Hi,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 07:45:59PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 07:34:03AM +0100, Daniel Lange wrote:
> > Am 13.11.18 um 23:09 schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff:
> > > The current data structure works very well for us and splitting the files
> > > has many downsides.
>
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 07:45:59PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Nearly all the tasks of actually editing the data require a look at the
> complete
> data, e.g. to check whether something was tracked before, whether there's an
> ITP
> for something, whether something was tracked as NFU in
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 07:34:03AM +0100, Daniel Lange wrote:
> Am 13.11.18 um 23:09 schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff:
> > The current data structure works very well for us and splitting the files
> > has many downsides.
>
> Could you detail what those many downsides are besides the scripts that
> need
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 11:09:41PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 12:22:54PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > But before going through that trouble, I think we'd need to get approval
> > from the security team first, as that's quite a lot of work. I figured
> > we
Am 13.11.18 um 23:09 schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff:
> The current data structure works very well for us and splitting the files
> has many downsides.
Could you detail what those many downsides are besides the scripts that
need to be amended?
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 12:22:54PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> But before going through that trouble, I think we'd need to get approval
> from the security team first, as that's quite a lot of work. I figured
> we would make a feasability study first...
The current data structure works very
> The Python job finished successfully here after 10 hours.
6h40 mins here as I ported your improved logic to the python2 version :).
# git filter-branch --tree-filter '/usr/bin/python2 /split-by-year.pyc' HEAD
Rewrite 1169d256b27eb7244273671582cc08ba88002819 (68356/68357) (24226 seconds
passed,
On 2018-11-12 12:22:58, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> I'll start a run on the whole history to see if I can find any problems,
> as soon as a first clone finishes resolving those damn deltas. ;)
The Python job finished successfully here after 10 hours.
I did some tests on the new git repository.
On 2018-11-10 18:56:01, Daniel Lange wrote:
> Antoine,
>
> thank you very much for your filter-branch scripts.
you're welcome! glad it can be of use.
> I tested each:
>
> 1) the golang version:
> It completes after 3h36min:
>
> # git filter-branch --tree-filter '/split-by-year' HEAD
> Rewrite
9 matches
Mail list logo
