Re Bonjour,
Le Sat, 22 Nov 2014 08:41:13 +0100,
YP a écrit :
Le 22/11/2014 08:02, Georges a écrit :
Et je tombe sur le message : Ce site n'est pas certifié Sortir
de là ?
Me parais étonnent pour linufr.org, un usurpateur ?
ttps://linuxfr.org/aide#aide-certificatssl
Salut la liste,
Hier soir, je désactive NFS via la commande systemctl disable
nfs-common.service.
Elle m'affiche bien qu'elle met à jour les liens via un update-rc.d.
Mais ce matin, au démarrage, NFS est de retour.
Normal : les liens sont toujours là.
Re-systemctl disable et vérification dans
Sat, 22 Nov 2014 17:36:47 +0100
Jean-Marc jean-m...@6jf.be écrivait :
Salut la liste,
Hier soir, je désactive NFS via la commande systemctl disable
nfs-common.service.
Elle m'affiche bien qu'elle met à jour les liens via un update-rc.d.
Mais ce matin, au démarrage, NFS est de retour.
Bonsoir
J'ai enregistré un MP3.
Je voudrais mettre dessus des images pour en faire un AVI
Toutes les images (une centaine) sont stockées dans un dossier.
Quel programme peut faire cela, je n'y connais pas grand chose en montage
vidéo, j'ai essayé lives, mais les images tournent beaucoup trop vite
Le Sat, 22 Nov 2014 19:54:12 +0100
Cyrille cyri...@cbiot.fr a écrit:
Je voulais installer openshot mais aptitude ne trouve pas blender
(dépendance) sur le ftp de debian.fr (erreur 404) et donc bloque
l'installation Je suis sous stable.
Blender n'est pas une dépendance d'openshot c'est juste
On 11/22/2014 05:54 PM, Jean-Marc wrote:
Sat, 22 Nov 2014 17:36:47 +0100
Jean-Marc jean-m...@6jf.be écrivait :
Salut la liste,
Hier soir, je désactive NFS via la commande systemctl disable
nfs-common.service.
Elle m'affiche bien qu'elle met à jour les liens via un update-rc.d.
Mais ce
Bonjour,
Est-il possible d'accéder à Google Drive comme on peut le faire avec Dropbox
dans nautilus ?
J'ai vu le paquet gnome-online-miners qu semble pouvoir faire des recherches
dans google drive mais ça ne semble pas fonctionner.
Gaëtan
--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question
Le 23 novembre 2014 00:11, Gaëtan PERRIER gaetan.perr...@neuf.fr a écrit :
Bonjour,
Est-il possible d'accéder à Google Drive comme on peut le faire avec Dropbox
dans Nautilus ?
J'ai vu le paquet gnome-online-miners qui semble pouvoir faire des recherches
dans Google Drive mais ça ne semble
Bonjour,
je sollicite votre aide car je suis en train de m'arracher mes dderniers
cheveux -) depuis 2 jours sur une configuration de Bumblebee avec un
systeme Optimus conjuguant une carte integree Intel une Nvidia Quadro
K1000M .
Je m'interesse a cela car comme sur crertains portables , la sortie
Le Sun, 23 Nov 2014 01:10:28 +0100
S L slest...@gmail.com a écrit:
Le 23 novembre 2014 00:11, Gaëtan PERRIER gaetan.perr...@neuf.fr a écrit :
Bonjour,
Est-il possible d'accéder à Google Drive comme on peut le faire avec
Dropbox dans Nautilus ?
J'ai vu le paquet gnome-online-miners qui
moi j'utilise hubic d'OVH client sur tous les os etc
https://hubic.com/fr/
c'est du owncloud mutualisé
25GO gratuit
Le 23/11/2014 01:20, Gaëtan PERRIER a écrit :
Le Sun, 23 Nov 2014 01:10:28 +0100
S L slest...@gmail.com a écrit:
Le 23 novembre 2014 00:11, Gaëtan PERRIER
J'en suis fort content mais c'est toujours HS.
Je ne vous demande pas une solution pour remplacer Google Drive, j'en connais
plein déjà et j'en utilise déjà, mais comment accéder à Google
Drive depuis Debian via nautilus.
Gaëtan
Le Sun, 23 Nov 2014 01:38:52 +0100
sylvain baal cont...@baal.fr a
Bonjour,
si c'est un montage que tu veux faire, peu être que ceci t'aidera:
http://linuxaria.com/article/how-to-access-google-drive-on-linux
bonne journée
Le 23 nov. 2014 01:44, Gaëtan PERRIER gaetan.perr...@neuf.fr a écrit :
J'en suis fort content mais c'est toujours HS.
Je ne vous demande
Bonjour,
Dans la continuité du message précédent, voici ma procédure :
Ajout du repository suivant :
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/alessandro-strada/ppa/ubuntu trusty main
Installation :
apt-get install google-drive-ocamlfuse
Montage (à ajouter à l'ouverture de session) :
google-drive-ocamlfuse
2014-11-21 22:22 GMT+00:00 Santiago Vila sanv...@unex.es:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 07:37:02PM +, C. L. Martinez wrote:
Aun así, no pierdas de vista que para los mandamases del proyecto es
el init por defecto. Eso quiere decir que si siguen en sus trece,
terminarás tragando con systemd de
El viernes, 21 nov 2014 a las 20:20 horas (UTC+1),
Manolo Díaz escribió:
No obstante, la diferencia es fundamental: XFCE *sí* se puede instalar
sin systemd y no debe ponerse en el mismo plano que GNOME.
Lo anterior puede llevar a confusión: GNOME puede instalarse con
systemd-shim, entonces
El sábado, 22 nov 2014 a las 12:37 horas (UTC+1),
C. L. Martinez escribió:
Si a tú a un desarrollador (que ahora mismo no estoy seguro si
es coincidente con el mantenedor de paquetes en Debian), le dices:
¿que prefieres desarrollar: 5 distintos sistemas de
configuración/scripts etc para un
2014-11-22 12:10 GMT+00:00 Manolo Díaz diaz.man...@gmail.com:
El sábado, 22 nov 2014 a las 12:37 horas (UTC+1),
C. L. Martinez escribió:
Si a tú a un desarrollador (que ahora mismo no estoy seguro si
es coincidente con el mantenedor de paquetes en Debian), le dices:
¿que prefieres desarrollar:
El Fri, 21 Nov 2014 17:36:46 -0300, Epsilon Minus escribió:
Buenas..
(ese html...)
Para un sistema privado en Sistemas de 32bits agregaba un link simbolico
a una libreria de Java de Oracle el JRE 6 sobre
/usr/lib/iceweasel/plugins
ahora mismo tengo un Debian 64 y se me esta haciendo
El Fri, 21 Nov 2014 20:20:53 +0100, Manolo Díaz escribió:
El viernes, 21 nov 2014 a las 19:47 horas (UTC+1),
Camaleón escribió:
No sólo GNOME sino también XFCE. Y no me vengas con que un usuario puede
montar manualmente las llaves USB porque eso es absurdo y surrealista.
Bueno, más que
El 22/11/14 14:03, Camaleón escribió:
El Fri, 21 Nov 2014 20:20:53 +0100, Manolo Díaz escribió:
El viernes, 21 nov 2014 a las 19:47 horas (UTC+1),
Camaleón escribió:
No sólo GNOME sino también XFCE. Y no me vengas con que un usuario puede
montar manualmente las llaves USB porque eso es
El sábado, 22 nov 2014 a las 14:03 horas (UTC+1),
Camaleón escribió:
No obstante, la diferencia es fundamental: XFCE *sí* se puede instalar
sin systemd y no debe ponerse en el mismo plano que GNOME.
No, no se puede (acuérdate de libpam-systemd).
Sí, sí se puede. Demostración: apt,
2014-11-22 13:36 GMT+00:00 Gerardo Diez García gerardo.diez.gar...@gmail.com:
El 22/11/14 14:03, Camaleón escribió:
El Fri, 21 Nov 2014 20:20:53 +0100, Manolo Díaz escribió:
El viernes, 21 nov 2014 a las 19:47 horas (UTC+1),
Camaleón escribió:
No sólo GNOME sino también XFCE. Y no me vengas
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 11:37:48AM +, C. L. Martinez wrote:
[...] república bananera [...]
Vaya. Parece que vamos cambiando el término según el caso.
¿En qué quedamos entonces? ¿hay mandamases o no hay mandamases?
Según la constitución, podría haber habido una GR para que el sistema
de
El Sat, 22 Nov 2014 14:45:44 +0100, Manolo Díaz escribió:
El sábado, 22 nov 2014 a las 14:03 horas (UTC+1),
Camaleón escribió:
No obstante, la diferencia es fundamental: XFCE *sí* se puede instalar
sin systemd y no debe ponerse en el mismo plano que GNOME.
No, no se puede (acuérdate de
El Sat, 22 Nov 2014 14:36:02 +0100, Gerardo Diez García escribió:
El 22/11/14 14:03, Camaleón escribió:
El Fri, 21 Nov 2014 20:20:53 +0100, Manolo Díaz escribió:
(...)
No obstante, la diferencia es fundamental: XFCE *sí* se puede instalar
sin systemd y no debe ponerse en el mismo plano que
El 22/11/14 15:49, Camaleón escribió:
El Sat, 22 Nov 2014 14:36:02 +0100, Gerardo Diez García escribió:
El 22/11/14 14:03, Camaleón escribió:
El Fri, 21 Nov 2014 20:20:53 +0100, Manolo Díaz escribió:
(...)
No obstante, la diferencia es fundamental: XFCE *sí* se puede instalar
sin
El Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:14:35 +0100, Gerardo Diez García escribió:
El 22/11/14 15:49, Camaleón escribió:
(...)
Un usuario medio no administra servidores. Y aquí se le está dando
cera al desempeño de systemd en servidores. ¿O se está jugando al
trile?
Los administradores también usamos
El sábado, 22 nov 2014 a las 15:34 horas (UTC+1),
Camaleón escribió:
El Sat, 22 Nov 2014 14:45:44 +0100, Manolo Díaz escribió:
El sábado, 22 nov 2014 a las 14:03 horas (UTC+1),
Camaleón escribió:
No obstante, la diferencia es fundamental: XFCE *sí* se puede instalar
sin systemd y no debe
El sábado, 22 nov 2014 a las 16:59 horas (UTC+1),
Manolo Díaz escribió:
$ dpkg -l gvfs network-manager udisks2 hplip policykit-1 systemd
||/ NombreVersión Arquitectura
Descripción
El Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:59:02 +0100, Manolo Díaz escribió:
El sábado, 22 nov 2014 a las 15:34 horas (UTC+1),
Camaleón escribió:
(...)
Sí, sí se puede. Demostración: apt, synaptics, etc.
No sé a qué te refieres con eso.
A que en lugar de teorizar hagas la prueba. Nota: la configuración
El sábado, 22 nov 2014 a las 18:00 horas (UTC+1),
Camaleón escribió:
El Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:59:02 +0100, Manolo Díaz escribió:
El sábado, 22 nov 2014 a las 15:34 horas (UTC+1),
Camaleón escribió:
(...)
Sí, sí se puede. Demostración: apt, synaptics, etc.
No sé a qué te refieres con eso.
El Sat, 22 Nov 2014 18:45:17 +0100, Manolo Díaz escribió:
El sábado, 22 nov 2014 a las 18:00 horas (UTC+1),
Camaleón escribió:
(...)
Las opciones son las siguientes:
1. Puedes prescindir de esos paquetes: instalas xfce4 sin más.
No, no puedo.
2. No puedes: instalas systemd
Eso es lo
Estimado Afiliado:
El dia de hoy te traemos Un Robot Que Publica Por Ti En Facebook sin las
limitaciones que impone Facebook para las publicaciones
Automatiza Tu Negocio Con El Robot Y Aumenta Tus Ventas
¿Cuanto cuesta el Auto FB Marketer?
Un software de este tipo tiene un alto valor. Hoy,
El 21/11/14 a las 18:18, Angel Claudio Alvarez escibió:
El Fri, 21 Nov 2014 17:36:46 -0300
Epsilon Minus theepsilonmi...@gmail.com escribió:
Buenas..
Para un sistema privado en Sistemas de 32bits agregaba un link simbolico a
una libreria de Java de Oracle el JRE 6 sobre
Hej!
Någon som sett/läst om det kommer att släppas någon mer beta version av Jessie ?
Har sökt på Google, men inte hittat något om det.
--
/Rolf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-swedish-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Den 22 november 2014 15:12 skrev Rolf Edlund rolfew...@gmail.com:
Hej!
Någon som sett/läst om det kommer att släppas någon mer beta version av
Jessie ?
Har sökt på Google, men inte hittat något om det.
Jag tänkte närmast på att Jessie nu är fryst. Att det då inte blir
någon mer beta innan
Uma simples atualização dois servidores teria mitigado o problema. Se nem
isso fizeram, não há segurança no mundo que se possa aplicar. Não com essa
equipe.
Helio Loureiro
-= sent by Android =-
On Nov 21, 2014 2:53 PM, Anacleto Junior suporte.anacl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Bom dia pessoal,
Uma medida rapida seria trocar a shell e desinstalar o bash depois com mais tempo reavaliar as atualizacoes dos pacotes e ver pq nao estao sendo atualizados. Alguns sistemas nao promoverao atualizacoes como no caso do os x leopard pra baixo e monowall geralmente voce pode atualizar por conta
Bom, ai depende.
Dei uma olhada rapida no google, e recebi a informação que este problema é
de liberar acesso ao servidor.
Pensando brutamente, acredito que o mais basico seria bloquear o acesso a
seu servidor de ips não autorizados através de um firewall, segundo, para
melhorar o gerenciamento
Complementando,proponha a utilização do chroot, é uma excelente ferramenta
para enjaular aplicações sem deixar que estas tenham acesso ao seu
ambiente de forma global.
Em 22 de novembro de 2014 17:46, Rodrigo Cunha rodrigo.root...@gmail.com
escreveu:
Bom, ai depende.
Dei uma olhada rapida
Tente criar o arquivo na mão e (vim /root/.bash_logout) e inserir o seu
script.
Ps Coloque permissão de execução no arquivo.
Em 21 de novembro de 2014 17:07, Ednardo Lobo edna...@lobo.eti.br
escreveu:
Caro,
O ./bash_logout também é executado quando o shell é finalizado pelo
usuário root.
root@pc-desktop:/home/casa# dig NS locaweb.com.br
Sim,
execute o comando dig NS locaweb.com.br e ele vai te dar os servidores dns
da locaweb.
#dig NS locaweb.com.br
; DiG 9.9.5-3-Ubuntu NS locaweb.com.br
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id:
Eu li no google que é um tipo de ataque sim, o que fiz foi aumentar minha
segurança no ubuntu.
Coisas simples que eu achava sem necessidade, mas como a bendita travou a
minha rede...comecei a utilizar.
Minha máquina é de testes e nada tenho de importante nela, porém, vai saber
quando alguém vai
Hi,
as I wrote in my first comment, I already wrote a bugreport using reportbug.
If there is none, then maybe my reportbug is not working properly. I am going
to have to check this.
Thanks for the advice.
Best
Hans
Lisi, my first thought also, but... 'perhaps' Stephen *did* read the
OP's
On Saturday 22 November 2014 00:47:00 Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 22/11/14 09:59, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Friday 21 November 2014 22:43:11 Ross Boylan wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Scott Ferguson
scott.ferguson.debian.u...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21/11/14 15:13, Ross Boylan wrote:
On 22/11/14 19:07, Hans wrote:
Lisi, my first thought also, but... 'perhaps' Stephen *did* read
the OP's comment, and like myself, as a result of looking for the
bug report in an effort to find any useful information without
having to ask the OP - couldn't find any such bug report.
On 22/11/14 19:50, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Saturday 22 November 2014 00:47:00 Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 22/11/14 09:59, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Friday 21 November 2014 22:43:11 Ross Boylan wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Scott Ferguson
scott.ferguson.debian.u...@gmail.com wrote:
On
Didier,
you have *totally* missed the OPs point.
BTW, since you assume that no systemd takeover will happen (despite it
already has), what has been the outcome of the GR to support multiple
init systems?
Other than that, the OP has a good point. I found that every time
something is related
Please don't top post.
On 22/11/14 20:50, lee wrote:
Didier,
you have *totally* missed the OPs point.
BTW, since you assume that no systemd takeover
Hyperbole much?
will happen (despite it
already has),
what has been the outcome of the GR to support multiple
init systems?
It
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 21:46:19 +1100
Scott Ferguson scott.ferguson.debian.u...@gmail.com wrote:
It lost. Developers are not being forced to do what they don't want.
The winner was developers will work it out themselves i.e. Debian won.
Another reading being The Developpers won, Debian lost...
flame resistant underwear on
Scott Ferguson wrote:
It lost. Developers are not being forced to do what they don't want.
The winner was developers will work it out themselves i.e. Debian won.
This whole bit about developers are not being forced to do what they
don't want and developers will
On 22/11/14 22:14, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI wrote:
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 21:46:19 +1100
Scott Ferguson scott.ferguson.debian.u...@gmail.com wrote:
It lost. Developers are not being forced to do what they don't want.
The winner was developers will work it out themselves i.e. Debian won.
Another
Hi there
A lot of bugs [1] but no Debian updates.
Should I be concerned?
[1] For instance;
http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/security/AST-2014-012.html
Regards,
Rob
--
Comet: A very large bouncy castle.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On 22/11/14 23:20, Rob van der Putten wrote:
Hi there
A lot of bugs [1] but no Debian updates.
Should I be concerned?
Sorry - I don't have an authoritative answer to that. It 'might' help if
you gave some information about which release you are using.
[1] For instance;
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 22:43:01 +1100
Scott Ferguson scott.ferguson.debian.u...@gmail.com wrote:
It lost. Developers are not being forced to do what they don't want.
The winner was developers will work it out themselves i.e. Debian won.
Another reading being The Developpers won, Debian
Dear sockpuppet - I'm surprised you're still around, I heard your bridge
fell on you. [saddened]
On 22/11/14 23:22, Gregory Smith wrote:
Social progressives won.
And that's a bad thing? I'm guessing you'd prefer social regressives
(the anti-social) won.
snipped
On 11/22/14, Scott Ferguson
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 06:53:07PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Friday 21 November 2014 18:42:20 Stephen Allen wrote:
So, do not use this option in bleachbit! I already filed a bugreport and
think this warning might help others.
You should file a bug report. Run reportbug, should be on
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 08:34:08AM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 22/11/14 05:53, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Friday 21 November 2014 18:42:20 Stephen Allen wrote:
So, do not use this option in bleachbit! I already filed a bugreport and
think this warning might help others.
You should file a
Hi there
Scott Ferguson wrote:
Sorry - I don't have an authoritative answer to that. It 'might' help if
you gave some information about which release you are using.
Current Debian stable; 1:1.8.13.1~dfsg1-3+deb7u3
Did you scroll down and look at the Corrected in section and compare
the
On Lu, 10 nov 14, 18:20:37, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 11/10/2014 6:18 PM, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote:
Am 11.11.2014 um 00:14 schrieb Miles Fidelman:
Ok, then explain to me the procedure for running the installer in such a
way that systemd is never installed, thus avoiding any
HI,
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:05:08PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 08:03:58AM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 20 nov 14, 12:29:32, Joel Roth wrote:
...
Yes, they are. I'm curious at which step they get generated.
Your original post should have dbus in the command:
$
On 22/11/14 09:50, lee wrote:
Nobody understands udev rules,
Challenge accepted.
*looks at /etc/udev/rules.d* *looks at /lib/udev/rules.d*
I'm honestly baffled that someone who is capable of comfortably using
emacs thinks these files are incomprehensible. They appear to be written
in a
On Vi, 21 nov 14, 14:43:11, Ross Boylan wrote:
grub needs to know where it should jump to. I don't know how it can
figure that out from inside a chroot. For example, say /boot inside
the chroot is mounted from sdb2. To the chroot, it's just part of the
filesystem. How is grub-install to
On Vi, 21 nov 14, 12:41:35, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
Nowadays disks may hide this in their interface, but on the physical
media (I'm thinking of spinning rusty platters), we still have to obey
the laws of physics. Changing the magnetisation of a single spot is on
neigh-impossible without
Martin Read wrote:
On 22/11/14 09:50, lee wrote:
Nobody understands udev rules,
Challenge accepted.
*looks at /etc/udev/rules.d* *looks at /lib/udev/rules.d*
I'm honestly baffled that someone who is capable of comfortably using
emacs thinks these files are incomprehensible. They appear to
I understand your reasons for thinking Systemd is bad for Debian. I do, and I
also agree with some of them. However, Debian is composed of a diverse group
of people who have every viewpoint under the sun from Systemd is the bane of
Linux, to Systemd is the best thing to ever happen to Linux. No
hi everybody,
I disabled NFS yesterday using a systemctl disable nfs-common.service.
The output I got was OK, displaying the whole bunch of messages saying it
updated symlinks using update-rc.d.
But today, it restarted. And it is normal: the symlinks are still there.
I re-did again verifying
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:59:11PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Friday 21 November 2014 22:43:11 Ross Boylan wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Scott Ferguson
scott.ferguson.debian.u...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21/11/14 15:13, Ross Boylan wrote:
Over the last week I've repeatedly found
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 04:17:20PM -0200, Teresa e Junior wrote:
With curl 7.26.0-1+wheezy11? If your version is newer, I thought maybe I
could backport it from Jessie, but I don't know which package has the
problem here, if cURL, OpenSSL, GnuTLS, etc.
My version is older, as I'm using
Thank for you detail update.
can you please also share with your experience that. when i dstat i some
time see wait time between 10-17 and at that time my system works slow. and
my processor shows normal. what i have read about that wait values this is
due to IO issues.
now my question is how
On Saturday 22 November 2014 16:03:54 Buntunub wrote:
I
certainly have no qualms about including Systemd in the next stable
release, and I actually encourage it, so that people will have time to play
with it and come to know and possibly even fall in love with it. I
seriously do not
On Sb, 22 nov 14, 17:53:09, Jean-Marc wrote:
hi everybody,
I disabled NFS yesterday using a systemctl disable nfs-common.service.
The output I got was OK, displaying the whole bunch of messages saying it
updated symlinks using update-rc.d.
But today, it restarted. And it is normal: the
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 15:56:41 -0200, Teresa e Junior wrote:
Hello! I am using curl 7.26.0-1+wheezy11, and when I run `curl
https://www.basebit.com.br', it fails with the message:
curl: (35) error:14077438:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:tlsv1
alert internal error
This works:
curl --ciphers
2014/11/23 2:57 Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com:
On Saturday 22 November 2014 16:03:54 Buntunub wrote:
I
certainly have no qualms about including Systemd in the next stable
release, and I actually encourage it, so that people will have time to
play
with it and come to know and possibly
Lisi Reisz wrote
Systemd is available in the current stable, (see below) and people have
had
time to play and fall in love with it (or not). So in how many Stable
versions of Linux are you saying that it should be available, before those
who wish to do so will have had long enough to play
Hi!
I'm stumped. On my home network all my Debian installations _only_ use
the router as clock source.
# ntpq -p
remote refidst t when poll reach delay offset jitter
fritz.box X.Y.Z.A 3 u- 64
Le 22/11/2014 21:57, mad a écrit :
Hi!
I'm stumped. On my home network all my Debian installations _only_ use
the router as clock source.
# ntpq -p
remote refidst t when poll reach delay offset jitter
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 22:43:01 +1100
Scott Ferguson scott.ferguson.debian.u...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/11/14 22:14, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI wrote:
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 21:46:19 +1100
Scott Ferguson scott.ferguson.debian.u...@gmail.com wrote:
It lost. Developers are not being forced to do what
I'm running Jessie/AMD64 connecting to Wheezy/ADM64. The KVM virtual
machines are on the Wheezy machine, which is a also file print server
(CUPS, Samba NFS).
I'm getting an error Unable to connect to libvirt. You need to install
openssh-askpass or similar to connect to this host.
The
My daughter has recently purchased an iPod Touch and would like to be
able to maintain it from our linux box running Wheezy. My wife has an
iPad Mini and it would be nice to be able to maintain that from the
linux box, as well. I have googled. I have upgraded to the latest
kernel from
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:54:56 +0100, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
On 05/11/2014 17:02, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Miles,
Le mercredi, 5 novembre 2014, 09.32:57 Miles Fidelman a écrit :
[If you're happy with systemd, and not considering a change - please
stay out of this discussion. If you object
Hi.
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 17:41:38 -0500
Gary Dale garyd...@torfree.net wrote:
I'm running Jessie/AMD64 connecting to Wheezy/ADM64. The KVM virtual
machines are on the Wheezy machine, which is a also file print server
(CUPS, Samba NFS).
I'm getting an error Unable to connect to libvirt.
Joel Rees wrote:
2014/11/23 2:57 Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com
mailto:lisi.re...@gmail.com:
On Saturday 22 November 2014 16:03:54 Buntunub wrote:
I
certainly have no qualms about including Systemd in the next stable
release, and I actually encourage it, so that people will have
Months ago, installing jessie as guest on win7-64, I somehow ended up
with a 486 kernel.
In other previous installs it was a 686 kernel... not sure what I
did. But no doubt I selected it without realizing or the like.
My question is whether continuing to use the 486 versions of kernels
has any
On 23/11/14 02:10, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Lu, 10 nov 14, 18:20:37, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 11/10/2014 6:18 PM, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote:
Am 11.11.2014 um 00:14 schrieb Miles Fidelman:
Ok, then explain to me the procedure for running the installer in such a
way that systemd is never
On 22/11/14 06:06 PM, Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 17:41:38 -0500
Gary Dale garyd...@torfree.net wrote:
I'm running Jessie/AMD64 connecting to Wheezy/ADM64. The KVM virtual
machines are on the Wheezy machine, which is a also file print server
(CUPS, Samba NFS).
I'm getting an
I have a laptop (an old Asus EEEPC), and I need to replace its only disk
drive with a larger one. The hardware aspects are easy -- keep static
electricity away and use a screwdriver. I have the new drive on my desk
already.
And it's not hard to copy the file systems, either. I can
On 22/11/14 06:18 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
Months ago, installing jessie as guest on win7-64, I somehow ended up
with a 486 kernel.
In other previous installs it was a 686 kernel... not sure what I
did. But no doubt I selected it without realizing or the like.
My question is whether continuing
In an effort to keep a ration discussion from sliding into a pointless
flame-war.
On 23/11/14 02:07, Martin Read wrote:
On 22/11/14 09:50, lee wrote:
Nobody understands udev rules,
Challenge accepted.
*looks at /etc/udev/rules.d* *looks at /lib/udev/rules.d*
I'm honestly baffled that
On 22/11/14 06:29 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
I have a laptop (an old Asus EEEPC), and I need to replace its only disk
drive with a larger one. The hardware aspects are easy -- keep static
electricity away and use a screwdriver. I have the new drive on my desk
already.
And it's not hard to copy
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 23:29:20 +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
I have a laptop (an old Asus EEEPC), and I need to replace its only disk
drive with a larger one. The hardware aspects are easy -- keep static
electricity away and use a screwdriver. I have the new drive on my desk
already.
And it's
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 22:49:48 + (UTC)
Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
But it is absurd to say that discussing these real problems faced by
Debian users, and their potential remedies, is off topic in the debian-
user mailing list.
Of course they are not.
But they are anathema
On 23/11/14 03:03, Buntunub wrote:
I understand your reasons for thinking Systemd is bad for Debian. I do, and I
also agree with some of them. However, Debian is composed of a diverse group
of people who have every viewpoint under the sun from Systemd is the bane of
Linux, to Systemd is the
Harry Putnam a écrit :
My question is whether continuing to use the 486 versions of kernels
has any down sides?
The -486 kernel lacks support for multiprocessing/hyperthreading and PAE
(which is required for NX/XD bit).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On 23/11/14 08:47, Anders Wegge Keller wrote:
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 22:43:01 +1100 Scott Ferguson
scott.ferguson.debian.u...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/11/14 22:14, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI wrote:
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 21:46:19 +1100 Scott Ferguson
scott.ferguson.debian.u...@gmail.com wrote:
It
Gary Dale a écrit :
On 22/11/14 06:29 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
And it's not hard to copy the file systems, either. I can temporarily
access the new drive using a USB adaptor. fdisk and the lvm utilities
will create the new partitions and then I copy, using dd or rsync or tar/
[...]
Have
On 11/22/2014 06:34 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 23:29:20 +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
I have a laptop (an old Asus EEEPC), and I need to replace its only disk
drive with a larger one. The hardware aspects are easy -- keep static
electricity away and use a screwdriver. I have
On 23/11/14 09:50, Marc Shapiro wrote:
My daughter has recently purchased an iPod Touch and would like to be
able to maintain it from our linux box running Wheezy. My wife has an
iPad Mini and it would be nice to be able to maintain that from the
linux box, as well. I have googled. I have
Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI writes:
But they are anathema to the We are systemd of Borg, resistance is
futile crowd.
And then there is the Systemd is the Borg! Kill! Kill! crowd who jump
into every mention of Systemd to piss and moan about the other crowd,
which then retaliates. While I can and will
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
