Bug#908678: Testing the filter-branch scripts

2018-11-13 Thread Daniel Lange
Am 13.11.18 um 23:09 schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff: > The current data structure works very well for us and splitting the files > has many downsides. Could you detail what those many downsides are besides the scripts that need to be amended?

External check

2018-11-13 Thread Security Tracker
CVE-2018-14655: TODO: check CVE-2018-14657: TODO: check CVE-2018-14658: TODO: check CVE-2018-15978: RESERVED CVE-2018-19208: TODO: check -- The output might be a bit terse, but the above ids are known elsewhere, check the references in the tracker. The second part indicates the status of that

Bug#908678: Testing the filter-branch scripts

2018-11-13 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 12:22:54PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > But before going through that trouble, I think we'd need to get approval > from the security team first, as that's quite a lot of work. I figured > we would make a feasability study first... The current data structure works very

Bug#908678: Testing the filter-branch scripts

2018-11-13 Thread Daniel Lange
> The Python job finished successfully here after 10 hours. 6h40 mins here as I ported your improved logic to the python2 version :). # git filter-branch --tree-filter '/usr/bin/python2 /split-by-year.pyc' HEAD Rewrite 1169d256b27eb7244273671582cc08ba88002819 (68356/68357) (24226 seconds passed,

Bug#908678: Testing the filter-branch scripts

2018-11-13 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2018-11-12 12:22:58, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > I'll start a run on the whole history to see if I can find any problems, > as soon as a first clone finishes resolving those damn deltas. ;) The Python job finished successfully here after 10 hours. I did some tests on the new git repository.