J'ai récupéré un EeePC avec un DD (2.5 320Go) planté, je n'ai pu
reprendre qu'une partie seulement des données de la propriétaire
malheureuse et je suis autorisé à lui réinstaller une distrib Linux.
Et là, les choses sont devenues difficiles : le DD n'était pas reconnu
par la distrib en Live-USB.
On 12/10/2014 10:33 AM, Pierre TOUZEAU wrote:
J'ai récupéré un EeePC avec un DD (2.5 320Go) planté, je n'ai pu
reprendre qu'une partie seulement des données de la propriétaire
Il est en train d'essayer de formater l'unique partition en Ext4,
10mn puis : Erreur d'entrée/sortie lors de
CP c...@alexetchris.com a écrit :
en tant que particulier de l'Union Européenne, le fait de mettre un
GNU/linux à la place de Windows n'annule absolument pas la garantie de
votre appareil.
En fait il faut comprendre qu'il y a 2 garanties :
- la garantie commerciale, optionnelle, offerte par
Pierre TOUZEAU a écrit :
Avant de vous indiquer les différentes actions entreprises, je vous
demande une opinion :
Le DD est mort ou, à votre avis, y a t'il quelque chose, même de
désespéré que je puisse encore tenter ?
Qu'affiche smartctl -a /dev/sdX ?
Si c'est un SSD, tu peux essayer un
Merci Pascal pour la commande que je ne connaissais pas...
Cela finit de me convaincre que le disque (magnétique) est en très
mauvaise forme...
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: FAILED!
Drive failure expected in less than 24 hours. SAVE ALL DATA.
smartctl -a /dev/sdb
smartctl
Pierre TOUZEAU a écrit :
Merci Pascal pour la commande que je ne connaissais pas...
Cela finit de me convaincre que le disque (magnétique) est en très
mauvaise forme...
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED
WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate
bonjour,
personellement j'ai jamais pu aller plus loin quand smartmontools me donne
un result: FAILED au lieu de PASSED:
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: FAILED!
Drive failure expected in less than 24 hours. SAVE ALL DATA.
a ta place je changerai de disque direct !
Le 10 déc.
Bonjour,
Le mardi 09 décembre 2014 à 20:16, moi-meme a écrit :
solution parfaite :
Les solutions les plus simples le sont souvent :-D
je crée le fichier sur le NAS (dd), formattage,
Montage en root : un chmod 777 me permet d'y accéder en user (pas propre
mais provisoire et unique).
Pas
Le Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:20:01 +0100, Sébastien NOBILI a écrit :
Tu n'as qu'à ajouter une ligne à ton fstab (dans mon exemple c'est une
image ISO, d'où le système de fichiers « iso9660 ») :
/home/sni/tmp/boot/sebian-netinstall-3.2.0-4-686-pae.iso /mnt/tmp
iso9660
Le mercredi 10 décembre 2014 à 14:53, moi-meme a écrit :
Plutôt qu'un « chmod 777 », tu pourrais faire « chown ton_ident » (pas
besoin du « -R » puisque tu vas créer les fichiers en tant que toi-même
- enfin, en tant que « moi-même » - enfin tu m'as compris :-D)
si je ne fais pas de ligne
Le Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:40:01 +0100, Sébastien NOBILI a écrit :
Si tu fais tout en root, ce n'est pas nécessaire (mais ce n'est pas bien
non plus).
comme je ne l'ai pas dit c'est pour faire un upgrade complet de l'OS avec
reformattage du DD.
Pas suicidaire, je cherchais à faire des copies de
Le mercredi 10 décembre 2014 à 15:47, moi-meme a écrit :
comme je ne l'ai pas dit c'est pour faire un upgrade complet de l'OS avec
reformattage du DD.
Pas suicidaire, je cherchais à faire des copies de sauvegarde.
Ah ben dans ce cas, tu aurais pu tout simplement faire une image complète de
Re,
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 05:38:19PM +0100, Sébastien NOBILI wrote:
[...]
Ah ben dans ce cas, tu aurais pu tout simplement faire une image complète de
ton
disque :
dd if=/dev/sda of=/le/chemin/vers/le/nas/nom_fichier_image
L'avantage c'est que tu as tout (y-compris Grub),
Le 07-12-2014 19:04, Johnny B a écrit :
Si tu te documentes sur le ssl et les navigateurs tu comprendras
l'absurdité de tes actions ;)
Je ne vois pas bien en quoi l'insulte fait avancer les choses...
On 12/07/2014 05:14 PM, Nicolas wrote:
Le 07-12-2014 16:51, Pascal Hambourg a écrit :
Nicolas a écrit :
Le 07-12-2014 19:04, Johnny B a écrit :
Si tu te documentes sur le ssl et les navigateurs tu comprendras
l'absurdité de tes actions ;)
Je ne vois pas bien en quoi l'insulte fait avancer les choses...
Ne pas confondre une critique (ce que tu fais est absurde), aussi mal
Le 10-12-2014 22:27, Pascal Hambourg a écrit :
Nicolas a écrit :
Le 07-12-2014 19:04, Johnny B a écrit :
Si tu te documentes sur le ssl et les navigateurs tu comprendras
l'absurdité de tes actions ;)
Je ne vois pas bien en quoi l'insulte fait avancer les choses...
Ne pas confondre une
El Tue, 09 Dec 2014 19:21:10 +0100, Eduardo Rios escribió:
El 09/12/14 a las 15:35, Camaleón escribió:
(...)
Por cierto, ¿sería conveniente dejar /etc/apt/sources.list ya así?:
(...)
¿Cómo ya? :-)
Si siempre has querido mantener Jessie cuando salga podrías haber
dejado jessie en el
El Tue, 09 Dec 2014 11:44:49 -0430, Edward Villarroel (EDD) escribió:
buenas tardes comunidad el siguiente hilo es nada mas para saber y
discutir quienes han considerado devuan?
La iniciativa es loable y confirma la falta de tacto con la que han
actuado desde Debian a este respecto (me
Pues la verdad no entiendo mucho con respecto a lo acontecido en debian por
systemd, sin embargo me parece mal el hecho se que no se tenga en cuenta al
usuario final, creo que me pasaría a debían u otra distro que me permita
realmente instalar lo que quiero, esperar a ver que sucede.
El dic
yo actualmente ya estoy testiando freebsd! y me a gustado mucho! e tenido
inconveniente con acpi y la configuración de teclado!!! y sus paquetes son
muy actualizado lo único q extra;o realmente el el paper-flash de chrome
pero de resto es fácil de configurar...
y el otro punto negativo es la
Son muchas las distribuciones con SystemD, no entiendo muy bien el porque
este problema parece que solo se da con Debian, ArchLinux o Fedora por
poner ejemplos usan este sistema de arranque desde hace tiempo.
A mi me parece bien la existencia de este fork ya que viene a sumar una
alternativa pero
El día 10 de diciembre de 2014, 12:20, Carlos Nicolas
carlos.nico...@gmail.com escribió:
Son muchas las distribuciones con SystemD, no entiendo muy bien el porque
este problema parece que solo se da con Debian, ArchLinux o Fedora por poner
ejemplos usan este sistema de arranque desde hace
Hola buenas, quiero realizar un filtro en apache pero no se si realmente se
puede. Por ejemplo esta url:
https://www.example.com
Quiero que si se le pasa un parámetro, devuelva la pagina bien:
https://www.example.com/?embed=true
Y si no se lo pasas o le pasas otro parámetro, que devuelva un
Mi error... no vi que lo mandé al privado... estoy lalo...
-- Mensaje reenviado --
De: Miguel Matos unefistano...@gmail.com
Fecha: 10 de diciembre de 2014, 17:52
Asunto: Re: devuan
Para: JESUS0414 . yeshua0...@gmail.com
El día 10 de diciembre de 2014, 11:28, JESUS0414 .
El Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:30:57 +0100
Maykel Franco maykeldeb...@gmail.com escribió:
Hola buenas, quiero realizar un filtro en apache pero no se si realmente se
puede. Por ejemplo esta url:
https://www.example.com
Quiero que si se le pasa un parámetro, devuelva la pagina bien:
El 10/12/2014 23:48, Angel Claudio Alvarez an...@angel-alvarez.com.ar
escribió:
El Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:30:57 +0100
Maykel Franco maykeldeb...@gmail.com escribió:
Hola buenas, quiero realizar un filtro en apache pero no se si
realmente se
puede. Por ejemplo esta url:
señores tengo un debian 7.7 , y cada que quiero instalar un paquete me sale :
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
he googleado , pero no encuentro nada relacionado a wheeze
--
rickygm
http://gnuforever.homelinux.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
instalar con que, aptitude, dpkg, apt-get, apt, ya actualizaste?
aptitude update aptitude full-upgrade
no tienes dependencias rotas?
El 10/12/14 a las #4, ricky gutierrez escribió:
señores tengo un debian 7.7 , y cada que quiero instalar un paquete me sale :
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg
2014-12-10 18:29 GMT-04:30 ricky gutierrez xserverli...@gmail.com:
señores tengo un debian 7.7 , y cada que quiero instalar un paquete me sale :
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
he googleado , pero no encuentro nada relacionado a wheeze
--
rickygm
Hola, no he actualizado el sistema, el error se me presenta cada que
instalo con apt-get.
On Wednesday, December 10, 2014, Gustavo Castro g...@esdebian.org wrote:
instalar con que, aptitude, dpkg, apt-get, apt, ya actualizaste?
aptitude update aptitude full-upgrade
no tienes dependencias
Antes que nada perdón por usar la lista por asuntos de esta índole.
Quiero hacer un curso de Linux y obtener la certificación LPIC-1 y LPIC-2.
Estoy entre Linux College ( http://www.linuxcollege.com.ar/index.htm ) y
CLA ( http://www.linuxinstitute.com.ar/curso/dlse )
El CLA es a distancia, pero
Olá à todos.
Estou usando o Jessie, e desde que ele entrou em freeze, o apt-cache tem
dificuldade para encontrar pacotes que busco, principalmente como
usuário comum.
$ apt-cache show bluefish
N: Impossível encontrar o pacote bluefish
E: Nenhum pacote encontrado
$ apt-cache search pt-br |wc
Eu não uso apt-cache...
Mas vc tentou dar um apt-get update para atualizar o cache ou algo do
gênero e depois fazer a busca?? Enfim tenta com o aptitude search
pacote ou aptitude show pacote depois de atualizar para ver se
persiste o problema
Em 10/12/14, Enio Climaco Sales
Eu tenho utilizado o Jessie há muito tempo e atualizado (apt-get update)
praticamente todo dia sem problemas. Utilizo ftp.br.debian.org como fonte.
Em 10 de dezembro de 2014 11:01, P. J. pjotam...@gmail.com escreveu:
Eu não uso apt-cache...
Mas vc tentou dar um apt-get update para atualizar o
Talvez o apt-get update não esteja atualizando o cache do sistema como
deveria, veja a diferença:
$ apt-cache search pt-br |wc -l
5
# apt-cache search pt-br |wc -l
17
# aptitude search pt-br |wc -l
13
O problema do aptitude é que teria de invocar os poderes da super-vaca
toda vez que
Segundo nosso amigo traceroute, ftp.br.debian.org e debian.c3sl.ufpr.br
nos levam ao mesmo endereço.
O problema creio que seja no apt-get, pois após eu dar um aptitude
search ... o apt-cache conseguiu achar o pacote bluefish, como exemplo.
On 10-12-2014 11:16, Flavio Menezes dos Reis wrote:
Eu
$ aptitude search bluefish
E: Abrindo /etc/apt/sources.list - ifstream::ifstream (13: Permissão
negada)
E: Abrindo /etc/apt/sources.list - ifstream::ifstream (13: Permissão
negada)
E: A lista de fontes não pode ser lida.
Esta menssagem é típica de alguém executando o comando apt sem
Essa piada da vaca é pq vc fez alguma besteira no comando... e até
aonde eu sei o aptitude search pacote pode usar para qq usuário
Em 10/12/14, Fábio Rabelofa...@fabiorabelo.wiki.br escreveu:
$ aptitude search bluefish
E: Abrindo /etc/apt/sources.list - ifstream::ifstream (13: Permissão
Pois foi isso mesmo que eu disse:
O problema do aptitude é que teria de invocar os poderes da
super-vaca toda vez que tivesse de buscar um pacote.
On 10-12-2014 11:48, Fábio Rabelo wrote:
Esta menssagem é típica de alguém executando o comando apt sem
possuir os direitos de root !
O Sr.
Não costumo usar o aptitude, mas ele só abre como root. Diferente do
synaptic, que quando o uso como usuário comum me mostra a lista de todos
os pacotes, o aptitude apenas me avisa que não pode ler o sources.list,
por ter acesso negado, e abre em branco. Portanto, como usuário comum o
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:20:24PM -0200, Enio Climaco Sales Junior wrote:
Não costumo usar o aptitude, mas ele só abre como root.
você está enganado. O aptitude roda normalmente com usuário não-root pra
consulta. o problema é que no *seu sistema* os arquivos que o aptitude precisa
ler (mas não
Dando permissão de leitura do sources.list ao meu usuário, tudo corre
bem, e sem o risco de fazer lambança, ótimo.
No entanto, costumo usar o apt-get, pois quando pedia para instalar
algum pacote, essa instalação costumava ser mais enxuta. Agora, por
exemplo, para o apt-get meu sistema está
Srs,
Estou com uma duvida de layout para o meu servidor de monitoramento, estou
implementando um projeto onde o nagios serviria para monitorar 20
servidores, o básico:
Serviços, Espaço em disco, memoria consumida, load,Ping , Uptime e websites.
Minha duvida é o que deveria levar em consideração na
Olá...
Sua suspeita parece estar correta.
Quando habilito apenas a placa *intel* no *xorg.conf* o GDM inicia já
n'aquela tela de erro:
*Oh no! Something has gone wrong.*
*A problem has occurred and the system can't recover.*
*Please log out and try again*.
E um botão de logout. (que
On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 11:05 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
Some mnths ago (not sure how many) the icons (running program
indicators) that appear in the bottom (taskbar like ) panel changed
from showing icons of the running program such as the emacs icon,
xterm icon, vim icon etc. to just showing a
Hello.
What is the status of the bug in gnome in Debian 7 amd64, whereby,
upon trying to reboot or shutdown the system, using the gnome classic
interface, the system just goes rabid, and requires to be stopped by
the forced disorderly shutdown, of holding don the power switch, until
the system
Le Wednesday 10 December 2014 08:05:49, tv.deb...@googlemail.com a écrit :
On 10/12/2014 09:30, Frédéric Marchal wrote:
Le Tuesday 09 December 2014 16:36:53, The Wanderer a écrit :
On 12/09/2014 at 10:09 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 09:48:58AM +0100, Frédéric Marchal
On mer., 2014-12-10 at 06:56 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Hi,
there's been a new release of xorg-server fixing multiple security
vulnerabilities:
http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2014-December/002500.html
The update is ready for Wheezy/stable and has been successfully tested
Frédéric Marchal writes:
Le Wednesday 10 December 2014 08:05:49, tv.deb...@googlemail.com a écrit :
On 10/12/2014 09:30, Frédéric Marchal wrote:
Le Tuesday 09 December 2014 16:36:53, The Wanderer a écrit :
On 12/09/2014 at 10:09 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at
Why not put these packages into experimental? It would make testing easier, at
least for me.
Thanks for your caring.
--
Regards,
jvp.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Le Wednesday 10 December 2014 09:49:51, Gian Uberto Lauri a écrit :
Frédéric Marchal writes:
Le Wednesday 10 December 2014 08:05:49, tv.deb...@googlemail.com a écrit
:
On 10/12/2014 09:30, Frédéric Marchal wrote:
Le Tuesday 09 December 2014 16:36:53, The Wanderer a écrit :
On
Bob Proulx a écrit :
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Bob Proulx a écrit :
I favor RAID6's extra redundancy for more safety but I
still use RAID1 too.
RAID 1 can provide as much or more redundancy than RAID 6.
RAID 1 on 3 disks provides as much redundancy as RAID 6.
RAID 1 on 4 disks provides more
At second glance, I noticed these packages are for Wheezy/stable.
So the experimental archive is not appropriate for these packages.
These fixes seem to be not included in the sid packages yet?
--
Regards,
jvp.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Ma, 09 dec 14, 18:48:54, Patrick Bartek wrote:
What patterns did you see?
What claims did I make? What a lot of Debian server admins think of
systemd? A rhetorical statement. A lot of Debian server admins
don't like systemd to put it mildly. They said so -- explicitly -- with
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:07:52 +0100
Frédéric Marchal frederic.marc...@wowtechnology.com wrote:
In the case of regularly failing power it would probably be more often
inconvenient to run fsck at shutdown.
Power failures are as likely to occur during boot, don't they?
In my case no, more
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:49:51 +0100
Gian Uberto Lauri sa...@eng.it wrote:
fsck may take time. Relax, it needs that time.
What if I do not have that time, and an un-interruptible fsck is launched
automatically ?
This regression must be got rid of.
Cheers,
Ron.
--
On Mi, 10 dec 14, 00:51:16, Tad Bak wrote:
Hi,
The subject says all: after issuing the command:
apt-get install librecad
I am getting:
[...]
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
librecad : Depends: libqt4-help (= 4:4.5.3) but it is not going to be
installed
On Mi, 10 dec 14, 10:22:28, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
Hi all
I have to use a repo: http://open.iabsis.com/debian/
When adding it in my sources, apt complains about not having GPG key about
it.
Would you know how to guess the gpg invocation (server, key,...) in order to
import it to
On Mi, 10 dec 14, 08:53:08, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
All this just because you
won't admit that systemd took away a feature, and that it is systemd's
business to bring it back.
Mmm, I'll have to chime in here. The fact is, systemd never implemented
this feature, while your statement
On Mi, 10 dec 14, 07:32:07, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
In my case no, more likely during shut-down, since the only time I
shut down my box is when there is a power cut, and I have to shut it
down quickly, before the UPS gives up. So I certainly do not want an
unwanted automatic fsck at that
Frédéric Marchal writes:
Usually on shutdown you run sync that flushes the cache to the disk,
cleanly preparing the disk for unmounting. The mount command should
'run' sync automatically when unmounting.
You run fsck on power up because the 'system does not remember' if it
was
Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI writes:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:49:51 +0100
Gian Uberto Lauri sa...@eng.it wrote:
fsck may take time. Relax, it needs that time.
What if I do not have that time,
Find it (this includes planning - of infrastructure and procedures if
required).
No other choices.
On Mi, 10 dec 14, 13:04:16, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
Of course, there's also the option of completely disabling automatic
fsck (there are several ways to do this), as I understand is the default
for new enough filesystems. This would make more sense for me on systems
with bad power (you'd
Le Wednesday 10 December 2014 11:10:52, Frédéric Marchal a écrit :
Le Wednesday 10 December 2014 09:49:51, Gian Uberto Lauri a écrit :
You run fsck on power up because the 'system does not remember' if it
was shut-off cleanly or not. If the disks are clean and the last check
is not too old,
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Mi, 10 dec 14, 07:32:07, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
In my case no, more likely during shut-down, since the only time I
shut down my box is when there is a power cut, and I have to shut it
down quickly, before the UPS gives up. So I certainly do not
Hi guys,
I am building a platform and I need to compile apache mesos from sources.
The issue is that the guys the require support for specific c++11 features
that in the 4.7 compiler currently supported by debian aren't there. Will
the g++ compiler will be updated?We would like to use debian as
Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com writes:
On Ma, 09 dec 14, 11:05:23, Harry Putnam wrote:
Further, some indicators still show the regular icon. One I notice is
iceweasel.
I'd like the old behavior back but have no idea how to start digging
into it.
I'm guessing the icon is set
Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com writes:
[...]
Hugo Vanwoerkom hvw59...@care2.com writes:
[...]
Tixy t...@yxit.co.uk writes:
[...]
Whoops, forgot the promised screen grab:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 09:48:58AM +0100, Frédéric Marchal wrote:
Now, is it possible to run fsck during shutdown? Users have been asking
for
this for at least 10 years. Is it now
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Mi, 10 dec 14, 00:51:16, Tad Bak wrote:
Hi,
The subject says all: after issuing the command:
apt-get install librecad
[...]
Works here (i386). Did you 'apt-get update' recently?
Kind regards,
Andrei
Yes, just earlier today there were a couple of security
On Wed, 2014-12-10 at 07:25 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
Tixy t...@yxit.co.uk writes:
A (possibly wild) speculation is there's some race condition where the
task bar button gets created before the application sets it's icon and
then doesn't get notice or act on the change.
As an experiment I
It seems the discussion revolves around methods to disable an automatic
fsck when it
is not wanted.
It went away from an obvious solution (^C a running fsck) and suggests
compilcated and/or
convoluted workarounds, which have to be implemented or enabled proactively.
I want to get back to the
Le 2014-12-10 13:23, Nick Mpallas a écrit :
Hi guys,
I am building a platform and I need to compile apache mesos from sources. The
issue is that the guys the require support for specific c++11 features that
in the 4.7 compiler currently supported by debian aren't there. Will the g++
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 01:23:31PM +0100, Nick Mpallas wrote:
Hi guys,
I am building a platform and I need to compile apache mesos from sources.
The issue is that the guys the require support for specific c++11 features
that in the 4.7 compiler currently supported by debian aren't
Christian Groessler writes:
To get the machine to boot again, I had to enter the BIOS, disable the
network card there,
Hmmm... you could have tried with a single user mode bootstrap, that
could have avoided you going to the BIOS.
Quite a dance instead of just typing ^C
^C could be
On 12/10/2014 01:23 PM, Nick Mpallas wrote:
I am building a platform and I need to compile apache mesos from sources. The
issue is that the guys the require support for specific c++11 features that in
the 4.7 compiler currently supported by debian aren't there. Will the g++
compiler will be
On Mi, 10 dec 14, 13:41:51, Christian Groessler wrote:
I want to get back to the root of the problem and claim, that I want to be
able to interrupt *any* startup
command, not just fsck.
The debug shell could be (part of) the answer, but beware of the
security risks. See
On Mi, 10 dec 14, 08:04:00, Tixy wrote:
I started getting the same problem at a similar time with Jessie LXDE.
Do your applications have the correct icons in the top left of their
windows still? Mine does, it's just the taskbar which is wrong.
A (possibly wild) speculation is there's some
On Wed 10 Dec 2014 at 13:26:57 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Mi, 10 dec 14, 13:04:16, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
Of course, there's also the option of completely disabling automatic
fsck (there are several ways to do this), as I understand is the default
for new enough filesystems. This
On 12/10/2014 at 06:04 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Mi, 10 dec 14, 08:53:08, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
All this just because you won't admit that systemd took away a
feature, and that it is systemd's business to bring it back.
Mmm, I'll have to chime in here. The fact is, systemd
On 12/10/2014 at 06:10 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Mi, 10 dec 14, 07:32:07, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
In my case no, more likely during shut-down, since the only time I
shut down my box is when there is a power cut, and I have to shut
it down quickly, before the UPS gives up. So I certainly do
Actually, it's *always* a surprise. These fsck happen at long enough
intervals, that I can never know if it was 4 months ago or 7 months
ago, and neither can I remember which laptop/desktop has the delay set
to 172 days vs 194 days vs 98 days vs ...
Can't you write a small script to obviate
Hi,
After upgrading from Sqeeze to Wheezy i have two problems with starting
up services while booting.
First the service xdm is now started long before other services (like
dhcp, clamd, dansguardian...) are started.
Before the upgrade xdm was the last service that was started which was ok.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 09:42:43AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
On 12/10/2014 at 06:10 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Mi, 10 dec 14, 07:32:07, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
In my case no, more likely during shut-down, since the only time I
shut down my box is when there is a power cut, and I have
On Mi, 10 dec 14, 09:29:17, The Wanderer wrote:
For such a user, this is not a systemd-centric question; it is a
Debian-centric one, and the responsibility of having caused it and for
fixing it is on Debian. Debian chose to switch to systemd, and that
switch introduced this bug; it is
I want to get back to the root of the problem and claim, that I want
to be able to interrupt *any* startup command, not just fsck.
Oh, yes, aol-mode me too! /aol-mode!
Systemd's boot seems to suffer a lot more from such problems. E.g. it
waits for a long time before timeout if one of the
I want to get back to the root of the problem and claim, that I want
to be able to interrupt *any* startup command, not just fsck.
The debug shell could be (part of) the answer,
You mean, they're probably going to answer by pointing us to the
debug shell? Yes, probably. But it's again just a
On Mi, 10 dec 14, 09:42:43, The Wanderer wrote:
Both of those latter situations are similarly time-limited, and even if
there are heuristic solutions for the others, the last at least will
generally not be something the computer can detect and identify.
As said in my other message:
1.
I've tried the i386 install (v7.7) CD multiple times and I've tried having
it put GRUB on the MBR and on the partition and neither way resulted
in a bootable install.
I think this can be made to work with a bit of twiddling (e.g. using
lilo or grub-legacy, or maybe tweaking of the
On 12/10/2014 at 10:12 AM, Darac Marjal wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 09:42:43AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
On 12/10/2014 at 06:10 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
That would be easy to implement, assuming you computer knows
it's running on batteries.
On batteries is easy enough, for a
On 12/10/2014 at 10:14 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Mi, 10 dec 14, 09:29:17, The Wanderer wrote:
For such a user, this is not a systemd-centric question; it is a
Debian-centric one, and the responsibility of having caused it and
for fixing it is on Debian. Debian chose to switch to systemd,
Hi Rick,
Actually, THAT is the very reason we ask for the option to be able to cancel
a running fsck. You can never predict
EVERY situation when fsck would be run but needed to be avoided.
Maybe I asked a non tech to simply turn on the machine, how technical does
one need to be to do that.
On 12/08/2014 09:12 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Monday 08 December 2014 13:18:18 Marty wrote:
I would even deign to
give users a choice in the matter,
[snip]
Multi-seat PC and other
anachronisms probably have to go away.
Choice???
Lisi
The industry and its plans for FOSS is strongly
Hello,
replying inline
On 10/12/2014 14:04, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Mi, 10 dec 14, 08:53:08, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
All this just because you
won't admit that systemd took away a feature, and that it is systemd's
business to bring it back.
Mmm, I'll have to chime in here. The fact
On 12/10/14 14:10, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote:
Christian Groessler writes:
To get the machine to boot again, I had to enter the BIOS, disable the
network card there,
Hmmm... you could have tried with a single user mode bootstrap, that
could have avoided you going to the BIOS.
That was in
On 12/10/2014 10:14 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
In my not so humble opinion, one should be using such a switch to
re-examine one's setup, practices, etc. You might discover some
interesting stuff. As far as I'm concerned:
1. I'll be looking into disabling periodic checks on all my ext4
On 12/10/2014 02:19 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Mi, 10 dec 14, 10:22:28, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
Hi all
I have to use a repo: http://open.iabsis.com/debian/
When adding it in my sources, apt complains about not having GPG key about
it.
Would you know how to guess the gpg invocation
On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 10:10:05 PM UTC+5:30, Marty wrote:
On 12/08/2014 09:12 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Monday 08 December 2014 13:18:18 Marty wrote:
I would even deign to
give users a choice in the matter,
[snip]
Multi-seat PC and other
anachronisms probably have to go away.
On 12/08/2014 10:43 AM, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
About anachronism... you should read about what is the minitel*, and
then, consider thinking about how most people uses their computers ;)
*: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minitel
Anyone remember GTE Telemail?? :) Ric
--
My
On 12/10/2014 12:53 AM, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
All this just because you won't admit that
It's gotten to the point that wholesale deleting of this topic is in
order. :/ Ric
--
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
There are two Great Sins in the world...
..the Sin of Ignorance,
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
