed Debian 5.0.7. Since 2 days my exim4 does not deliver mails. I always get the message, that the mail is not routeable. I only used dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config without touching one config file by hand. I detected a log

Re: exim4 router problems since 2 days / sucpicous process zinit is pstree

2010-12-17 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 12/17/2010 12:35 PM, Vladislav Kurz wrote: On Friday 17 of December 2010, Thorsten Göllner wrote: Hi, I have installed Debian 5.0.7. Since 2 days my exim4 does not deliver mails. I always get the message, that the mail is not routeable. I only used dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config without

Re: Bind security announce

2010-12-29 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 12/29/2010 03:34 AM, Account for Debian group mail wrote: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be REMOVED bind9 bind9-host bind9utils dnsutils libbind9-50 libisccfg50 The following packages will be upgraded:

Re: Bind security announce

2010-12-30 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 12/30/2010 01:40 PM, Account for Debian group mail wrote: Are you saying that dselect is no longer usefull on doing security upgrades? I've been using dselect for over 15 years doing just that. The only time I've used aptitude is for doing major version upgrades. If there is a problem

Re: Grave apache dos possible through byterange requests

2011-08-24 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 24/08/11 08:53, Dirk Hartmann wrote: Hi, it is possible to dos a actual squeeze-apache2 with easy to forge rage-requests: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2011-August/082299.html Apache-devs are working on a solution:

Re: Grave apache dos possible through byterange requests

2011-08-24 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 24/08/11 12:45, Andrea Zwirner wrote: 2011/8/24 Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez clo...@igalia.com On 24/08/11 08:53, Dirk Hartmann wrote: Hi, it is possible to dos a actual squeeze-apache2 with easy to forge rage-requests: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2011-August

Re: Grave apache dos possible through byterange requests

2011-08-24 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 24/08/11 12:13, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: You can use the following redirect as a temporally workaround: # a2enmod rewrite RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{HTTP:Range} bytes=0-.* [NC] RewriteRule .? http://%{SERVER_NAME}/ [R=302,L] Sorry, the above redirect is wrong. It won't

Re: Grave apache dos possible through byterange requests

2011-08-24 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 24/08/11 14:12, Andrew McGlashan wrote: Would that work for all websites of a Debian server if placed into a file located in /etc/apache2/conf.d ? Will other rewrites will be fine in the normal conf files for each website? Thanks It should not mess with another redirects that you

Re: Grave apache dos possible through byterange requests

2011-08-26 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 26/08/11 11:17, Christian Hammers wrote: Hallo Word is spreading that Request-Range: seems to be a synonym to Range: and is similar vulnerable but not covered by the config snippets that were proposed yesterday. So Gentlemen, patch again! :-( Confirmed!. Just modified the suggest

Re: Grave apache dos possible through byterange requests

2011-08-26 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 26/08/11 13:22, linbloke wrote: Hello, I'm curious as to why you suggest option 2 over option 1 from the Apache advisory? My guess is that it is compatible with version 1.3 and 2.x and that is has stronger enforcement of the syntax (by requiring ^bytes=) rather than just 5 comma

Security response: how are we doing?

2011-11-28 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
https://lwn.net/Articles/467615/ [...] Ideally, a table like the above should have no none entries at all. There was no distributor without unpatched vulnerabilities, but some clearly have more than others. It is, in particular, sad to see so many missing updates in the Debian column. One could

Re: SELinux on Squeeze?

2011-12-31 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
-- ~~~ Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez http://neutrino.es Igalia - Free Software Engineeringhttp://www.igalia.com ~~~ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 2403-1] php5 security update

2012-02-05 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 05/02/12 22:52, Luk Claes wrote: On 02/05/2012 05:23 PM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: On 04/02/12 01:12, Luk Claes wrote: On 02/03/2012 10:35 PM, Mario Antonio wrote: Do you think that there will be a fix for Lenny even though Lenny will be ending his life this weekend ? It's

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 2418-1] postgresql-8.4 security update

2012-02-27 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
! [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661502 -- ~~~ Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez http://neutrino.es Igalia - Free Software Engineeringhttp://www.igalia.com

Re: Dedicated server vs. VPS

2012-03-05 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
extract the key easily from there. Regards! [1] http://blog.neutrino.es/2011/unlocking-a-luks-encrypted-root-partition-remotely-via-ssh/ -- ~~~ Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez http://neutrino.es

Re: Zero Day MySQL Buffer Overflow

2012-12-03 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 02/12/12 22:50, daniel curtis wrote: Hi, I would like to inform about a new stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability for MySQL. The following CVEs have been assigned to track this MySQL vulnerability: CVE-2012-5611 MySQL (Linux) Stack based buffer overrun PoC Zeroday CVE-2012-5612

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 2605-1] asterisk security update

2013-01-14 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 13/01/13 21:36, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: - Debian Security Advisory DSA-2605-1 secur...@debian.org http://www.debian.org/security/ Thijs Kinkhorst January 13, 2013

Re: about bash and Debian Lenny

2014-10-01 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 01/10/14 13:28, Nikolay Hristov wrote: Hello there, I know that this is outdated debian release and it is in the archives but I still have 6 servers running Lenny and I don't want to upgrade them to newer versions for several reasons. Any chance that we will get official debian package

Re: about bash and Debian Lenny

2014-10-05 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 04/10/14 06:44, Marko Randjelovic wrote: On Wed, 01 Oct 2014 17:30:11 +0200 Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez clo...@igalia.com wrote: On 01/10/14 13:28, Nikolay Hristov wrote: Hello there, I know that this is outdated debian release and it is in the archives but I still have 6 servers

Re: about bash and Debian Lenny

2014-10-06 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 06/10/14 17:59, Marko Randjelovic wrote: On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 03:25:27 +0200 Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez clo...@igalia.com wrote: I have built patched packages for lenny. You can download them from here: http://people.igalia.com/clopez/bash-shellshock-lenny/ If you are not willing

Re: about bash and Debian Lenny

2014-10-06 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 06/10/14 20:40, Simon Valiquette wrote: Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez un jour écrivit: Maybe your http client is unable to understand Content-Encoding: gzip ? I downloaded the files from the provided location with Links2 web browser. The file bash_3.2-4+deb5u1.dsc was a gzipped file. After